Telangana High Court
WP/17023/2026 of Perasani Srinesh Vs The State of Telangana on 29 May 2026
IN THE HIGH COURT FOR THE STATE OF TELANGANA AT HYDERABAD (Special Original Jurisdiction) FRIDAY, THE TWENry NINTH DAY OF MAY TWO THOUSAND AND TWENTY SIX PRESENT THE HONOURABLE SRl JUSTICE SUDDALA CHALAPATHI RAO IT PETIT N NO: 17023 F Between: Perasani Srinesh, S/o. Perasani Venkata Rama Rao, Aged
[ 3485 J
IN THE HIGH COURT FOR THE STATE OF TELANGANA
AT HYDERABAD
(Special Original Jurisdiction)
FRIDAY, THE TWENry NINTH DAY OF MAY
TWO THOUSAND AND TWENTY SIX
PRESENT
THE HONOURABLE SRl JUSTICE SUDDALA CHALAPATHI RAO
IT PETIT
N NO: 17023
F
Between:
Perasani Srinesh, S/o. Perasani Venkata Rama Rao, Aged about 2Z years, Occ. Pvt. Employee, R/o. H.No.2-73, Gollapudi Village, Wyra Mandal, Khammam District - 507 165.
...PETITIONER
AND
The State of Telangana, Rep. by its Principal Secretary, Transport Dept, Secretariat, Hyderabad.
The Depot Manager, TSRTC, Kothagudem Bus Depot, Kothagudem, Kothagudem District.
The Branch Manager, Union Bank of lndia, H.No.9-45-23, Main Road, Tanikella Branch, Konijerla Mandal, Khammam Diskict.
The Authorized Signatory, United lndia lnsurance Company Limited, property Casualty Hub, MRO 2, Maker Bhavan, 1st Floor, Veer Nariman Road, Mumbai.
District Consumer Disputes Redressal Commission, Khammam, Khammam District, Rep. by its President.
Perasani Sudha Shiva Kumari, , D/o. Ramachandraiah, Aged about 54 years, Occ. Housewife, R/o. Tanikella Village, Konijerla Mandal, Khammam District.
...RESPONDENTS
Petition under Article 226 of the Constitution of lndia praying that in the circumstances stated in the affidavit filed therewith, the High Court may be pleased to issue appropriate writ, order or direction, more particularly, in the nature of Writ of Mandamus declaring the orders, dated 15.04.2026 in C.C.No.43 ol 2025 passed by the sth respondent by considering the complaint of 6th respondent, to pay the assured amount of Rs.1 ,00,00,000/- with interest of Tpercent per annum, Rs.20,000/-towards damages, Rs.10,000/- towards cost, in respect of death claim of deceased Perasani Venkata Rama Rao, without having any right to the complainant
o
and without impleading the petitioner being the son and legal heir of the deceased Perasani Venkata Rama Rao in c.c.No.43 of 202s, as iilegar, arbitrary, against to the principles of natural justice and violation of Articles 14, 1g and 21 of the constitution of lndia and consequently to set aside the same directing the 6th respondent to implead the petitioner in c.c. No.43 of 2o2sfor proper adjudication of the case l,A. NO: 1 OF 2026
Petition under section 151 cPC praying that in the circumstances stated in the affidavit filed in support of the petition, the High court may be pleased to suspend the orders dated 15.04.2026 in c.c.No.43 of 2o2s of the 5th respondent forthwith, pending disposal of the above writ petition counsel for the petitioner: sRr. KADARU PRABHAKAR RAo counsel for the Respondent No. 1: Gp FoR TRANSPORT
Counsel for the Respondent No.2: SC FOR TSRTC
Counsel for the Respondent Nos. 3to6:-_
The Court made the following: ORDER
I
n
l
IN THE HIGH COURT FOR THE STATE OF TELANGANA
AT HYDERABAD
THE HON'BLE JUSTICE SRI SUDDALA CHALAPATHI RAO
of
DATE: 29.05.2o26
Between:
Perasani Srinesh
...Petitioner
AND
The Stat" 5f T.lat gatta,
Rep. by its Principal Secretar5r,
Transport Department,
Secretariat, Hyderabad and 5 others
...Respondents
Citations and Judicial Treatment
Cited by
0
Decisions in the index citing it
Cites
0
Decisions referred to
In this index
0
Of the decisions it cites
Overruled / Questioned
0
No negative treatment found
Loading the citing and cited decisions…
This judgment in the centre: on the left the decisions it cites, on the right the decisions citing it. Colour is the treatment; choose a decision to open it.
ORDER
Heard Mr.Kadaru Prabhakar Rao, learned counsel for the petitioner, learned Government Pleader for Transport appearing for respondent No.l and learned Standing Counsel for TSRTC appearing for respondent No.2.
2. Learned. counsel appearing for the petitioner sought permission to withdraw the writ petition. To that effect, he made an endorsement on the case bundle on 29.05.2026. \
withdrawn. There shall be no order as to costs.
3. Permission is accorded.
4. Accordingly, this Writ Petition is dismissed as Miscellaneous Petitions, pending if any, shall stand closed. SD/.M. NAGAMANI //TRUE COPY// REGISTRAR ECTION OFFICER To, BM BS
1. One CC to SRI. KADARU PRABHAKAR RAo Advocate toPUC] 2' Two ccs to GP FoR TRANSPORT Hlgn court ioi tn" s'tate of retangana, at Hyderabad [OUT] 3' one cc to STANDTNG couNSEL FoR TSRTC topucl
4. Two CD Copies &
) HIGH COURT DATED: 2910512026 WP.No.17023 of 2026 VACATION COU T)ac s 0t ru[2W E t g z )t , rcH ISSING THE WRIT PETITION AS WITHDRA c nlT o ,ltlr'e