Telangana High Court

WP/16915/2026 of A. Raju Chary Vs The State of Telangana on 29 May 2026

Cites 0, Cited by 0

THE HIGH COURT FOR THE STATE OF TELANGANA AT HYDERABAD (Special Original Jurisdiction) FRIDAY, THE TWENTY NINTH DAY OF MAY TWO THOUSAND AND TWENTY SIX PRESENT THE HONOURABLE SRI JUSTICE SUDDALA CHALAPATHI RAO NO: 1 6915 q 2026 Between 1. 1 .t i, chary, s/o. Dasharath chary Aged about 40 years,

IN THE HIGH COURT FOR THE STATE OF TELANGANA

AT HYDERABAD

(Special Original Jurisdiction)

FRIDAY, THE TWENTY NINTH DAY OF MAY

TWO THOUSAND AND TWENTY SIX

PRESENT

THE HONOURABLE SRI JUSTICE SUDDALA CHALAPATHI RAO

NO: 1 6915 q 2026

Between

1. 1 .t i, chary, s/o. Dasharath chary Aged about 40 years, occ. Goldsmith sai complex, General Bazar, secunderatao. R/o. Adarrnnrg"i cotony, Road !o.4,.Uppal Medchal - Malkajgiri Disitrct.

2' Kashinath Shivaji Shinde, Slo. Sfrivali Shanker Shinde Aged about 25 years, Occ' Goldsmith Garshan Nagar Sri New Balaji Gold shop, Dilsuknagar. R/o.

Gautam Nagar colony, Dilsuk-hnagar. Medchal - MalkajgiriDistrict.

AND

...PET|T|ONERS

The state of relangana, Rep. by its principal secretary, Home Department, Secretariat Hyderabad.

The Commissioner of police, Rachakonda.

The Station House Officer, Uppal police Station.

The station House officer, saroornagar police station.

The station Hguser officer, pattabiram police station, Guntur Commissionerate, Andhra pradesh.

Mr. Nagender, s/o. Not Known to petitioner presenfly working as sub - lnspector of Police PS. pattabiram station, Guntur, Andhra pradesh.

...RESPONDENTS

Petition under Article 226 of the Constitution of lndia praying that in the circumstances stated in the affidavit filed therewith, the High Court may be pteased to issue an appropriate Writ or order or direction, more particularly one in the nature of the writ of mandamus declaring the action of Respondent No.5 and 6 in summoning the petitioner's to Guntur police station and visiting the shop premises of the petitioner's in plain cloth on Dated. 15.05.2026 from 2 pM to g pM without following the due process of law as being illegal, arbitrary and violative of Article 14

and 21 of the constitution of lndia.

2.

3.

4.

E

6.

i

\

\

l.A. NO: 1 OF 2026

Petition under section 151 cPc praying that in the circumstances stated in the affidavit filed in support of the petition, the High court may be preased to direct the No' 2 to 5 to fotlow the due process of law and not to.interfere with the life and personal liberty of the petitioners pending disposar of the above writ petition.

counser for the petitioners: sRr KADTRE AJrrH REDD'

counsel for the nespona"ni rrii".r To 5: AGp FOR HOME

counset for the nesironJ;il ii;, --

The Court made the following: ORDER

TN THE HIGH COURT FOR THE STATE OF TELANGANA AT

HYDERABAD

THE HON

URABLE SRI JUSTICE SUDDALA CHALAPATH I RAO

WRIT PETITION No.l6915 of 2026

29th MAY,2026

Between:

l. Mr.A. Raju Chary, S/o.Dasharath Chary, aged about 40 Years, Occ: Goldsmith, Sai Complex, Gener al Bazar,' Secunderabad.

R/o.Adarsh Nagar Colony,,Road No.4,

Uppal, Medchal Malkajgiri District.

2. Kashinath Shivaji Shinde, S/o. Shivaii Shanker Shinde'

aged about 25 Years, Occ: Goldsmith, Garshan Nagar, Sri New Balaji Gold shop, Dilsuknagar.

R/o. Gautam Nagar Colony, Dilsukhnagar,

Medchal - Malkajgiri District.

...Petitioners

and

The State of Telangana, Rep. by its Principal Secretary, Home Department,Secretariat, Hyderabad and 5 others.

...Respondents

Citations and Judicial Treatment

No citing decisions in the index yet

Cited by

0

Decisions in the index citing it

Cites

0

Decisions referred to

In this index

0

Of the decisions it cites

Overruled / Questioned

0

No negative treatment found

Loading the citing and cited decisions…

ORDER

When the matter is taken up for hearing, learned counsel for the petitioners seeks for permission of this Court to withdraw the Writ Petition I ,, with liberty to file fresh petition

2. Learned Assistant Government Pleader for Home appearing for respondent Nos. I to 5 takes no objection to the same.

3. Permission is accorded.

4. Therefore, the Writ Petition is dismissed as withdrawn granting liberty as sought for. There shall be no order as to costs. Miscellaneous petitions, pending if &try, shall stand closed. ,/TRUE COPY,/ SD':A. SREENIVASA REDDY ASSISTANT REGISTRAR SECTION OFFICER G i I To l.oneCCtoSRlKAD|REAJ|THREDDY,Advocate[oP-UC]

2. Two CCs to Cp FOR HOMS, Hign 6ourt for the State of Telangana' at HYderabad' [OUT]

3. Two CD CoPies PSK. BS

HIGH COURT DATED: 29105t202G VACATION GOURT s 1 rtE $r4

ORDER

WP.No.16915 of 202G (o * DISMISSING THE WRIT PETITION AS WTHDRAWN WITHOUT COSTS !i U lrA -t o U N .C; llii I * .) T @ b b 1" rd,

You have used today's free searches. Sign in, for free, to keep searching without a limit.

Compass reads the judgments for you and finds the paragraphs for and against your question. Sign in to use it.

My Vault follows judgments for you and records every later decision that cites them. Sign in to keep one.

Sign in to download the court's PDF. The full text stays free to read here.

Sign in, for free, to download the court copy. Reading the full text here stays open to everyone.

Search and read Indian judgments without limits, save them to My Vault and find the relevant paragraphs with Compass.

Open the sign-in page instead