Telangana High Court

CRLP/8160/2026 of Salla Arvind Babu, Vs The State of Telangana, on 4 June 2026

Cites 1, Cited by 0

COURT FOR THE STATE OF TELANGANA AT HYDERABAD THE HON’BLE SRI JUSTICE SUDDALA CHALAPATHI RAO CRIMINAL PETITION No.8160 of 2026 DATE : 04.06.2026 Between: Salla Arvind Babu and another. …Petitioners/Accused Nos.1 & 2 AND The State of Telangana, Rep. by Public Prosecutor, High

IN THE HIGH COURT FOR THE STATE OF TELANGANA AT

HYDERABAD

THE HON’BLE SRI JUSTICE SUDDALA CHALAPATHI RAO

CRIMINAL PETITION No.8160 of 2026

DATE : 04.06.2026

Between:

Salla Arvind Babu and another.

…Petitioners/Accused Nos.1 & 2

AND

The State of Telangana, Rep. by Public Prosecutor, High Court for the State of Telangana at Hyderabad.

…Respondent

Citations and Judicial Treatment

No citing decisions in the index yet

Cited by

0

Decisions in the index citing it

Cites

1

Decisions referred to

In this index

1

Of the decisions it cites

Overruled / Questioned

0

No negative treatment found

Loading the citing and cited decisions…

ORDER:

This Criminal Petition is filed under Section 482 of the Bharatiya Nagarik Suraksha Sanhita, 2023 (for short ‘BNSS’) by the petitioners/accused Nos.1 and 2 seeking to enlarge them on Anticipatory Bail in the event of their arrest in Crime No.335 of 2026 of Adilabad-II Town Police Station, Adilabad District, registered for the offences punishable under Sections 420, 447 r/w. Section 34 of the Indian Penal Code.

2. Heard Sri Soma Ravi Kiran Reddy, learned counsel appearing for the petitioners/Accused Nos.1 and 2 as well as Sri Jithender Rao Veeramalla, learned Additional Public Prosecutor appearing on behalf of the respondent - State.

3. Without going into the merits of the case, since the punishment prescribed for the offences alleged against the petitioners are less than seven (07) years, this Court deems it appropriate to direct the petitioners to appear before the Investigating Officer on or before 15.06.2026 between 11:00 a.m. and 05:00 p.m. and in turn, the Investigating Officer is directed to follow the procedure laid down under Section 35 (3) of BNSS (previously Section 41-A of Cr.P.C.) and also the guidelines formulated by the Hon’ble Supreme Court in Arnesh Kumar v. State of Bihar 1 scrupulously. However, the petitioners shall submit their defense and co-operate with the Investigating Officer as and when required by furnishing information and produce all relevant documents/material required for the purpose of the investigation, and the Investigating Officer shall consider the same before filing appropriate report before the learned Magistrate concerned.

4. Accordingly, the Criminal Petition is disposed of.

Miscellaneous applications, if any pending, shall also stand closed. _________________________________________

JUSTICE SUDDALA CHALAPATHI RAO Date: 04.06.2026 adt/dpm

1 (2014) 8 SCC 273

THE HON’BLE SRI JUSTICE SUDDALA CHALAPATHI RAO

CRIMINAL PETITION No.8160 of 2026 Date: 04.06.2026 ADT/DPM

You have used today's free searches. Sign in, for free, to keep searching without a limit.

Compass reads the judgments for you and finds the paragraphs for and against your question. Sign in to use it.

My Vault follows judgments for you and records every later decision that cites them. Sign in to keep one.

Sign in to download the court's PDF. The full text stays free to read here.

Sign in, for free, to download the court copy. Reading the full text here stays open to everyone.

Search and read Indian judgments without limits, save them to My Vault and find the relevant paragraphs with Compass.

Open the sign-in page instead