Telangana High Court
WP/17049/2026 of Dornala Kondal Rao Vs The State of Telangana on 4 June 2026
IN THE HIGH COURT FOR THE STATE OF TELANGANA AT HYDERABAD (Special Original Jurisdiction) THURSDAY, THE FOURTH DAY OF JUNE TWO THOUSAND AND TWENTY SIX PRESENT THE HONOURABLE SRI JUSTICE NAGESH BHEEMAPAKA WRIT PETITION NO: 17049 OF 2026 Between: 1. Dornala Kondal Rao, S/o. Dornala Sharavaiah, Aged
[ 3300 I
IN THE HIGH COURT FOR THE STATE OF TELANGANA
AT HYDERABAD
(Special Original Jurisdiction)
THURSDAY, THE FOURTH DAY OF JUNE
TWO THOUSAND AND TWENTY SIX
PRESENT
THE HONOURABLE SRI JUSTICE NAGESH BHEEMAPAKA
WRIT PETITION NO: 17049 OF 2026
Between:
1. Dornala Kondal Rao, S/o. Dornala Sharavaiah, Aged about 42 Years, Occ.
Business, R/o. 11-20481403, Sri Venkateshwara Paradise, Huda Complex, Kothapet, Saroornagar.
2. Pottabathini Yadagir, S/o. Pentaiah, Aged about 45 Years, Occ. Business, R/o. H.No. 5-136, Padmanagar Colony, Pochampally, Yadadri Bhuvanagiri District.
...PET!TIONERS
AND
1. The State of Telangana, Rep by Principal Secretary, Revenue Department, Secretariat, Hyderabad.
2. The Commissioner, And lnspector General of Stamps and Registration, Mozam jahi Market, Hyderabad.
3. The District Registrar, Ranga Reddy, Ranga Reddy District.
4. The Sub Registrar,Uppal, Medchal-Malkagiri District.
5. Gaddam Venkatesh, S/o. Gaddam Narayana, Aged about 53 Years, Occ.
Business, R/o.H.No.5-133, Padmanagar, Bhudhan Pochampally, Yadadri Bhuvanagiri District.
6. Ch. Dhanunjaya, S/o. Ch. Sattaiah, Aged about 68 Years, Occ. Business, R/o. H. N o. 3 -521 1 0, Vidyanaga r, chouttu ppal, Yadad ri Bhuva nag iri Disti rct.
7. Vanam Narsimha, S/o. V. Parwathalu, Aged about 68 Years, Occ. Business, R/o.H.No.3-11-89, RTC Colony, LB Nagar, Chinthalkunta, Hyderabad.
...RESPONDENTS
Petition under Article 226 of the Constitution of lndia praying that in the circumstances stated in the affidavit filed therewith, the High Court may be pleased to pass an orders, or issue any directions or issue any appropriate writ more particularly in the nature of WRIT OF MANDAMUS declare the action of the 2nd respondent in not considering the representation of the petitioners Dated 15.05.2026
for conduct detailed enquiry against the respondent No. 4 to 6 acting on behalf of the M/s.SRl LAKSHMI DURGA INFRA DEVELOPERS for their forged, fabricated documents and not submitting accounts along with audit report to the existing members and as well as inconsistency in their version by committing fraud to that extent a crime has been registered in Cr.No. 80012025 Dated 18.08.2025 for Offence U/s 316, 318(1),324,336(1), 336(3), 344,351(1) of BNS, which is arbitrary, illegat, violation of the principles of natural justice, violation of Article 14, 19,300-A of the Constitution of lndia.
l.A. NO: 1OF 2026
Petition under Section 151 CPC praying that in the circumstances stated in the affidavit filed in support of the petition, the High Court may be pleased pleased to direct the 2nd respondent to consider representation of the petitioners Dated 15.05.2026 for conduct detailed enquiry against the respondent No. 4 to 6 acting on behalf of the M/s.SRl LAKSHMI DURGA INFRA DEVELOPERS for their forged, fabricated documents and not submitting accounts along with audit report to the existing members and as well as inconsistency in their version by committing fraud to that extent a crime has been registered in Cr.No. 80012025 Dated 18.08.2025 for offence U/s 316, 318(1),324,336(1), 330(3), 344,3s1(1) of BNS, pending disposal of main Writ Petition in the interest of Justice.
Gounse! for the Petitioner: SRl. PRAVEEN KUMAR VEERJALA
counsel for the Respondents No.l To 3: sMT DARA HARTTHA KTRAN, AGP FOR REVENUE REPRESENTTNG GP FOR REVENUE
Counsel for the Respondent No.4 To 6: ....
The Court made the following: ORDER
w:#"Fff,];7
IN THE HIGH COURT FOR THE STATE OF TELANGANA
AT HYDERABAD
THE HONOURABLE SRI JUSTICE NAGESH BHEEMAPAI(A
o,4.0,6.20.26
Between:
Dornala Kondal Rao and another
Petitioners
AIYD
The State of Telangana,
Represented by Principal Secretary, Revenue Department, Secretariat, Hyderabad and 6 others
...Respondents
Citations and Judicial Treatment
Cited by
0
Decisions in the index citing it
Cites
0
Decisions referred to
In this index
0
Of the decisions it cites
Overruled / Questioned
0
No negative treatment found
Loading the citing and cited decisions…
This judgment in the centre: on the left the decisions it cites, on the right the decisions citing it. Colour is the treatment; choose a decision to open it.
ORDER:
This Writ Petition is filed seeking to declare the action of respondent No.2 in not considering the petitioners'representation dated 15.05.2026 for conducting an enquiry against respondent Nos.4 to 6 in relation to alleged. forgery, fraud and financial irregularities, despite registration of Crime No.8O0/2025 dated 18.08.2025, is arbitrary, illegal, violative of the principles of natural justice and Articles 14, 19 and 300-A of the Constitution of India, and consequently to pass appropriate orders.
2. Heard Sri Praveen Kumar Veerjala, learned counsel for the petitioners and Smt Dara Haritha Kiran, learned Assistant Government Pleader for Revenue representing learned Government Pleader for Revenue for respondent Nos.1, 3 and 4. Perused the record. ,
NBK,J wP_t7049 2026
3. Learned counsel for the petitioners made submissions on the lines of writ affidavit and requested this court to direct respondent No.2 to consider the petitioner,s representation dated 15.05.2026 as expeditiously as possible, hearing. a-fter affording them an opportunit5r of 4' Learned Assistant Government preader for Revenue submits that if the said petitioner's representation is still pending for consideration, respondent No.2 may be directed to consider the said petitioner,s representation and pass appropriate orders in accordance with law.
5. In view of the submissions made by the learned counsel appearing on either side, and without expressing any opinion on the merits of the case, this writ petition is disposed of directing respondent No'2 to consider the petitioners' representation dated 15.o5.2026 and pass appropriate orders in accordance with law within a period of four
(04) weeks from the date of receipt ofa copy oft is order, after affording an opportunit5z of hearing to the petitioners and issuing personal notice to respondent No'7. The decision so taken sha, be communicated to the petitioners. No order as to costs. Miscellaneous petitions, if any, pending in this Writ petition, shall stand closed. / SD'- T.SREENIVASA REDDY ISTANT REGISTRAR ,TTRUE COPY" OFFICER 1 . The Principal Secretary, Revenue Department, State of Telangana' Secretariat, HYderabad.
2. Thecommissioner,AndlnspectorGeneralofstampsandRegistration, Mozam iahi Market, HYderabad' To,
){.a.::.i::r:4,:i,,
3. The District Registrar, Ranga Reddy, Ranga Reddy District'
4. One CC to SRl. PRAVEEN KUMAR VEERJAIA, Advocate [OPUCI
5. Two CCs to GP FoR REVENUE, High Court for the State of Telangana, at Hyderabad [OUTI
6. Two CD CoPies DAN TKS,/ \ A
HIGH COURT DATED: 0410612026
ORDER
WP.No.17049 of 2026 VACATION COURT I I
Q- A $$ lu\t t DtspN s o )s * c DISPOSING OF THE WRIT PETITION WITHOUT COSTS et