Telangana High Court
CRLP/8141/2026 of Brijja Mahesh Vs The State of Telangana, on 4 June 2026
THE HIGH COURT FOR THE STATE OF TELANGANA AT HYDERABAD THURSDAY, THE FOURTH DAY OF JUNE TWO THOUSAND AND TWENry SIX PRESENT THE HONOURABLE SRI JUSTICE SUDDALA CHALAPATHI RAO CRIMINAL PETITION NO:81 41 0F 2026 Between: 1. Brijja Mahesh, S/o Bi.lja Narsaiah, Aged about 34 Yrs' Occ Private Service
[ 34851
IN THE HIGH COURT FOR THE STATE OF TELANGANA
AT HYDERABAD
THURSDAY, THE FOURTH DAY OF JUNE
TWO THOUSAND AND TWENry SIX
PRESENT
THE HONOURABLE SRI JUSTICE SUDDALA CHALAPATHI RAO
CRIMINAL PETITION NO:8141 0F 2026
Between:
1. Brijja Mahesh, S/o Bi.lja Narsaiah, Aged about 34 Yrs' Occ Private Service Rl; 11-10'78,7/1 , RJparthi Nagar, Ramanagutta, Khammam' Khammam District.
2. Srinrr':rr;r' i:r,rc Kondle Alias Vasu, S/o K Satyanarayana, Aged about 50 Yrs'
Occ. Busrness R/o H No.B-3-235/9/F/N, 119, Tirumala APTS Yousufguda'
Khairatabad, HYderabad.
...Petitioner/A-1 & A'2
The State of Telangana, Rep by its Public Prosecutor' High Gourt for the State ofTelangana, Hyderabad "Respondent No' 1
G.Surender, S/o Late Narsimlu Aged about.34 Yrs, occ. Private Employee R/o Sr,r' a 'r Near Ganesh Temple-, Quthbullapur, Medchal Malkajgiri District
...De-facto GomplainanURespondent No' 2
Petition;.'i-,rSection52SofBNSSprayingthatinthecircumstancesstatedin the Memorandtrnr of Grounds of Criminal Petition, the High Court may be pleased to quashtheProceedingsinCr.No'765ot2026onthefileofP'S'Petbasheerabad'
MedchalMalkajgiriDistrict,againstthePetitionerstA-1&A-2intheinterestofjustice.
AND
l.A. NO: 2 OF 2026
p"111i6n.'r"darSection52SofBNSSprayingthatinthecircumstancesstatedin the Memor'ai,u., , -i Grounds of Criminal Petition' the High Court may be pleased to Stayallfurtherproceedingsincludingthearrestofthepetitioners/A-,1&2inCr'No.
I
765 of 202) ci . r frie of P S. Petbasheerabad, Medchal Malkajgiri District, pending disposal of the above Petition.
This D,-ri' " coming on for hearrng, upon perusing the Memorandum of Grounds of Crrminal Petition and upon hearing the arguments of Sri P N Arun Kumar, Advocate for the Petitioner and the Additional Public Prosecutor on behalf of the Respondent No 1 and of None appeared for the Respondent No. 2.
The Court made the following: ORDER
.*.. ::ai:aa:.. .:,
IN THE HIGH COURT FOR THE STATE OF TELIINGANA
AT HYDERABAD
THE HON'BLE SRI WSTICE SUDDALA CHALAPATHI RAO
CRIMINAL PETITIOT{ No.8141 of 2026
flate: 04.O6.2O26
Between:
Brijj a Mahesh and another
... Petitioners-Accused Nos.1 and 2
AND
The State of Telangana,
Represented by its Public Prosecutor,
High Court for the State ofTelangana, Hyderabad and another.
...Respondent
Citations and Judicial Treatment
Cited by
0
Decisions in the index citing it
Cites
0
Decisions referred to
In this index
0
Of the decisions it cites
Overruled / Questioned
0
No negative treatment found
Loading the citing and cited decisions…
This judgment in the centre: on the left the decisions it cites, on the right the decisions citing it. Colour is the treatment; choose a decision to open it.
ORDER:
l. The petitioners are arrayed as accused Nos' 1 and 2 in Crime No.76512O26 on the file of Pebasheerabad Police Station, Cyberabad Commissionerate, for the alleged offence under Sections 140(3), 3O8, 127(2\, 351(2), 118 read with 3(5) of Bharatiya Nyaya Sanhitha, 2023.
2. Heard Sri P.N.Arun Kumar, learned counsel for the petitioner/ accused Nos' 1 and 2 as well as learned Additional Public Prosecutor appearing for the respondent- State'
3. Without going into the merits of the case, since the punishment prescribed for the offences alleged against .- SCR. J Crlp 8141 2026 petitioners is less than seven (07) years, this Court deems it appropriate to direct petitioner to appear before the Investigating Officer as and r.l-hen required. and in turn, the Investigating Officer is directed to follow the procedure laid down under Section 35(3) of the Bharatiya Nagarik Suraksha Sanhita (previously, 41 -A of Cr.p.C.) a,,d also the g,idelines formulated by the Honourable Supreme Court of India in Arnesh Kumar a. State of Bihar t scrupulously. However, petitioners shall submit their defense and co-operate with the Investigating officer as and when required by furnishing information and produce all relevant documents/ material required for the purpose of the investigation anrl the Investigating officer sharl consider the same before filing appropriate report before the learned Magistrate concerned. 4 . With the above directions, this Criminal petition is disposed of. As a sequel, miscellaneous petitions pending, if any, shall stand closed ^..,3?l'^?1'#13ffiH //TRUE COPYII SECTION OFFICER To,
1. The lX additional Judicial Firslclass Maqistrate Cvberabad at Medchal '.7 Z. flie '3 r,, ri' House Officer, Petbasheerabad Police Station' Cyberabad
a. ff|r'3'b. to the Public Prosecutor' High court for the state of relangana' at Hvderabad (OUT) , lil,""c"; il F rl Arun Kumar' Advocate [oPUC] 5, Twc Lti ' ."j:eS t.." DLIY,,A/fr1,2 '/'
HIGH COURT DATED: 04i06r?'176
ORDER
CRLP.No.8141 of 2026 DISPOSING Oi' liiE CRIMINAL PETITION H
E U
s o ( )o (J J I
li ?rspi,rc., zo A * * ::\ ((} g \'l I G I 1b