Telangana High Court
CRLP/8165/2026 of Soma Suresh @ Soma Chandan Kumar, Vs The State of Telangana, on 4 June 2026
IN THE HIGH COURT FOR THE STATE OF TELANGANA AT HYDERABAD THURSDAY, THE FOURTH DAY OF JUNE TWO THOUSAND AND TWENTY SIX PRESENT THE I{iiiOURABLE SRI JUSTICE SUDDALA CHALAPATHI RAO CRIMINAL PETIT ION NO: 8165 0F 2026 Between: AND SomaSuresh@SomaChandanKumar,S/oSomaKitaiah,Agedabout36 years, Occ.
IN THE HIGH COURT FOR THE STATE OF TELANGANA
AT HYDERABAD
THURSDAY, THE FOURTH DAY OF JUNE
TWO THOUSAND AND TWENTY SIX
PRESENT
THE I{iiiOURABLE SRI JUSTICE SUDDALA CHALAPATHI RAO
CRIMINAL PETITION NO: 8165 0F 2026
Between:
AND
SomaSuresh@SomaChandanKumar,S/oSomaKitaiah,Agedabout36
years, Occ. Piivate Employee, R/o.H.No.1-80, Nazeeb Nagar Moinabad Mandal, Ranga ReddY District.
...PETITIONER/ACCUSED NO.S
The State of Telangana, Rep. by Public Prosecutor, High court for the State of Telanrlarla at Hyderabad, Through SHO, PS Shadnagar
...RESPONDENT/COMPLAINANT
Petition under Section 480 & 483 of BNSS praying that in the circumstances stated in the fulenrorandum of Grounds of Criminal Petition, the High Court ma-y- be pi""*J t,i . , '1e Petitioner/ accused No.5 on regular bail in Crime No 1135 of )OZS ot Shadnagar Police Station, Cyberabad Commissionerate, registered forthe offencesunderS.-ections103(2)140(1-),238,61(2)r/w3(5)BNSandSection3(2)(v)
of the SC/ST (POA) Amendment Act, 20'15, pending investigation/trial, on such terms and conclitions as this Hon',ble court may deem fit and proper in the interests of justice This Petition coming on for hearing, upon perustng the Memorandum- of Grounds of Criminal Petition and upon hearing ine arguments of Sri PORIKA VIKAS
RAJ, Advocate for the petitioner and sri Jithlnder Rao Veeramalla, the Additional Public Prosec. i: ':n behalf of the sole Respondent'
The Court made the following: ORDER
IN THE HICH COURT FOR THE STATE OF TELANGANA
AT HYDERABAT)
THE HON'BLE SRI JUSTICE SUDDALA CHALAPATHI
RAO
CRIMINAL PETITION No.8l65 OF 2026
DATE OF ORDER:- 04.06.2026
BETWEEN:
Sri Soma Suresh
. . . Petitioner/Accused No.5
AND
The State of TelanEana
. . . Respondents
Citations and Judicial Treatment
Cited by
0
Decisions in the index citing it
Cites
0
Decisions referred to
In this index
0
Of the decisions it cites
Overruled / Questioned
0
No negative treatment found
Loading the citing and cited decisions…
This judgment in the centre: on the left the decisions it cites, on the right the decisions citing it. Colour is the treatment; choose a decision to open it.
ORDER:
When the matter is taken up for consideration, leamed counsel for the petitioner seeks permission of this Court to withdraw, the criminal petition.
2. Learned Additional Public Prosecutor has taken no objection to the same
3. Penrrission is accorded
-
4. Accordingly, this Criminal Petition is dismissed as withdrawn. Miscellaneous applications, if any pending, shall also stand closed. To, /ITRUE COPY// SD/. P.C.SULEKHA DEVI ASSISTANT REGISTRAR s CTION OFFICER
1. The Addr tidicial Magistrate of First Class, at Shadnagar Z. fn. S , , iiouse Officer' Shadnagar Police Station' Cyberabad Commissionerate,
g. iwo CCs to public Prosecutor, High Court for the State of Telangana at Hyderabad (OUT) +. oir" cC tc sRt poRtxe VIKAS RAJ Advocate (oPUc)
5. Twc CD C.;pies 4L TPI(KA
z TA m s il c E H
HIGH COURT DATED .;..i",{5/2026
ORDER
GRLP.tru,i,,,., ,<i5 of 2026 o oU ( U J I ,T P v^ ib,'\{e DISMISSING THE CRL.P. AS WITHDRAWN
I L g b 6(rf *