Telangana High Court
CRLP/8146/2026 of K.Maipal Vs The State of Telangana, on 4 June 2026
I |]L HIGH COURT FOR THE STATE OF TELANGANA AT HYDERABAD THURSDAY, THE FOURTH DAY OF JUNE TWO THOUSAND AND TWENTY SIX PRESENT THE HONOURABLE SRI JUSTICE SUDDALA CHALAPATHI RAO CRIMINAL PETITION NO: 8146 OF 2026 Between: AND K, Maipal -ci c Narsimulu, Occ. R/o. Annasagar Village, Damargidda
I 34851
iI,i I |]L HIGH COURT FOR THE STATE OF TELANGANA
AT HYDERABAD
THURSDAY, THE FOURTH DAY OF JUNE
TWO THOUSAND AND TWENTY SIX
PRESENT
THE HONOURABLE SRI JUSTICE SUDDALA CHALAPATHI RAO
CRIMINAL PETITION NO: 8146 OF 2026
Between:
AND
K, Maipal -ci c Narsimulu, Occ. R/o. Annasagar Village, Damargidda Mandal, Naray;,, r 5.',, . :ji-,ct.
...Petitioner/Accused No.5
The Stat. . I Telangana,, Rep. by its Public Prosecutor, High Court of Telangana I-irgi'r Court Buildings, Hyderabad, Through Station House Officer, Shadnagar PS,Ranga Reddy District
...RespondenUComPlainant
The Court made the following: ORDER
Petition unc,t,,, section 482 of BNSS praying that in the circumstances stated in the Memorandum of Grounds of criminal Petition, the High court may be pleased to eniarge the petitioneriAs on anticipatory bail in the event of his arrest in connection with FIR No. 289 ol 2026 on the file of SHO, Shadnagar Police Station, Ranga Reddy District This Petition coming on for hearing, upon perusing the Memorandum of Grounds of criminal Petition and upon hearing the arguments of sri v Brahmaiah chowdary, Advocate for the Petitioner and sri Jithender Rao Veeramalla, Additional Public Prosecutor on behalf of Respondent.
IN THE HIGH COURT FOR THE STATE OF
TELANGANA AT HYDERABAD
THE HON'BLE SRI JUSTICE SUDDALA CHALAPATHI RAO
CRIMINAL PETITION No.8146 of 2026
DATE: 0,4.06.2026
Between:
Sri K. Maipal.
. .. Petitioner / Accused No'5
AND
The State of Telangana, Rep. bf its Public Prosecutor, High Court of i'elangana, High Court Buildings, Hiderabad, Through Station House Officer, Shadnagar PS. Ranga Reddr Dist rict .
. "ResPondent/ ComPlainant
Citations and Judicial Treatment
Cited by
0
Decisions in the index citing it
Cites
0
Decisions referred to
In this index
0
Of the decisions it cites
Overruled / Questioned
0
No negative treatment found
Loading the citing and cited decisions…
This judgment in the centre: on the left the decisions it cites, on the right the decisions citing it. Colour is the treatment; choose a decision to open it.
ORDER:
lhts Crtt;rttta.l l)(t(rtiorl is liicci unrlcr Scctlon 482 ol Bharatiya Nagaril< Suraksha Sanhlta, 2O2:\ by the Peti tioner/ Accu sed No.5 seeking anticipatory bail in conrrection with t'-lR No.289 of 2026 of Shadnagar Police Station, F'uturc CiLl' District, registered for the offenccs punishable uncler Se,ctions 318(a), 310(2) rlw Section 6l (21 of the lih aratir,'a Nvava Sanhita,2023.
1--!F t-
Crl.P.No.8146 of 2O26 SCR,J
2. Heard Sri v. Brahmaiah Chowdary, learned counsel appearing lor the petitioner as well as Sri Jithender Rao Veeramalla, learned Additional Public Prosecutor appearing on behalf ol the resPondent- S tate.
3. When the matter is taken up for hearing, learned counsel for the petitioner submitted that the accused Nos.1 and 2 have already been released on regular bail. It is further submitted that, insofar as accused Nos.7 and 8 are concerned, the Investigating Officer has issued notices under 35 (3) of the BNSS (previous)y, Scction 41-A of Criminal Procedure Code). Therefore, he prayed the Court to grant pre- arrest bail to the petitioner by allowing this Criminal Petition.
4. On the other hand, Iearned Additional Public Prosecutor opposed the submissions made by the learned counsel for the petitioner, contending that the said case pertains to the offence of dacoitv and that the specific role attributed to the petitioner/ accused No.S in the commission of the alleged offence is clearly reflected in the FIR as well as in the remand report pertaining to accused Nos.1 and 2. It is further contended that the petitioner is not entitled to be released on J Crl.P No 81{6 oi .202{:) SCR..i bail at this sragc, i1s such, i'ie praled rhc Court to dismiss the crirninal petition.
5. In thc' Iight ol rhe submissions made by both the learncd counsel and lrpon purtrsal of thc material available on record, this Court rs of rhe consrdered vieu, that specific and serious allegations have. been levelled against the petirioner1accused No.5. Ilaving regarcl to the overall facrs and circumstances of rhe case. the gravity of the alleged offcnce and the specilic role attributed to the petitioner, this Colrrt is not inclirLed to grant bail to the petitioner/ accused No. rj aL thls stagc.
6. Accordinglr.. the Criminai Petrtion is dismissed clos<'d Nl iscclkLn c'or-rs irpplrr--a tion s, il anv pending, shall stancl //TRUE COPY// SD/- B.REKHA RANI ASSISTANT REGISTRAR SECTION OFFICER To, l,TheAdditionalJudicialFirstClassMagistrateatShadnagar
2. The Sta*'" f-f ous" orfic"r, Station House Officer' Shadnagar PS'Ranga Redrj,'-: tt
3. One CC to Sri V Brahmaiah Chowdary' Advocate [OPUC]
4. Two CCs to PUBLIC PROSECUTOR High Court for the State of Telangana' at HYderabad [OUT]
5. Tw: -i ':1: u.
HIGH COURT DATED: fitutfl2026
ORDER
CRLP.No.u'I46 o12026 DISMISSING THE CRLP s,,. \: l)s:r.znr\ -- r-,f' r\- p o t 1$E sIA16 [B JUN?6 ) CJ 72o .L lLr * r p b b G /1t-1