Telangana High Court
WP/16877/2026 of S. Bharatamma Vs The State of Telangana on 29 May 2026
THE HIGH COURT FOR THE STATE OF TELANGANA AT HYDERABAD (Special Original Jurisdiction) FRIDAY, THE TWENry NINTH DAY OF MAY TWO THOUSAND AND TWENTY SIX PRESENT THE HONOURABLE SRIJUSTICE SUDDALA CHALAPATHI RAO WRIT N NO: 16877 oF 2026 Between: S. Bharatamma, Wo. Komuraiah, Age. 54 Years, Occ. Fair
[ 34851
IN THE HIGH COURT FOR THE STATE OF TELANGANA
AT HYDERABAD
(Special Original Jurisdiction)
FRIDAY, THE TWENry NINTH DAY OF MAY
TWO THOUSAND AND TWENTY SIX
PRESENT
THE HONOURABLE SRIJUSTICE SUDDALA CHALAPATHI RAO
WRIT
N NO: 16877 oF 2026
Between:
S. Bharatamma, Wo. Komuraiah, Age. 54 Years, Occ. Fair Price Shop dealer, Shop No. 2053920, 'Chinna Mulkanoor Village, Chigurumamidi Mandal, Karimnagar District.
.,.PETITIONER
AND
1. The State of Telangana, represented by its Principal Secretary, C-ons.umer Affairs, Food and civil supplies Department, Secretariat Buildings, Hyderabad.
2. rhe Revenue Divisional officer, Karimnagar Division, Karimnagar Proper and district.
3. The Tahsildar, chigurumamidi Mandal, chigurumamidi Proper and Mandal, Karimnagar District.
...RESPONDENTS
Petition under Article 226 of the constitution of lndia praying that in the circumstances stated in the affidavit filed therewith, the High Court may be pleased to issue an order or direction more particularly one in the nature of writ of mandamus or any other appropriate writ declaring the action of the respondent No. 2 in passing theordersinProc.Ref.No.Cll135012026,dated15-05-2026,suspendingthe authorization of the petitioner's fair price shop No. 2053920, Chinna Mulkanoor Village, chigurumamidi Mandal, Karimnagar Diskict, without considering the explanation submitted by the petitioner dated 04-03-2026 to the show cause notice dated 28-02-2026 and without conducting any enquiry and without giving any opportunity of hearing to the petitioner, is nothing but arbitrary, illegal, null and void and violative of Articles 14, 19 and 21 of the constitution of India. consequenfly set aside the same, thereby direct the respondent authorities to suppry the commodities to the petitioner's fair price shop enabring her to suppry the same to the card horders.
l.A. NO: 1 oF 2026
Petition under section i51 cpc praying that in the circumstances stated in the affidavit filed in support of the petition, the High court may be preased to suspend the orders passed by the respondent No. 2 in proc. Ref. No. c1l13s0/2026 dated 15-05-2023, thereby direct the respondents No.2 and 3 to suppry the commodities to the petitioner fair price shop No. 2os3g2o, chinna Murkanoor Viilage, chigurumamidi Mandar, Karimnagar District, enabring to suppry the commodities to the card holders Counsel for the Petitioner: SRI K.VENUMADHAV
Counsel for the Respondents: Gp FOR CIVIL SUPPLIES
The Court made the following: ORDER
IN THE HIGH COURT FOR THE STATE OF TELANGANA
nflTiItlqir[#rD
THE HON'BLE JUSTICE SRI SUDDALA CHALAPATHI RAO
WRIT PETITION lto.16877 of 2o26
S.Bharatamma
I
I
AND
The State ofTelangana,
Rep. by its Principal Secretarlr,
Consumer Affairs, Food and Civil Supplies Department, Secretariat Buildings, Hyderabad and two others on29.O5.2026.
3.
Permission is accorded.
made an endorsement on the case bundle
Heard Mr.K. Venumadhav, learned counsel for the petitioner and learned Government Pleader for Civil Supplies for respondents.
2.
l,earned Counsel appearing for the petitioner sought permission to withdraw the writ petition. To that effect, he
2
4. Accordingly, this Writ Petition is dismissed as withdrawn, There shall be no order as to costs.
Miscellaneous petitions, if any, pending shall stand closed.
SD/-HUSSAIN ALI
A SISTANT REGISTRAR
,/TRUE COPY//
SECTION OFFICER
1. One CC to SRI K.VENUMADHAV, Advocate IOPUC]
2. Two CCs to GP FOR CIVIL SUPPLIES, High Court for the State of Telangana, at Hyderabad [OUT]
3. Two CD Copies
To,
PMK
BS
I
I
!
HIGH COURT
DATED i 2910512026
Citations and Judicial Treatment
Cited by
0
Decisions in the index citing it
Cites
0
Decisions referred to
In this index
0
Of the decisions it cites
Overruled / Questioned
0
No negative treatment found
Loading the citing and cited decisions…
This judgment in the centre: on the left the decisions it cites, on the right the decisions citing it. Colour is the treatment; choose a decision to open it.
ORDER
VACATION COURT -{ E 'r) :J_i f*: r.^ (\.- r \, *n u:l _s \s WP.No.16877 of 2026 ot!, * DISMISSING THE WRIT PETITION AS WITHDRAWN WITHOUT COSTS \xb @ b\b ,{; H$