Telangana High Court
WP/16989/2026 of Dara Sathish, Vs The State of Telangana, on 29 May 2026
COURT FOR THE STATE [ 3485l AT (Special Originat Jurisdiction) FRI?IY] THE TWENry NINTH DAY OF MAY TWO THOUSAND AND TWENry SIi PRESENT THE HONOURABLE SRI JUSTICE SUDDALA CHALAPATH! RAO T 1 e Between 1. Dara Sathish, S/o. Sammaiah, Age.36 years Occ.private Employee, R/o._ H.No. 1 -1 71,
IN THE HIGH COURT FOR THE STATE
[ 3485l
AT
(Special Originat Jurisdiction)
FRI?IY] THE TWENry NINTH DAY OF MAY
TWO THOUSAND AND TWENry SIi
PRESENT
THE HONOURABLE SRI JUSTICE SUDDALA CHALAPATH! RAO
T
e
Between
1. Dara Sathish, S/o. Sammaiah, Age.36 years Occ.private Employee, R/o.
_ H.No. 1 -1 71, Narsampet, waraniariierJn"s;;i_sooser
2. Mts. K. A. prakash Wines, nep-Oy its prfiild, Takkallapalti yugandhar S/o fJ,1tr?l?t$?3;, Ase'46 Yd";' o;;'ffislnlss, nro'H.r.ro -"+o6rrt-be, sv"ian,i"'r";;i"il;:iTo#;)1]ff sii,1,1lt1%:-":3:i:J;.,0"r""*,"
H. No. 3-1 0, Enusailu y[r.S^"_, nirorl*",L] "p"i*tagiri Mandat, Narsampet, Warangal, Telangan a_5061 32
4. Dubba Sridevi, Wo. Du.bba Ramesh, Age.6S years, Occ .Business R/o. H.No.
1 4-1 1 -1, Subhash Road, Narsampd W:r";;;ietangana_506 1 32.
5. M/s. Vigneswara Industries, Rep't'its p;;iIi, oroo" Ramesah s/o. Dubba [?Htfl?]"f"X"r3i"r-i6lluldd,;i,;"R1'r,rarresnwar-a-ri:'N;;;"d; 6' M/s. Vinayaka Agro rndustries, Rep by its partner, voma chiranjivi Kumar .S/o.Sudershan, Age.60 years, OcJ .e'r.ir"..'R/". H.No. 443, Chalaoarli _ Vilage, Duggondi Mandai, waiangai, r"i"ng;_!ooggr.
7. Natta Tirupati, S/o. pedda.r,orrrli"ii,;;;:5:;""r., occ.private Emproyee, ft13;. * ),l r"l"k J;-t 03,11i o "ti vi r r"d"'
-
o'ig s o n d i M a nd a r,'
-
ru
" i.l,'p"t,
8. M/s. Sai RestauEnt And Bar, Rep _by its partner, Gande Srinivas S/o. Laxmi Narayana Age.54 - years, Oic.Business,' R/o. H.No. 2_130, Nallabelly,Telangana_506-349.
9. M/s. Bagga Wines, Rgl gt its partner, Karukuri Bharath S/o. Srinu Age.28
IBAl.iN*
tr"iness, R/o. H.No. s_60_142, Nrr.rrp"t, Warangat, Tetansana_
10.M/s. Telangana Wines, Repty its partner, Gande Srinivas S/ o. Laxmi i;:?#fl S3?.11 vears, oic eusilss,' n7o. ru",.",p"t,-'r,i"oT6"i, 1 1. Sri Laxmi Narasimha S*?TV Wineq Rep by its partner, Chalamalla Ramana Reddv s/o. chandra Rggovl ns".s7 v"-Jr.,'ciJ".rirriness, R/o. H.No. st212.
G irn i Bavi, Narsa mpet, wa,.im gir, i"rJn gar!_i66 r sz
AND
PETITIONERS
1. The State of Telanoana, Rep By its principal Secretary, Home Department, ^
TS Secretariat, BRKh Brravan, s'"iili"o,'iiii,rlilo , ffi8,:"#KGenerar "r p"riL, i"i.ig",i:Hi; Lakdikapool, Hyderabad,
3. The Economic Offences
^{ing-.1 at Cyberabad, Rep by its Assistant ff[lj:[""'.
or police, cvoeiaoai eor'i-'6li,ri.sronerate, Gachibowri, Petition under Articre 226 0f the constitution of rndia praying that in the circumstances stated in the affidavit fired therewith, the High court may be preased to issue an appropriate writ, order or Direction, more particurarry a writ of Mandamus' decraring the action of the Respondents more particurarry the Respondent No'3 in issuing notice dated 14.05-2026 under sections g4 0f BNSs, as illegal, arbitrary and unconstitutionar and consequenfly direct the Respondents more particurarry the Respondent No.3 not to interfere with the personar rife and riberty of the petitioners in any manner by setting aside the impugned notice dated 14.05.2026
issued pertaining to the Cr.No.44t2O26 dated 29.04.2026, U/s 318(4), 316(2), 338, 336(3), 340(2), rtw 61(2) of BNS on the fite of (pS EOW Cyberabad).
RESPONDENTS
Petitioners: SRI RAMAVA RAM CHANDRASHE KAR REDDY
Respondent Nos.1 & 2:
Respondent No.3: -
AGP FOR HOME
The Court made the following: ORDER
F
Petition under Section 15't cPC praying that in the circumstances stated in the affidavit fired in support of the petition, the High court may be preased to direct the Respondents more particurarry the Respondent No.3 not to interfere with the personar rife and riberty of the petitioners in any manner, pending disposar of the writ Petition.
Counsel for the
Counsel for the
Counsel for the
IN THE HIGH COURT FOR THE STATE OF TELANGANA
AT HYDERABN)
THE HON'BLE SRI JI'STICE SUDDALA CHALAPATHI RAO
iT,irm
m
Between:
Dara Sathish and 10 others
..Petitioners
AND
of
The State of Telangana
Rep By its Principal Secretarl' Home Department BRKR Bhavan Saifabad Hyderabad and 2 others TS Secretariat .Respondents
Citations and Judicial Treatment
Cited by
0
Decisions in the index citing it
Cites
0
Decisions referred to
In this index
0
Of the decisions it cites
Overruled / Questioned
0
No negative treatment found
Loading the citing and cited decisions…
This judgment in the centre: on the left the decisions it cites, on the right the decisions citing it. Colour is the treatment; choose a decision to open it.
ORDER:
relief: This writ petition is filed seeking to grant the following ,....toissueanappropriateWritorderorDirectionmore pii.utartA a Wni'of Mand.amus declaring tte action of the 'respondeits, more partianlarlg, the respondent No'3 in iss|ing notice d.ated.-14.05.2026 under Section 94 of BiVSg i iUJgd arbitrary and unconstittttional, and consequentlg to direct the respoid.ents, more partiatlarlg, the Respondent io.3 not to inierfere with the personal life and liberty of tlrc petitionersinanymannerbgsettingasidettrcimpugned notice d.ated. IL.OS.ZOZA issued pertaining to the Cr.No.44/2026 dated' 29.04.2026 U/s 318(4), 316(2)' 338' iSa,1s1, 340(2) r/u 61(2) o/BNS on the file of (Police Station Economic Offenes Wing, Cgberabad), and topass such other order or orders..."
2. Heard sri R.chandrashekar Reddy, learned counsel for the petitioners and learned Assistant Government Pleader for Home appearing on behalf of respondent Nos' l &' 2'
3. The grievance of the petitioners is that the respond.ents, without following the procedure envisaged under law, are allegedly threatening and interfering with the petitioners without following due process of law.
4. Be that as it fr?Y, the respondent-authorities are bound to follow the due procedure as contemplated under the Bharatiya Nagarik Suraksha Sanhita, 2023 and other applicable laws. In that view of the matter, the respondents shall not interfere in the day-to-day activities and the civil rights of the petitioners and are bound to follow the due procedure under law.
5. Accordingly, the Writ Petition is disposed of. There shall be no order as to costs. Miscellaneous applications, if any pending, shall stand closed. To //TRUE COPYII SD/.HUSSAIN ALI ASSISTANT REGISTRAR SECTION OFFICER
The Principal Secretary, Homl fenartment' TS SaifaoaJ, Hyderabad, State of Telangana' BRKR Bhavan,
2 The Director Generar of porice, Terangana state, Lakdikapoor, Hyderabad, Telangana State.
3. The Assistant Commissioner -of police, Economic Offences Wing _1 at . Cyberab_ad, Cyberabad. police_Commissioir"i#, -Crct ioowti, Hyderabad.
4. One CC to SRI RAMAVARAM CiarISnnSisKAR REDDY, Advocate loPUcl
5. Two CCs to Gp FOR HOME, High Court for the State of Telangana, at Hyderabad. [OUT]
6. Two CD Copies PSK.
CATION COURT HIGH COURT WP.No.16989 of 2026 SPOSIN OF THE WRIT PETITION STS.
Ei G c l q I