Telangana High Court

WP/16944/2026 of Aruva Vijayalaxmi Vs The State of Telangana on 29 May 2026

Cites 0, Cited by 0

IN THE HIGH COURT FOR THE STATE OF TELANGANA AT HYDERABAD (Special Original Jurisdiction) FRIDAY, THE TWENTY NINTH DAY OF MAY TWO THOUSAND AND TWENTY SIX PRESENT THE HONOURABLE SRI JUSTICE NAGESH BHEEMAPAKA ANO THE HONOURABLE SRI JUSTICE VAKITI RAMAKRISHNA REDDY WRIT PETITION NO: 169,M OF 2026

[ 3511 I

IN THE HIGH COURT FOR THE STATE OF TELANGANA

AT HYDERABAD

(Special Original Jurisdiction)

FRIDAY, THE TWENTY NINTH DAY OF MAY

TWO THOUSAND AND TWENTY SIX

PRESENT

THE HONOURABLE SRI JUSTICE NAGESH BHEEMAPAKA

ANO

THE HONOURABLE SRI JUSTICE VAKITI RAMAKRISHNA REDDY

WRIT PETITION NO: 169,M OF 2026

Between:

Aruva Vijayalaxmi, Wo A.Krishniah, Aged 42 years, Occ: household, R/o. H.No.

45-'l13t1 , Basvannagadda, Wanaparthy, Mahabubnagar Dist T.S, 509103

Presently residing at Nagole P.No. 30/B Adarsh Nagar, Rangareddy District.

...PETITIONER

AND

1. The State of Telangana, Rep, by its Principal Secretary, The Home Department, Secretariat, Hyderabad.

2. The Commissioner, Rachakonda Commissionerate of Police Malkajgiri Zone Telangana State.

3. The Station House officer, Jawaharnagar Police Station, Medchal Malkajgiri District.

4. The Station House officer, Alwal Police Station, Medchal Malkajgiri District.

5. The Central Crime Station (CCS), Malkajgiri Zone. Rachakonda Commissionerate

...RESPONDENTS

Petition under Article 226 of the Constitution of lndia praying that in the circumstances stated in the affidavit filed therewith, the High Court may be pleased toto issue a writ of Habeas corpus directing the respondents to produce the detenue viz., Aruva Chetan Balu sio A Krishnaiah before this Hon'ble court set him at liberty forthwith by declaring his detention as illegal.

Counsel for the Petitioner: SRI SYED SHARFUDDIN AZHAR

Counsel for the Respondents: THE ADDL. ADVOCATE GENERAL

The Court made the following: ORDER

w9_L6944 2026

NBK, ]

IN THE HIGH COURT FOR THE STATE OF TELANGANA

AT HYDERABAD

THE HON'BLE SRI JUSTICE NAGESH BHEEMAPAKA

AND

THE HON'BLE SRI JUSTICE V. RAMAKRISHNA REDDY

WRIT PETITION No.16944 of 2026

29thMay,2026

Between:

Aruva Vijayalaxmi. Wo A. Krishnaiah

. . . Petitioner

AND

The State of Telangana, and others

Respondents

Citations and Judicial Treatment

No citing decisions in the index yet

Cited by

0

Decisions in the index citing it

Cites

0

Decisions referred to

In this index

0

Of the decisions it cites

Overruled / Questioned

0

No negative treatment found

Loading the citing and cited decisions…

ORDER:

The petitioner is the mother of the alleged detenu, Mr. Aruva Chetan Balu, who is Accused No.2 in FIR No. 514 of 2026 of Alwal police Station, registered for the oflences punishable under Sections 318(4) and 316(2) of the Bharatiya Nyaya Sanhita,2023. She has filed the present writ petition seeking a rvrit of Habeas Corpus directing the respondents to produce her son, alleeing that his detention is illegal. l l. The allegations against the alleged detenu are that he, along with his father (Accused No.1), approached the de facto complainant claiming that they had contacts in the Secretariat and could help him secure employment as a Senior Assistant, and with such promise, the accused wp_15944_2026 NBK, ] allegedly induced the de t-acto complainant to part with an amount of Rs. 1 5,00,000/-, and subsequently started threatening him.

2. Heard Mr. Syed Sharfuddin, leamed counsel for the petitioner, and the leamed Additional Advocate General appearing for the respondent- State. Perused the record.

3. Learned counsel representing the Office of the learned Additional Advocate General produced written instructions dated 27.05-2026, wherein paragraphs 6 to 8 read as follows: "6. lt is submitted that on 26.05.2026, the petitioner's son, who is Accused No.2 (the alleged detenu), voluntarily appeared before the Police Station at about 16:00 hours along with his friend, Mr' Belagandi Shiva Kiran. After completion of interrogation, a notice under Section 35(3) of the BNSS, dated 26.05.2025, was issued to him, and thereafter the alleged detenu, along with his friend, left the Police Station at about 17:30 hours.

7. lt is further submitted that, during the course of enquiry, when the alleged detenu was questioned about the whereabouts of his father, who is Accused No.l in the above crime, he stated that his father was not available. Thereupon, the alleged detenu was informed to direct his father to appear before the lnvestigating Officer for the Purpose of investigation and issuance of notice under Section 35(3) of the BNSS. As on 27.05.2026, Accused No'l had not appeared before the lnvestigating Officer.

8. lt is submitted that the petitioner's husband, namely Accused No.1 in the above crime, is absconding, and efforts are being made to secure his presence. The investigation in the above crime is still in progress."

\t|p 16944 _2026 NSK, ]

4. .{ per,sal ol the r.l'ritten instructions placed before us reveals that. on 26.05.2026 at about l6:00 hours, the alleged detenu (Accused No.2) 'oluntarily appeared befbre the police, accompanied by his friend, Mr. Belagancli Shira Kiran. Thereatier. the police issued a notice under Section 35(j) ol'the B\SS. and the alleged detenu left the police Station at about 17:30 h.urs. Thercfore. it cannot be said that the respondents have illegally detained Vr. Aruva Chetan Balu. the alleged detenu.

5. In r ieu o1- the r'vrirten instructions d,ated 2.7.05.2026, no further orders are reqrrired to be passecl in the present writ petition. 6, Accordingly. the r,r' rit petition is crosecl. No costs. Miscellaneous petitions. ifany. pending in this writ petition shall stand closed. SD/- M. NAGAMANI SISTANT REGISTRAR //TRUE COPY// SECTION OFFICER To,

One CC to SRI SYED SHARFUDDTN AZHAR, Ad Two CCs to THE ADVOCATE GENERAL High Co urt te [oPUC] for the State of Telangana, at Hyderabad [OUT]

3. Two CD Copies BN GJP

HIGH COURT DATED: 2910512026

ORDER

WP.No.16944 of 2026 CLOSING THE WRIT PETITION WITHOUT COSTS 1$E Sra ( tJo 0 6 JirN 2[26 U O6- -.^..((' !i' (r:A' PZ l:}; q5 I *

,l )6 (4,o

You have used today's free searches. Sign in, for free, to keep searching without a limit.

Compass reads the judgments for you and finds the paragraphs for and against your question. Sign in to use it.

My Vault follows judgments for you and records every later decision that cites them. Sign in to keep one.

Sign in to download the court's PDF. The full text stays free to read here.

Sign in, for free, to download the court copy. Reading the full text here stays open to everyone.

Search and read Indian judgments without limits, save them to My Vault and find the relevant paragraphs with Compass.

Open the sign-in page instead