Telangana High Court
CRLP/8097/2026 of Srinivasulu Reddy Yannam (Srinivas Reddy) Vs The State of Telangana on 4 June 2026
IN THE HIGH COURT FOR THE STATE OF TELANGANA AT HYDERABAD THURSDAY, THE FOURTH DAY OF JUNE TWO THOUSAND AND TWENTY SIX PRESENT THE h -,,}JI)URABLE SRI JUSTICE SUDDALA CHALAPATHI RAO CRIMINAL PETITION NO: 8097 OF 2026 Between: Srinivasulu Reddy Yannam (Srinivas Reddy), S/o. R. Subba Reddy Yannam,
IN THE HIGH COURT FOR THE STATE OF TELANGANA
AT HYDERABAD
THURSDAY, THE FOURTH DAY OF JUNE
TWO THOUSAND AND TWENTY SIX
PRESENT
THE h -,,}JI)URABLE SRI JUSTICE SUDDALA CHALAPATHI RAO
CRIMINAL PETITION NO: 8097 OF 2026
Between:
Srinivasulu Reddy Yannam (Srinivas Reddy), S/o. R. Subba Reddy Yannam, Age. 50 years, Occ. Business, R/o. Plot No.79, Ramalah Nagar, Road No.4, Near Bachupan School, Kukatpally, Hyderabad, Telangana - 500072.
...PETITIONER/ACCUSED No.4
AND
The State of Telangana, Rep. by its Public Prosecutor, High Court for the State ofTelangana at Hyderabad Through SHO, Sanathnagar PS, Hyderabad Distrrct
...RESPONDENT
Petition under Section 482 of BNSS praying that in the circumstances stated in the Memora,ril ,:i Grounds of Criminal Petition, the High Court may be pleased to enlarge the Petitioner/Accused No.4 on bail in the event of his arrest in connection with the Crime. No 28112026 dated 07.05.2026 on the file of Sanathnagar PS, Hyderabad District for the alleged offences under Sections 204,318(2)' 319(2)' 351
r/w 3(5) of the Bharatiya Nyaya Sanhita, 2023 and Sections 66-C, 66-D of the lnformation T611 i ,,-rlegy Act, 2000 and pass such other and further order or orders as this Honolabie -n.rr1 may deem fit and proper in the circumstances of the case This Petition coming on for hearing, upon perusing the Memorandum of Grounds of Criminal Petition and upon hearing the arguments of M/s PILLIX LAW
FIRM, Advocat,- fcr the Petitioner and sri Jithender Rao Veeramalla, the Additional Public Prore; . . ;r behalf of the sole Respondent.
The Court made the following: ORDER
IN THE HIGH COURT FOR THE STATE OF TELANGANA
AT HYDERABAD
THE HON'BLE SRI JUSTICE SUDDALA CHALAPATHI RAO
CRIMINAL PETITION No.8O97 of 2o.26
DATE : o4.06.2026
Between:
Srinivasulu Reddy Yannam (Srinivas Reddy).
...Petitioner/ Accused No.4
AND
The State of Telangana. Rep. by its public prosecutor, High Court ofTelangana, Hyderabad Through SHO, Sanathnagar p.S.. Hyderabad District.
...Respondent
Citations and Judicial Treatment
Cited by
0
Decisions in the index citing it
Cites
0
Decisions referred to
In this index
0
Of the decisions it cites
Overruled / Questioned
0
No negative treatment found
Loading the citing and cited decisions…
This judgment in the centre: on the left the decisions it cites, on the right the decisions citing it. Colour is the treatment; choose a decision to open it.
ORDER:
This Criminal Pctition is filcd under Section 4g2 of Bharatil,a Nagarik Suraksha Sanhita, 2023 (for short ,BNSS,) by the petitioner/ accused No.4 seeking to enlarge him on Anticipator_y llail in the event ol his arrest in Crime No.2g 1 of 2026 of Sanarhnagar police Station. Hyderabad District, registered for the alleged offenccs punishable under sections 2O4, 3lB(2), 319(2), 35i r/u. 3(5) ot Bharatiya Nyaya Sanhita, 2023 and Sections 66-C and 66_D of the Information Technolog, Act, 2008.
!-l
2. Heard Md.Nawaz Hyder Ali, learrred counsel representing Pillix Law Firm, learned counsel appearing lor the petitioner as well as Mr.Jithender Rao Veeramalla, learned Additional Public Prosecutor appearing on behalf of the respondent - State.
3. Without going into the merits of the case, since the punishment prescribed for the offences alleged against the petitioner is less than seven (07) years, this Court deems it appropriate to direct the petitioner to appear belore the Investigating Officer on or before 75.06.2026 between 11:OO a.m. and 05:OO p.m. and in turn, the Investigating Ofhcer is directed to fo11ow the procedure laid down under Section 35
(3) of BNSS (previously Section 41-A of Cr.P.C.) and also the guidelines formulated by the Hontrle Supreme Court in Arnesh Ku'rnc; a. State of Bihor t scrupulously. However, the petitioner shal1 submit his defense and co-operate with the Investigating Ofhcer as and when required by furnishing information and produce all relevant documents / material required lor the purpose of the investigation and the Investigating Officer shall consider the '1zora1s scc zz:
same beforc filing appropriate report before the learned Magistrate concerncd
4. Accordingly, the Criminal Petition rs disposed of. I'lisccllzrne ous applications. if any pending,, sha11 also stand c Ioscd //TRUE COPY// SD/- P.C.SULEKHA DEVI ASSISTANT REGISTRAR E TION OFFICER \ F To, t" /1,4v TP '1 . The Xll Acldl Judicial Magistrate of First Class, Kukatpally, Hyderabad
2. The S:ar- ilouse Officer, Police Station, Sanathnagar, Hyderabad
3. Two CCs to Public Prosecutor High Court for the State of Telangana at Hyderabad (OUT)
4. One CC to M/s PILLIX LAW FIRM Advocate (OPUC)
5. Two CD Copies K/KA
HIGH COURT SCR, J DATED: 0410612026 1 BE SI4 /c /t iJ o
B ).
"'r...:i J UI.I v2
ORDET{ GRLP.No.8097 ot 2026 DISPOSIT.*, OF THE CRIMINAL PETITION .::,, ",(n,,i l. I 7b u