Telangana High Court
WP/16901/2026 of Mohammed Kareemuddin Vs The State of Telangana on 29 May 2026
Kareemuddin, S/o. Late. yousufuddin, Age.56 years, occ.Business, R/o. H. No. 1-32, prkit Viilage and na"norr, Nizamibad oistrici. -' IN THE HIGH COURT FOR THE STATE OF TELANGANA AT HYDERABAD (Special Original Jurisdiction) FRIDAY, THE TWENW NINTH DAY OF MAY TWO THOUSAND AND TWENTY SIX
[ 3485l
Mohammed Kareemuddin, S/o. Late. yousufuddin, Age.56 years, occ.Business, R/o. H. No. 1-32, prkit Viilage and na"norr, Nizamibad oistrici. -'
IN THE HIGH COURT FOR THE STATE OF TELANGANA
AT HYDERABAD
(Special Original Jurisdiction)
FRIDAY, THE TWENW NINTH DAY OF MAY
TWO THOUSAND AND TWENTY SIX
PRESENT
THE HONOURABLE SRI JUSTICE SUDDALA CHALAPATHI RAO
WRIT PETITI ON NO:169 1oF 2026
...PETITIONER
AND
Between:
. The Station House
Nizamabad District.
The State oJ Telangana,..represented by its principal Secretary, Home Department, Secretariat Buildings, Hyderabad.
The Commissioner of police, Nizamabad, Nizamabad proper and District.
Officer, Balkonda Rural police Station, Balkonda,
4. The circle lnspector of police, Balkonda Rural, Balkonda, Nizamabad District.
5. Nerella Ravinder, S/o. Narsaiah, Age.50 years, Occ.Business, R/o. Anksapur Village, Velpoor Mandal, Nizamabad proper and Dishict.
...RESPONDENTS
Petition under Articre 226 of the constitution of rndia praying that in the circumstances stated in the affidavit filed therewith, the High court may be pleased to issue an order or direction more particularly one in the nature of writ of mandamus or any other appropriate writ declaring the action of the respondent No's. 3 and 4 in calling the petitioner to the police station and threatening him to get setfle the issues with the respondent No. 5 as per his dictates, otherwise the petitioner has to face dire consequences is nothing but depriving the personar riberties and arso arbitrary, illegal, null and void and violative of principles of natural justice and also violative of Articles 14, 19 and 21 of the constitution of rndia. consequenfly direct the respondent No's' 3 and 4 not to call the petitioner to the police station and not to threaten and pressurize him to get settle the issues with the respondent No. 5.
l.A. NO: 1 OF 2026
Petition under section 151 cPC praying that in the circumstances stated in the affidavit filed in support of the petition, the High court may be pleased to direct the respondent No's' 3 and 4 not to call the petitioner to the police station and not to threaten and pressurize him to get setile the issues with the respondent No. 5.
Counsel for the petitioner: SRI K.VENUMADHAV
Counsel for the Respondent Nos.1 to 4: Gp FOR HOME
Counsel for the Respondent No.S: - - _
The Court made the following: ORDER
a
iI
i
l
l,
IN THE HIGH COURT FOR THE STATE OF TELANGANA
AT HYDERABAD
THE HON'BLE SRI JUSTICE SUDDALA CHALAPATHI RAO
WRIT PETITION No.169O1 of 2o126
DATEz 29.O5.2o.26
Between:
Mohammed Kareemuddin
Petitioner
AND
The State of Telangana,
Represented by its Principal SecretarTr, Home Department, Secretariat Buildings, Hyderabad & four others
Citations and Judicial Treatment
Cited by
0
Decisions in the index citing it
Cites
0
Decisions referred to
In this index
0
Of the decisions it cites
Overruled / Questioned
0
No negative treatment found
Loading the citing and cited decisions…
This judgment in the centre: on the left the decisions it cites, on the right the decisions citing it. Colour is the treatment; choose a decision to open it.
ORDER:
Respondents This Writ Petition is filed under Article 226 of the Constitution of India, seeking the following relief:- " ... to declare the action of the respondent Nos.i and 4 in calling the petitioner to the police station and threatening him to get settle the issues with the respondent No.5 as per his dictates, otherwise the petitioner has to face dire consequences is nothing but depriving the personal liberties and also arbitrary, illegal, null and void and violative of principles of natural justice and also violative of Articles 14, 19 and 21 of the Constitution of India. Consequently direct the respondent Nos.3 and 4 not to call the petitioner to the police station and not to threaten and pressurize him to get settle the issues with the respondent No.5..."
2. Heard learned counsel for the petitioner and learned Assistant Government Pleader for Home, for the respondent Nos. 1 to 4. Perused the record.
3. The grievance of the petitioner is that, without there being any cognizable offence committed by the petitioner, the respondents-police authorities are repeatedly calling the petitioner to the police station and are threatening the petitioner to settle the dispute with the respondent No.S.
4. On the other hand, learned Assistant Government Pleader for Home would submit that the police authorities are neither calling the petitioner to the police station nor threatening him to settle the dispute with the respondent No.5. authorities are directed to follow the due procedure established under law. However, in the absence of any cognizable offence being made out against the petitioner, the respondent police shall not unnecessarily call the petitioner to the police station or interfere in the civil disputes between the parties.
5. In that view of the matter, the respondents-police J
Accordingly, the Writ petition is disposed of. There shall be no order as to costs. Miscellaneous petitions, if aly are pending, shall stand closed //TRUE COPYII SD/-T, SRINIVASA REDDY ASSISTANT REGISTRAR SECTION OFFICER I I To, PMK BS l The Principar secretary, Home Department, secretariat Buirdings, Hyderabad. 2,TheCommissionerofPolice,Nizamabad,NizamabadProperandDistrict. 3' The Station House officer, Barkonda Rurar police station, Barkonda, 1' Nizamabad District. 4' The circle rnspector of porice, Barkonda Rurar, Barkonda, Nizamabad District.
5. One CC to SRt K.VENUMADHAV, Advocate tOpUCl
6. Two CCs to Gp FOR HOME, High Court for the State of Telangana, at Hyderabad [OUT]
7. Two CD Copies
DATED: 29lOSt202G WP.No.16901 of 2026 DISPOSING OF THE WRIT PETITION HIGH COURT VACATION COURT r2D s a' ( t=i E t+
fA ta, i,,' 0E,L:i 2 \\+- 'tr.. '\. ;Y .. :. l. Fc' ..--.. -.+1.".i - .-! .. b b
?