Telangana High Court
CRLP/8059/2026 of B.Raju Kumar @ Raj Vs The State of Telangana, on 4 June 2026
II"I TI-{E HIGH COURT FOR THE STATE OF TELANGANA AT HYDERABAD THURSDAY, THE FOURTH DAY OF JUNE TWO THOUSAND AND TWENTY SIX PRESENT THE HONOURABLE SRI JUSTICE SUDDALA CHALAPATHI RAO CRIMINAL PETITION NO: 8059 OF 2026 Between B.Raju Kurrnar @ Raj, S/o.Sammanna Aged about 30 years Occ. Pvt Job
II"I TI-{E HIGH COURT FOR THE STATE OF TELANGANA
AT HYDERABAD
THURSDAY, THE FOURTH DAY OF JUNE
TWO THOUSAND AND TWENTY SIX
PRESENT
THE HONOURABLE SRI JUSTICE SUDDALA CHALAPATHI RAO
CRIMINAL PETITION NO: 8059 OF 2026
Between
B.Raju Kurrnar @ Raj, S/o.Sammanna Aged about 30 years Occ. Pvt Job R/o.
H.No. 1-6-226, Flat no.405, Sri Sai ram Enclave, Mohan Nagar, Ram Nagar, Hyderabad
...PETITIONER/ACGUSED No.1
AND
The State of Telangana, Rep. by its Public Prosecutor, High Court at Hyderabad, Through SHO, Warasiguda P.S.
. RESPONDENT/COM PLAI NANT
Petition under Section 482 of BNSS praying that in the circumstances stated in the Memorandum of Grounds of Criminal Petition, the High Court may be pleased to enlarge the petitioner/ accused No.1 on bail in the event of his arrest in connection with Crime No. 115 of 2026 of Warasiguda Police Station, Hyderabad in the interest of justice and pass such other order or orders as this Hon'ble court may deem fit and proper in the circurnstances of the case.
This Petition coming on for hearing, upon perusing the Memorandum of Grounds of Criminal Petition and upon hearing the arguments of Sri J K RANJIT
KUMAR, Advccate for the Petitioner and Sri Jithender Rao Veeramalla, the Additional Pi.rui:c il rcsecutor on behalf of the sole Respondent.
The Gourt made the following: ORDER
IN THE HIGH COURT FOR THE STATE OF TELANGANA
AT HYDERABAD
THE HON'BLE SRI JUSTICE SUDDALA CHALAPATHI
RAO
BETWEEN
Sri B.Raju Kumar.
. . .Petitioner/Accused No. I
AND
The State of Telangana.
Respondents
Citations and Judicial Treatment
Cited by
0
Decisions in the index citing it
Cites
0
Decisions referred to
In this index
0
Of the decisions it cites
Overruled / Questioned
0
No negative treatment found
Loading the citing and cited decisions…
This judgment in the centre: on the left the decisions it cites, on the right the decisions citing it. Colour is the treatment; choose a decision to open it.
ORDER:
When the matter is taken up for consideration, learned counsel for the petitioner seeks permission of this Court to withdraw the criminal petition.
2. Learned Additional Public Prosecutor has taken no objection to the same.
3. Permission is accorded.
4. Accordingly, this Criminal Petition is dismissed as withdrawn. Miscellaneous applications, if any pending, shall also stand closed. r\ SD'. P.C.SULEKHA DEVI i55riraNr REGISTRAR i{" ,ITRUE GOPY/ OFFICER ? :i To,
1. The X Addl' Chief Judicial Magistrate at Secunderabad'
2. The station House officer, P;ffiii;ion-, wrtrsiguda, Hyderabad
3. Two ccs to public prosecutJr,iigh c"rttforthe-state of Telangana at HYciera[r'r 'r (OUT) - - -. ..-
4. one cc i" sRl ir nnultT KUMAR Advocate (oPuc) ,|fl 5. Two CD CoPies /#Y vtPwKA
HIGH COURT DATED: A410612026 CRLP No.8059 of 2026 DISMISSING THE CRL HE SI4
3 oo Jttll Z1 =i t * oF.s
,b b I :l @, b