Telangana High Court
CRLP/8155/2026 of Mohammad Saleem, Vs The State of Telangana, on 4 June 2026
IN THE HIGH COURT FOR THE STATE OF TELANGANA AT HYDERABAD THURSDAY, THE FOURTH DAY OF JUNE TWO THOUSAND AND TWENTY SIX PRESENT THE HON'BLE SRI JUSTICE SUODALA CHALAPATHI RAO CRIMINAL PETITION NO:8 155 0F 2026 Between: MohammadSaleem,s/o.sharfuddin,Agedabout50years'Occupalion' Scrap Business,
[ 3485 I
IN THE HIGH COURT FOR THE STATE OF TELANGANA
AT HYDERABAD
THURSDAY, THE FOURTH DAY OF JUNE
TWO THOUSAND AND TWENTY SIX
PRESENT
THE HON'BLE SRI JUSTICE SUODALA CHALAPATHI RAO
CRIMINAL PETITION NO:8 155 0F 2026
Between:
MohammadSaleem,s/o.sharfuddin,Agedabout50years'Occupalion'
Scrap Business, R/o.H.No.32-130, Plot No 45/A, Survey No'272' Asha Residency, IDA Jeedimetla, Hyderabad - 500 055'
."PETiTIONER/ACCUSED No'7
AN
TheSiaieofTelangana,,RepresentedbyitsPublicProsecutor,HighCourtfor the state of Telaigana, Hyderabad, (Through the station House officer, Narayankhed P.S., Sangareddy District.)
...RESPONDENT/COMPLAINANT
Petitton uil;et Section 480 & 483 of BNSS praying that in the circumstances stated in the Memorandum of Grounds of criminal Petition, the High court may_be pi""r"O to enlarge the Petitioner/Accused No 7, namely Mohammad.Saleem' .S/o SnarfuOOin, on r6gular bail in connection with Crime No. 8412026 of Narayankhed iotice Station Sa-ngareddy District, registered for the offences punishable under Sections 3o5ir,r ;r r,i 1 I t o? tre Bharatifa Nyaya Sanhita ' 2023 and Sections 25(1)
and 25(1A) of the Arms Act, 1959.
Petitir_,1 l , rjr section 480 & 483 of BNSS praying that in the circumstances stated in the lvlemorandum of Grounds of criminal Petition, the High court may be pieaseo for the reasons stated in the interim bail petition Enlarge the Petitioner /
n."r."O No.7, namely Mohammad Saleem, S/o Sharfuddin' aged about -50
years'
on interim bail for a fiied period on medical grounds, in connection with Crime No'
AatiOZA of l.lai i; .r rkhed Police Station, Sangareddy District, pending disposal of the main Criminal Petttion.
This Petition coming on for hearing, upon perusing the -Memorandum of Grounds of Criminal Petitlon and upon hearing the arguments of Sri Veera, Babu Gandu, Adv,rc:,. : {or the Petitioners and Additional Public Prosecutor on behalf of
I.A. NO: 1 OF 2026
the Sole ResPcr' -.i:ttt.
The Court made the foilowing: ORDER
IN THE HIGH COURT FOR THE STATE OF TELANGANA
AT HYDERABAD
THE HON'BLE SRT JUSTICE SUDDALA CHALAPATHI RAO
CRIMINAL PETITION No.8l55 of 2026
Datez 04.06.2026
Between:
Mohammad Saleem
AND
The State of Telar-rgana.
Represented b_v its Public Prosecutor,
High Court for the State of Telangana, Hyderabad, (Through the Station House Officer, Narayankhed P.S., Sangareddy District.)
Petitioner
. . . Respondent
Citations and Judicial Treatment
Cited by
0
Decisions in the index citing it
Cites
0
Decisions referred to
In this index
0
Of the decisions it cites
Overruled / Questioned
0
No negative treatment found
Loading the citing and cited decisions…
This judgment in the centre: on the left the decisions it cites, on the right the decisions citing it. Colour is the treatment; choose a decision to open it.
ORDER:
Sangareddy District, for the alleged offence under Sections 305(b) and 11 1 ol the BNS, 2023 and Sections 25(1) and 25(1,4) of the Arms Act. 1959
2. Heard Sri Veerer Babu Gandu, learned counsel for the petitioner/ accu sed No.7 as ',r'ell as learned Additional Public
1. The petitioncr is arravcd as accused No.7 in Crime No.84 12026 on thc l'ilc ol' Narir-var-rkhed Policc Station, Prosecutor appearing 1or thc' r-cspondcnt Statc
3. The brief facts of the case are that a DCM vehicle bearing Registration No.AP 28 Ttl-3708 was parked near Shekar (Jai -- SCR, J Crlp 8155 2026 Ganesh) Tyre Puncture Shop at Manoor X Road, Narayankhed Town, Sanga Reddy District, and accused Nos. 1 and 2 committed theft of the said DCM vehicle and sold to accused No.3 through mediator/ accu sed No.4 Rs.3 lakhs to gain mone], illcgall,v. and obtained money of
4. The petitioner is arrayed as accused No.7, whose main source of livelihood is doing scrap work. The a-llegation levered against him is that he received the stolen property from accused Nos.1 and 2 through accused Nos. 5 and g and thereafter sold the same to third parties to gain money illegally.
5. Learned counsel for the petitioner u,ould contend that there '*,as a delay of 2 days to lodge report arld that the case was initially registered against the unknown offender as reflected in remand case diary. Subsequently, the petitioner/ accused No.7 and other accused were implicated in the case.
6. Learned counsel for the petitioner / accused No.7 would further contend that there are no specific overtacts against the petitioner and sought enlargement of the petitioner/ accused No.7 on bail.
SCR, J Crlp 8155 2026
7. Learned Additional Public Prosecutor would contend that although the petitioner does scrap work, has got active connivance s'tlh thc othtrr accutscd in commission of the oflfence'
8. trvidentiy, as it appears from the remand report and from the submissions of the lcarncd Additional Public Prosecutor that the cntire investigation is at primary stage. and if the petitioner/ accused No.7 is enlarged on bai1, it will be severely detrimental to the investigation. as the police authorities have to gather appropriate cr.iclcncc and thus, it is not a fit case for granting baiI at this stage.
9. In that vicu' ol' the matter, it is not a fit case for granting and enlarging the petition er/ accused No.7 on bail and the criminal petitior-r de',.oid of merits and is 1iable to be dismissed.
10. 'lhis Cnminal Petitron is dismissed. However, the petitioner is at hbertl'to renew thc application after a while As a sequel. misccliancous petitrons pending, if anl', shall stand closed f,?iS,'H:'"t'[HlX SECTION OFFICER SD/. AHM AS \ ,/TRUE COPY/' I Iffi iY ffi : lH Hi ?J"'Hi'ilf'?:[T i:l'? ?':31'',fili'i;'']'' -' arkais i r i D istr i ct atK r:r- ' '^a To, rrf _=-i. I@r'i.-:. -:ig
3. The Sraii,,i: llouse officer, Narayankhed Police station, sangareddy District
4. One CC to Sri Veera Babu Gandu' Advocate [OPUC]
5. Two CCs to PUBLIC PROSECUTOR High court for the state of Telangana, at Hyderabad [OUT]
6. Two CD Cooies KAlv'],;..:, Y{-
HIGH COURT DATED: 0410612026
ORDER
CRLP.No.8155 of 2026 t + 5o (-l OO JljNil6 ,' 7-o J: .\ rl * DISMIS':" -i THE CRIMINAL PETITION eb t t oE!pl.rr- .d 4 &. yl 1 E 5IA o