Telangana High Court
WP/16847/2026 of Akshay Neemkar Vs The State of Telangana on 25 May 2026
COURT FOR THE STATE OF TELANGANA AT HYDERABAD (Special Original Jurisdiction) MONDAY, THE TWENTY FIFTH DAY OF MAY TWO THOUSAND AND TWENTY SIX PRESENT THE HONOURABLE SRI JUSTICE NAGESH BHEEMAPAKA WRIT PETITION NO: 16847 OF 2026 Between 1. Akshay Neemkar, S/o. Subhash Neemkar, Aged about 29 years,
ara
t0l
IN THE HIGH COURT FOR THE STATE OF TELANGANA
AT HYDERABAD
(Special Original Jurisdiction)
MONDAY, THE TWENTY FIFTH DAY OF MAY
TWO THOUSAND AND TWENTY SIX
PRESENT
THE HONOURABLE SRI JUSTICE NAGESH BHEEMAPAKA
WRIT PETITION NO: 16847 OF 2026
Between
1. Akshay Neemkar, S/o. Subhash Neemkar, Aged about 29 years, Occ:
Busi ness, N o.7 -2-1 I A, Neemkar Nagar, Sanath nagar, Ameerpet, Hyderabad.
2. Mahaenderkar Rahul, S/o. Mahaenderka Ravinder, Aged about 28 years, Occ:
Business, No. 7 -2-11A, Neemkar Nagar, Sanathnagar, Ameerpet, Hyderabad.
...PETITIONERS
AND
1. The State of Telangana, Rep by its Principal Secretary, Municipal Administration and Urban Department, Secretariat, Hyderabad
2. The Commissioner, Cyberabad Municipal Corporation, National Academy of Construction (NAC) Building in HITEX, Madhapur, Hyderabad
3. The Deputy Commissioner, Dundigal,. Circle-S9, Quthbullapur Zone, Near the Mandal Complex, Gandimaisamma Mandal, Medchal-Malkajgiri District, Telangana - 500043.
4. N Pramod Kumar, S/o Late N Sattaiah, Aged about 66 years, Occ Business, R/o. Shyamlal Building Begumpet Hyderabad. (Not a necessary Party in this petition).
,!
...RESPONDENTS
Petition under Articb 226 of the Constitution of lndia praying that in the circumstances stated in the affidavit filed therewith, the High Court may be pleased to issue an appropriate writ or direc'tion, more particu{arly a Writ in the nature of Mandamus declaring the action of the respondent no. 3 in trying to demolish the structures on 23-5-2026 pursuant to the impugned speaking order vide Lr.No.
1699/TPS/DUND/C-59|CMCI2026 dt. 09lo4.12026 in respect of schedule property i.e.
land admeasuring 726 Sq. yards in Sy no, 221 and 222 situated at Bahadurpally Village, Qutubullapur Mandal, Medchat-Malkajgiri District as illegal, arbitrary and unconstitutional and consequentty direct the 3rd respondent not to demdish the , structures raised over the schedule property i.e. in land admeasuring 726 Sq. yards in Sy no. 221 and 222 situated at Bahadurpally Mllage, Qutubullapur Mandal, Medchal- Malkajgiri District.
l.A. NO: I OF 2026
Petition under Section 151 CPC praying that in the circumstances stated in the affidavit filed in support of the petition, the High Court may be pleased to suspend the impugned speaking order vide Lr.No. 1699/TPS/DUND/C-59lCMCl2026 dt. 09-04- 2026 passed by the 3rd respondent in respect of schedule property i.e. land admeasuringT26 Sq. yards in Sy no.221 and222 situated at Bahadurpally Village, Qutubullapur Mandal, Medchal-Malkaigiri District and further direct not demolish the structures raised over the schedule property mentioned above pending disposat of the above writ petition.
Counsel for tre Petitioner: SRI RAJAGOPALIAVAN TAYI
Counsel for the Respondent No.{: GP FOR MUNICIPAL ADUINISTRATION &
URBAN DEVELOPMENT
Gounsel for the Respondent No.2 & 3: SRI K. SANTHOSH KUMAR, sc REp. FoR
SRI P. KRISHNA REDDY, SC FOR iilUNICIPALITY
Counsel for the Respondent No.4:
The Court made the following: ORDER
I
IN THE HIGH COI'RT FOR THE STATT OF TELITNGANA
AT TTfi)ERABAI)
THE HONOURABLE SRI JUSTICE NAGESH BHEEMAPAKA
WRIT PETITION No.16847 of 2O26
Dated: 25.()5.2026
Betureen:
Mr.Akshay. Neemkar & another
AND
...Petitioners
The State of Telangana,
Rep. By its Principal Secretar5r,
Municipal Administration and Urbari Development, Secretariat, Hyderabad and others.
...Respondents
Citations and Judicial Treatment
Cited by
0
Decisions in the index citing it
Cites
0
Decisions referred to
In this index
0
Of the decisions it cites
Overruled / Questioned
0
No negative treatment found
Loading the citing and cited decisions…
This judgment in the centre: on the left the decisions it cites, on the right the decisions citing it. Colour is the treatment; choose a decision to open it.
ORDER:
This Writ Petition is filed challenging the action of respondent No.3 in issuing impugned speaking order dated os.o4.2026.
2. This writ petition is taken as House Motion.
3. Heard Sri Rajagopallavan Tayi, learned counsel for the petitioner and Sri K.Santosh Kumar, learned St-bnding Counsel representing Mr.P.Krishna Reddy, learned Standing Counsel for Municipality appearing on behalf of respondent No.l. Perused the record. /
4. learned counsel for t]re petitioner submits that I petitioners have applied for two (2) construction permissions for stilt + 2 upper floors each and thereafter clubbed the said 2 building permissions and constructed additional floors. In that regard, respondent authorities have issued speaking order dated 09.04.2026 directing the petitioners to remove the unauthonzed constructions within a period of 15 days failing which the respondent authorities will take appropriate steps to remove the said unauthorized constructions. It is submitted that pursuant to the said notice, petitioner had submitted explanation dated L3.O4.2O26. The main grievance of the petitioner is that though explanation was submitted to respondent No.3 on 13.04 .2026, there was threat of demolition by the respondent authorities.
5. In view of the submissions mad.e by learned counsel appearing on either side and without expressing any opinion on the merits of the case, this Writ Petition is disposed of directing the respondent No.3 to consid.er the exflanation of the petitioner dated L3.O4.2O26 and pass appropriate orders in accordance with law within a period of two (2) weeks from thv, I
To, date of receipt of a copy of this order and communicate the same to the petitioner. Till then, status quo as on date shall be maintained by both tl:e parties. No costs. closed Miscellaneous applications, if Any pending, _qh_all stand : SD'. T. SRIDEVI ASSISTANT REGISTRAR //TRUE COPY'/ OFFICER
1. The Principal Secretary, MunicipalAdministration and Urban Department, The State of Telangana, Secretariat, Hyderabad
2. The Commissioner, Cyberabad Municipal Corporation, National Academy of Construction (NAC) Building in HITEX, Madhapur, Hyderabad
3. The Deputy Commissioner, Dundigal, Circle-S9, Quthbullapur Zone, Near the Mandal Complex, Gandimaisamma l\dandal, Medchal-Malkajgiri District, Telangana - 500043.
4. One CC to SRI RAJAGOPALLAVAN TAYI, Advocate [OPUCI
5. One CC to SRI P. KRISHNA REDDY, SC FOR MUNICIPALITY [OPUC]
6. Two CCs to GP FOR MUNICIPAL ADMINISTRATION & URBAN DEVELOPMENT, High Court for the State of Telangana, at Hyderabad TOUTJ
7. Two CD Copies BN \ )
-r' a HIGH COURT DATEDi 25105l,2026 VACATION COURT B of vz> + $$b la t- 6.2
ORDER
"F WP.No.16847 of 2026 I ,F, + DISPOSING OF THE WRIT PETITION WITHOUT COSTS O I
: I