Telangana High Court
WP/16854/2026 of Smt. Turupu Parvathamma Vs The State of Telangana on 29 May 2026
IN THE HIGH COURT FOR THE STATE OF TELANGANA AT HYDERABAD (Special Original Jurisdiction) FRIDAY, THE T\ A /ENry NINTH DAY OF MAY TWO THOUSAND AND TWENW SIX PRESENT THE HONOURABLE SRI JUSTICE SUDDALA CHALAPATHI RAO WRIT PETITION O: 16854 OF 2026 Between: AND 1. 2. 3. Smt. Turupu Parvathamma, W/o.
IN THE HIGH COURT FOR THE STATE OF TELANGANA
AT HYDERABAD
(Special Original Jurisdiction)
FRIDAY, THE T\A/ENry NINTH DAY OF MAY
TWO THOUSAND AND TWENW SIX
PRESENT
THE HONOURABLE SRI JUSTICE SUDDALA CHALAPATHI RAO
WRIT PETITION
O: 16854 OF 2026
Between:
AND
1.
2.
3.
Smt. Turupu Parvathamma, W/o. Late Chandra Reddy Aged about. 86 Years, Occ. Household, R/o. Bahadurguda Village, Shamshabad Mandal, Ranga Reddy Dishict.
...PETITIONER
The State of Telangana, Rep. by its Principal. Secretary, Home Department, Secretariat, Hyderabad.
The Station House Officer, Shamshabad Police Station, Shamshabad Mandal, Ranga Reddy District.
Sri.Turupu indrasena Reddy, S/o Late Chandra Reddy, Aged about . 61
Years, Occ. Agriculture, R/o.Bahadurguda Village, Shamshabad Mandal, Ranga Reddy District.
Edula Ranga Swamy Reddy, S/o Venkata Ranga Reddy Aged about. 64
Years, Occ. Business,
Edula Rajasekhar Reddy, S/o Edula Ranga Swamy Reddy Aged about. 35
Years, Occ. Business Both R4 and R5 are Rl/o.H.No.81-289-1-3-8, Ramakrishna Nagar, Kaluru, Kurnool, Andhra Pradesh-s18003.
...RESPONDENTS
Petition under Article 226 ol the Constitution of lndia praying that in the circumstances stated in the affidavit filed therewith, the High Court may be pleased to issue a Writ, Order or Direction one more particlualry in the nature of Writ of Mandamus a) Declaring the action of the Respondent No.2 in interfering with the civil disputes between the Petitioner and the Respondent Nos.3 to 5 in relation to agricultural land in Sy.No.80/ AA, admeasuring Gts and Sy.No.81/ AA, admeasuring Ac.O-04 Gts, totally admeasuring Ac.00-20 Gts, situated at Pedda Golconda Village, Shamshabad Mandal, Ranga Reddy District. and trying to adjudicate and mediate with the unofficial Respondents, as being bad, arbihary, illegal and violative of Article 14, 19 and 21 of the Constitution of lndia and.b) Consequentially restrain the Respondents, particularly Respondent No.2, from interfering in the civil dispute pertaining to the lands of the Petitioner and from harassing or summoning the Petitioner to the Police Station in connection with the civil disputes in relation to agricultural land in Sy .No.80/ AA, admeasuring Ac.O-16 Gts and Sy.No.81/ AA, admeasuring Ac.O-04 Gts, totally admeasuring Ac.00-20 Gts, situated at Pedda Golconda Village,Shamshabad Mandal, Ranga Reddy District
l.A. NO: 1OF 2026
Petition under Section 151 CPC praying that in the circumstances stated in the affidavit filed in support of the petition, the High Court may be pleased to pass such other Order and Orders as this Honourable Court may be pleased to direct the Respondent No.2 not to interfere with the civil disputes or life and liberty of the Petitioner by either mediating or adjudicating any dispute in relation to agricultural land in Sy.No.80/ AA, admeasuring Ac.0-16 Gts and Sy.No.81/ AA, admeasuring Ac.0-04 Gts, totally admeasuring Ac.00-20 Gts, situated at Pedda Golconda Village, Shamshabad Mandal; Ranga Reddy District Counsel for the Petitioner: SRl. R ANURAG
Counsel forthe Respondent Nos. 1&2:GP FOR HOME
Counset for the Respondent Nos.3to5: -
The Court made the following: ORDER
IN THE HIGH COURT FOR THE STATE OF TELANGANA
AT HYDERABAD
THE HON'BLE SRI JUSTICE SUDDALA CHALAPATHI RAO
TIIRIT PETITION No.16854 of 20.26
DATEz 29.05.20.26
Between:
Smt.Turupu Parvathamma.
...Petitioner
AND
State of Telangana,
Represented by its Principal Secretar5r, Home Department, Secretariat,Hyderabad & four others
...Respondents
Citations and Judicial Treatment
Cited by
0
Decisions in the index citing it
Cites
0
Decisions referred to
In this index
0
Of the decisions it cites
Overruled / Questioned
0
No negative treatment found
Loading the citing and cited decisions…
This judgment in the centre: on the left the decisions it cites, on the right the decisions citing it. Colour is the treatment; choose a decision to open it.
ORDER:
This writ Petition is filed under Article 226 0f the Constitution of India, seeking the following relief:- " ...a) to declare the action o/ the Respondent No.2 in interfering with the civil disputes between the Petitioner and the Respondent Nos.-i to 5 in relation to agricultural land in Sy.No.80/AA' admeasuring Ac.I-16 Gt.s and Sy No.8l/AA, admeasuring Ac.0-04 Grc, romlly admeasuring Ac.00-20 Gts, situated at Pedda Golconda Village, Shamshabad Mandul, Ranga Reddy District, and trying to adjudicate and mediate with the unfficial Respondents as being bad, arbitrary, illegal and violative of Article 14, 19 and 2l of the Constitution of India and
b) Consequentially restrain the Respondents. particularly Respondent No.2 fronr interfering in the civil dispute pertaining to the land.s <tf the Petitioner uncl .frrtm hura.s.sing or summoning the Petitioner t<t lhe Polic'a Stutitttt itt c'rtnnac'tirtn u)ilh the civil dispule.s in relation to agriculturul lund in Sy-.No.B0/AA, udrueusuring Ac-0- t6 Gts and Sy No.8liAA, admeasuring Ac.0-01 Gts, totally - admeasuring Ac.00-20 Gts, situated at pedda Golconda village, Shamshabad Mandal, Ranga Reddy District ... "
2. Heard learned counsel for the petitioner and lea_rned Assistant Government Pleader for Home for respondent Nos. 1 and 2. Perused the record.
3. The grievance of the petitioner is that, the 2nd respondent- police authorities at the behest of respondent Nos.3 to 5 are interfering with the civil dispute in respect of agricultural land admeasuring Ac.0-16 Gts in Sy.No.gO/AA and land admeasuring Ac.0-04 Gts in Sy No.gl/AA, totally admeasuring Ac.00-20 Gts, situated at pedda Golconda Village, Shamshabad Manda.l, Ranga Reddy District.
4. On the other hand, learned Assistant Government Pieader for Home, on instructions, would submit that on 07.05.2026, respondent No.5 lodged a complaint against the petitioner and on such complaint, petition entry uide Acknowledgement No.FCTY/SHBADZ_CYB/070526IOOSTO dated 07.05.2026 was made. During the course of enquiry, it was revealed that there are boundary disputes in respect of the subject property and the same is civil in nature. Moreover, it was found that the civil suit i.e., O.S.No.246 of 2026 is pending before the concerned Cyil Court, at Rajendranagar, Ranga
Reddy District. Hence, the respondent No.S',s complaint, dated 07.05.2026, was closed and the parties were directed to approach the competent Court. It is further submitted that except conducting enquiry, the respondent authorities did not interfered in the civil disputes between the parties.
5. In that view of the matter, the respondent-police authorities are directed not to interfere in the civil disputes between the parties without foltowing the due procedure as contemplated under law.
6. Accord.ingly, thg writ Petition is disposed of. There shall be no'order as to costs. Miscellaneous petitions, if any are pending, shall stand closed. SD'-HUSSAIN ALI ANT REGISTRAR ,,TRUE COPY'/ TION OFFICER
1. The PrinciPal. Secretary' Home DePartment, , T.S.,HYderabad
2. The Station House Officer, Shamshabad Police Station, Shamshabad To, Bm BS [t/landal, Ranga ReddY District'
3. One CC to SRl. R ANURAG Advocate [OPUC]
4. Two ccs to Gp FoR HOME H6;-'corrt f'or the state of Telangana' at Hyderabad [OUT]
5. Two CD CoPies &
HIGH COURT DATED: 2910512026
ORDER
WP.No.16854 of 2026 VACATION COURT iT'. 'tl{E 5 f O 6 JUil 2U6 c Jo ,J A t t)tspcr( -.=: .- . DISPOSING OF THE WRIT PETITION WITHOUT COSTS @,,, I t,, t-l I ) I o a