Telangana High Court
WP/16890/2026 of Kailash Chodhary Vs The State of Telangana, on 29 May 2026
THE HIGH COURT FOR THE STATE OF TELANGANA AT HYDERABAD (Special Original Jurisdiction) FRIDAY, THE TWENTY NINTH DAY OF MAY TWO THOUSAND AND TWENry SIX PRESENT THE HONOURABLE SRIJUSTICE NAGESH BHEEMAPAKA WRIT PETITION NO:1 6890 0F 2026 Between: 1. Kailash Chodhary, S/o Sri. Lakharamji Choudhary
[ 33001
IN THE HIGH COURT FOR THE STATE OF TELANGANA
AT HYDERABAD
(Special Original Jurisdiction)
FRIDAY, THE TWENTY NINTH DAY OF MAY
TWO THOUSAND AND TWENry SIX
PRESENT
THE HONOURABLE SRIJUSTICE NAGESH BHEEMAPAKA
WRIT PETITION NO:1 6890 0F 2026
Between:
1. Kailash Chodhary, S/o Sri. Lakharamji Choudhary Aged about 34 years, Occ. Business, R/o Plot No. 51, Agamaya Nagar, Near pralavi Girden, Chintalakunta, L.B. Nagar, Hyderabad ? Hethal Choudhary, Wo Kailash Choudary, Aged about 32 years, Occ:
Business, R/o Plot No.51, Agamaya Nagar, Near pralavi Garden, Chintalakunta, L.B. Nagar, Hyderabad.
...PETITIONER
AND
1 . The State of Telangana,, represented by its Principal Secretary, Municipal Administration and Urban Development Department, Secretariat, Hyderabad.
2. The Greater Hyderabad Municipal Corporation, Rep. by its Commissioner, Tank Bund Road, Hyderabad.
3. Deputy Commissioner of Badangpet, Circle - 16, Badangpet, Hyderabad
...RESPONDENTS
Petition under Article 226 of the constitution of lndia praying that in the circumstances stated in the affidavit filed therewith, the High court may be pleased to issue a writ, order or direction more particularly a writ in the nature of Mandamus declaring the action of the Respondent No 3 in trying to demolish the construction made in Plot No. 1 Part (South Side), 3 East Part (South Side) and 4 South part admeasuring 386.44 Square Yards and Plot No.3 West part (South Side), admeasuring 287 square Yards total admeasuring 673.44 square yards, situated in Survey No. 112, 113, 130, 133 and 134/B, at Satyasai Nagar, Jillelguda Viilage, Barapur Mandar, Ranga Reddy District without considering petitioneis apprication dated 25-05-2026 for regularization under section 455_4 of the G.H.M.G. Act as illegal, arbitrary and violative of principles of natural justice and violative of Articles 14' 21 and 300 A of the constitution of rndia and arso contrary to the provisions of the Greater Hyderabad Municipar corporation Act and consequen,y direct the Respondent No 3 to consider petitioner's apprication dated 25-05-2026 for regularisation by passing speaking orders in the interest of justice.
I.A. NO: 1 OF 2026
Petition under section 151 cpc praying that in the circumstances stated in the affidavit fired in support of the petition, the High court may be preased to direct the Respondents No 3 to consider petitioner's apprication dated 25-05-2026 for regularisation pending disposal of the Writ petition.
Counsel for the Petitioner: SRl. MALIPEDDI SRINIVAS REDDY
Gounsel for the Respondent No 1: Gp FoR McpL ADMN URBAN DEV
counsel for the Respondent No.2& 3: sTANDTNG couNSEL ron-cHrtac The Court made the following: ORDER
IN THE HIGH COURT FOR THE STATE OF'TELANGANA
AT HYDERABAD
THE HON'BLE SRI JUSTICE NAGESH BHEEMAPAI{A
WRIT PETITION No.16890 of2026
DATE OF oRDER: 29.o5.2o.26
BETUIEEN
Kailash ChoudharY & another
...Petitioners
AND
The State of Telangana & 2 others
...Respondents
Citations and Judicial Treatment
Cited by
0
Decisions in the index citing it
Cites
0
Decisions referred to
In this index
0
Of the decisions it cites
Overruled / Questioned
0
No negative treatment found
Loading the citing and cited decisions…
This judgment in the centre: on the left the decisions it cites, on the right the decisions citing it. Colour is the treatment; choose a decision to open it.
ORDER
1 . This Writ Petition is filed seeking to issue Wit of Mandomus declaring the action of respondent No'3 in trying to demolish the construction made in Plot No.1 Part (south side), 3 East part (south side) and 4 south part, admeasuring 386 44 Square yards and Plot No.3 West Part (South side), admeasuring 287 Sq'yards' total admeasuring 673.44 Sq.yards, situated in Sy'Nos' 112, 113' 130' 133 and 134 lB at Satyasai nagar, Jillelguda Village, Balapur Mandal, RR District, without considering the application of the petitioner dated 25.05.2026 seeking regularization under section 455A of GHMC Act, as illegal and arbitrary and consequently to direct respondent No.3 to consider the petitioner's application dated 25.O5.2026 for regularization by passing speaking orders'
2. When the matter is taken up for hearing, learned counsel for the petitioners sought permission to withdraw the Writ petition with a liberty to fi1e a fresh one in view of the changed circumstances.
3. Permission, as prayed for, is accorded
4. Accordingly, the Writ petition is dismissed as withdrawn granting liberty to the petitioners to fi1e a fresh petition. There sha1l be no order as to costs. Miscellaneous petitions pending, if any, shall stand closed. SD/.HUSSAIN ALI ASSISTANT REGISTRAR //TRUE COPY// SECTION OFFICER l One CC to SRI MAL|PEDD| SR|N|VAS REDDY, Advocate tOpUCl 2 rwo ccs to GP FoR MCPL ADMN URBAN DEV, High court for the state of Telangana, at Hyderabad [OUT] 3 One CC to STANDING COUNSEL FOR GHMC Advocate tOpUCI
To,
4. Two CD Copies $ onlr BS
HIGH COURT DATED: 2910512026
ORDER
WP.No.16890 of 2026 DISMISSING THE WRIT PETITION AS WITHDRAWN WITHOUT COSTS VACATION COURT 1o JUN 2026 * 'i A T S Te- e ou q i DtsS, l1.1 .L c