Telangana High Court
CRLP/8163/2026 of Kududula Nambaiah, Vs The State of Telangana, on 4 June 2026
IN THE HIGH GOURT FOR THE STATE OF TELANGANA AT HYDERABAD THURSDAY, THE FOURTH DAY OF JUNE TWO THOUSAND AND TWENTY SIX PRESENT THE HONOURABLE SRI JUSTICE SUDDALA CHALAPATHI RAO CRIMINAL PET NO:8163 oF 2026 Between Kududula Nambaiah, S/o. Mallaiah, Aged about 73 years, Occ: Farmer, R/o H.No. 6 -
[ 3485 I
IN THE HIGH GOURT FOR THE STATE OF TELANGANA
AT HYDERABAD
THURSDAY, THE FOURTH DAY OF JUNE
TWO THOUSAND AND TWENTY SIX
PRESENT
THE HONOURABLE SRI JUSTICE SUDDALA CHALAPATHI RAO
CRIMINAL PET
NO:8163 oF 2026
Between
Kududula Nambaiah, S/o. Mallaiah, Aged about 73 years, Occ: Farmer, R/o H.No. 6 - 43. Ivlallpur Village and Mandal, Jagtial District, Telangana.
(Presently in Jagtial Sub Jail)
...PETITION ER/ACCUSED
AND
The State of Telangana, Represented by the Station House Officer, Mallapur Police Station, Jagtial District, Through the Public Prosecutor, High Court for the State of Telangana, Hyderabad.
... RES PON DE NT/CO M P LAI NAN T
Petition under Section 480 and 483 of BNSS., praying that in the circumstances stated in the Memorandum of Grounds of Criminal Petition, the High Court may be pleased to enlarge the Petitioner/accused, Kududula Nambaiah, on bail in connection with Crime No. 71 of 2026 dated 11.04.2026, on the file of Police Station, Mallapur, Jagtial District, '--r' ;ilch terms and conditions as this Hon ble Court may deem fit and proper in the interest of justice.
This Petition coming on for hearing, upon perusing the Memorandum of Grounds of Criminal Petition and upon hearing the arguments of Sri Madas Bharath Chandra, Advocate for thr Petitioner and the Additional Public Prosecutor for the State of Telangana on behalf of the Sole Respondent.
The Court made the following: ORDER
IN THE HIGH COURT FOR THE STATE OF TELANGANA
AT HYDERABAD
THE HON'BLE SRI JUSTICE SUDDALA CHALAPATHI RAO
No.8
Date: o,4.06.2o26
Between:
Kududula Nambaiah
. . . Petitioner/ accused
AND
The State of Telangana,
Represented by the Station House Officer, Mallapur Police Station, Jagtial District, Through the Public Prosecutor, High Court for the State of Telangana, Hyderabad.
. . . Re spondent/ comPlainant
Citations and Judicial Treatment
Cited by
0
Decisions in the index citing it
Cites
0
Decisions referred to
In this index
0
Of the decisions it cites
Overruled / Questioned
0
No negative treatment found
Loading the citing and cited decisions…
This judgment in the centre: on the left the decisions it cites, on the right the decisions citing it. Colour is the treatment; choose a decision to open it.
ORDER:
1. The petitioner is arrayed as sole accused in Crime No.7ll2026 on the file of Mallapur Police Station, Jagitial District, for the alleged offence under Section 103(1) of the BNS, 2023.
2. Heard Sri Madas Bharath Chandra, learned counsel for the petitioner/accused as well as learned Additional Public Prosecutor appearing for the respondent - State.
SCR, J Crlp_8163_2026
3. The brief facts of the case are that on 11.04.2026 the defacto-complainant lodged a complaint with the porice stating that the petitioner/accused indiscriminately beat his mother on her face and forehead with his hands and pushed her down with an intention to kill her, due to which her mother sustained bleeding injuries and succumbed to the said injuries. Thus, requested to take necessary action.
4. Learned counsel for the petitioner would contend that the entire investigation has been completed and a false case was filed against the petitioner/accused and the witnesses have already been examined and that the petitioner was arrested and remanded to judicial custody on 12.04.2026, and has been languishing in the judicial custody since then.
5. Per contra, learned Additional public prosecutor would contend that serious allegations are made out against the petitioner/accused, that he has caused the death of his own mother by indiscriminately beating her on her nose and forehead, so as to kill her. 6 Evidently, the said contentions of the learned Additional Public Prosecutor are supported by the remand report along '-7 SCR. J Crlp_8163_2026 with the investigation, which prima facie, reveal that grave allegations are leveled against the petitioner. At this stage, since the investigation is still in progress, the criminal petition filed by the petitioner/accused is not fit for consideration and lacks merit, and accordingly liable to be dismissed.
7. In the facts and circumstances above stated, the criminal petition stands dismissed. As a sequel, miscellaneous petitions pending, if any, shail stand closed. SDr- MOHD.ISMAIL DEPUTY REGISTRAR // ,ITRUE COPY/' A SECTION OFFICER To Pr/KA
1. The stati:n llouse officer, Malrapur Police station, Jagtial District'
2. Two ccs to public prosecutor, High court for the State of Telangana' at HYderabad [OUT]
3. One CC to Sri' Madas Bharath Chandra' Advocate [OPUC]
4. Two CD Cocies \q-
HIGH COURT DATED: 041OG12026
ORDER
CRLP.No.8163 ot 2026 DISMISSING THE CRL.PETITION VACATION COURT I r{E STA t t CH o 0I JIJN 2U6 I Eo .b .'/ .*tan nk* *