Telangana High Court

WP/16877/2026 of S. Bharatamma Vs The State of Telangana on 29 May 2026

Cites 0, Cited by 0

THE HIGH COURT FOR THE STATE OF TELANGANA AT HYDERABAD (Special Original Jurisdiction) FRIDAY, THE TWENry NINTH DAY OF MAY TWO THOUSAND AND TWENTY SIX PRESENT THE HONOURABLE SRIJUSTICE SUDDALA CHALAPATHI RAO WRIT N NO: 16877 oF 2026 Between: S. Bharatamma, Wo. Komuraiah, Age. 54 Years, Occ. Fair

[ 34851

IN THE HIGH COURT FOR THE STATE OF TELANGANA

AT HYDERABAD

(Special Original Jurisdiction)

FRIDAY, THE TWENry NINTH DAY OF MAY

TWO THOUSAND AND TWENTY SIX

PRESENT

THE HONOURABLE SRIJUSTICE SUDDALA CHALAPATHI RAO

WRIT

N NO: 16877 oF 2026

Between:

S. Bharatamma, Wo. Komuraiah, Age. 54 Years, Occ. Fair Price Shop dealer, Shop No. 2053920, 'Chinna Mulkanoor Village, Chigurumamidi Mandal, Karimnagar District.

.,.PETITIONER

AND

1. The State of Telangana, represented by its Principal Secretary, C-ons.umer Affairs, Food and civil supplies Department, Secretariat Buildings, Hyderabad.

2. rhe Revenue Divisional officer, Karimnagar Division, Karimnagar Proper and district.

3. The Tahsildar, chigurumamidi Mandal, chigurumamidi Proper and Mandal, Karimnagar District.

...RESPONDENTS

Petition under Article 226 of the constitution of lndia praying that in the circumstances stated in the affidavit filed therewith, the High Court may be pleased to issue an order or direction more particularly one in the nature of writ of mandamus or any other appropriate writ declaring the action of the respondent No. 2 in passing theordersinProc.Ref.No.Cll135012026,dated15-05-2026,suspendingthe authorization of the petitioner's fair price shop No. 2053920, Chinna Mulkanoor Village, chigurumamidi Mandal, Karimnagar Diskict, without considering the explanation submitted by the petitioner dated 04-03-2026 to the show cause notice dated 28-02-2026 and without conducting any enquiry and without giving any opportunity of hearing to the petitioner, is nothing but arbitrary, illegal, null and void and violative of Articles 14, 19 and 21 of the constitution of India. consequenfly set aside the same, thereby direct the respondent authorities to suppry the commodities to the petitioner's fair price shop enabring her to suppry the same to the card horders.

l.A. NO: 1 oF 2026

Petition under section i51 cpc praying that in the circumstances stated in the affidavit filed in support of the petition, the High court may be preased to suspend the orders passed by the respondent No. 2 in proc. Ref. No. c1l13s0/2026 dated 15-05-2023, thereby direct the respondents No.2 and 3 to suppry the commodities to the petitioner fair price shop No. 2os3g2o, chinna Murkanoor Viilage, chigurumamidi Mandar, Karimnagar District, enabring to suppry the commodities to the card holders Counsel for the Petitioner: SRI K.VENUMADHAV

Counsel for the Respondents: Gp FOR CIVIL SUPPLIES

The Court made the following: ORDER

IN THE HIGH COURT FOR THE STATE OF TELANGANA

nflTiItlqir[#rD

THE HON'BLE JUSTICE SRI SUDDALA CHALAPATHI RAO

WRIT PETITION lto.16877 of 2o26

S.Bharatamma

I

I

AND

The State ofTelangana,

Rep. by its Principal Secretarlr,

Consumer Affairs, Food and Civil Supplies Department, Secretariat Buildings, Hyderabad and two others on29.O5.2026.

3.

Permission is accorded.

made an endorsement on the case bundle

Heard Mr.K. Venumadhav, learned counsel for the petitioner and learned Government Pleader for Civil Supplies for respondents.

2.

l,earned Counsel appearing for the petitioner sought permission to withdraw the writ petition. To that effect, he

2

4. Accordingly, this Writ Petition is dismissed as withdrawn, There shall be no order as to costs.

Miscellaneous petitions, if any, pending shall stand closed.

SD/-HUSSAIN ALI

A SISTANT REGISTRAR

,/TRUE COPY//

SECTION OFFICER

1. One CC to SRI K.VENUMADHAV, Advocate IOPUC]

2. Two CCs to GP FOR CIVIL SUPPLIES, High Court for the State of Telangana, at Hyderabad [OUT]

3. Two CD Copies

To,

PMK

BS

I

I

!

HIGH COURT

DATED i 2910512026

Citations and Judicial Treatment

No citing decisions in the index yet

Cited by

0

Decisions in the index citing it

Cites

0

Decisions referred to

In this index

0

Of the decisions it cites

Overruled / Questioned

0

No negative treatment found

Loading the citing and cited decisions…

ORDER

VACATION COURT -{ E 'r) :J_i f*: r.^ (\.- r \, *n u:l _s \s WP.No.16877 of 2026 ot!, * DISMISSING THE WRIT PETITION AS WITHDRAWN WITHOUT COSTS \xb @ b\b ,{; H$

You have used today's free searches. Sign in, for free, to keep searching without a limit.

Compass reads the judgments for you and finds the paragraphs for and against your question. Sign in to use it.

My Vault follows judgments for you and records every later decision that cites them. Sign in to keep one.

Sign in to download the court's PDF. The full text stays free to read here.

Sign in, for free, to download the court copy. Reading the full text here stays open to everyone.

Search and read Indian judgments without limits, save them to My Vault and find the relevant paragraphs with Compass.

Open the sign-in page instead