Telangana High Court
WP/13509/2002 of K.KALYANI,HYD AND 3 OTH Vs MD, CDO HRD DEPT, MUMBAI AND 5 OTH on 6 May 2026
THE STATE OF TELANGANA: AT HYDERABAD' - ispecial Original Jurisdiction) WEDNESDAY , THE EIGHTH DAY OF JUNE TWO THOUSAND AND TWENTY TWO PRESENT WRIT PETI TION NO: 13509 0F 2002 Between: 1. Smt.K.Kalyani, W/o Late Sri K'S R Sastry' 2. K.Rajyalakshmi, D/o. late Sri K'S R Sastry' 3.
HIGH COURT FOR THE STATE OF TELANGANA: AT HYDERABAD
' - ispecial Original Jurisdiction)
WEDNESDAY ,THE EIGHTH DAY OF JUNE
TWO THOUSAND AND TWENTY TWO
PRESENT
WRIT PETI TION NO: 13509 0F 2002
Between:
1. Smt.K.Kalyani, W/o Late Sri K'S R Sastry'
2. K.Rajyalakshmi, D/o. late Sri K'S R Sastry'
3. K.S.Chakravarthy,, W/o Late Sri K S'R'Sastry'
4. K.Adithya Madhav,, S/o Late Sri K'S'R Sastry'
(All are PJo.Moulali, HYderabad)
AND
...PETITIONERS
1. The Managing Director & CDO, HRD Department' Corporate Centre' State eank errav:anl P.9.No.12, Mumbai'
2. The Chief General Manager, State Bank of lndia' Hyderabad'
3. The Deputy General Manager, (Personal & HRD Dept )' SBI VRS Cell'
Hyderabad,
4. The Circle Development officer (Per.& HRD Dept),, SBI VRS Cell'
Hyderabad,
5. The Assistant General Manager,, SBI Region ll Zonal Office' Tirupathi'
Chittoor District.
6. The Branch Manager,.SBl Fathekhanpet Branch' Nellore'
...RESPONDENTS
Petition under Article 226 ol lhe Constitution of lndia praying that in the circumstances stated in ifte aftiOa'it filed therewith' the High Court may be pleasedtoissueawritororderordirectionmoreparticularlyoneinthenatureof writ of mandamus by decra-riig'tn; l"tt"r bearing Nos.5669-222, dated 29.03.2002
and O22BO2O,0, dated AlflZiiOf of the resf,ondents respectively, as illegal, arbitrary, unjust, impropei anJv'rolation of Article 14 of the Constitution oif lndia ;;J'";;;"qJ;nttv oireci the respondents to pav an amount of Rs 9'48'4741 to the p"tit[""ii l"aeivoluntary-R"tii"r.nt scheme (VRS) pertaining to late Sri K.S.R.
Sastry;
THE HONOURABLE JUSTICE G.SRI DEVI
WPMP. NO: 1681 I oF 2002
Petition un,ler Section 151 CPC praying that in the circumstances stated in the affidavit filed in support of the petition, the High Courl may be pleased to expedite the writ petition for early final hearing in the interest of justice.
Counsel for the F'etitioners: SRI B.SITARAMAIAH (Not Present)
Counsel for the Flespondents: SRI K.SRINIVASA MURTHY
The Court made lhe following: ORDER
THE HONOURABLE JUSTICE G. SRI DEVI
WRIT PETITION No.135O9 OF 2OO2
Citations and Judicial Treatment
Cited by
0
Decisions in the index citing it
Cites
0
Decisions referred to
In this index
0
Of the decisions it cites
Overruled / Questioned
0
No negative treatment found
Loading the citing and cited decisions…
This judgment in the centre: on the left the decisions it cites, on the right the decisions citing it. Colour is the treatment; choose a decision to open it.
ORDER:
Though the Writ Petition pertains to the year 2OO2, there is no representation from the petitioners. The matter is listed today under the caption for 'hnal hearing'. In spite of repeated calls, none appears for the petitioners. It seems that the petitioners have no interest to prosecute the case.
2. Hence, the Writ Petition is dismissed for non- prosecution. There shall be no order as to costs. Miscellaneous petitions, if any, pending shall stand closed SD/.K.ONESIM DEPUTY ISTRAR ,TRUE COPY// SECTIO OFFICER To
.3ffi 333SS',:.'AT$'mUfl CI't'+t9:Xf t'":'u"tt""r . Two C.D. CoPies . One SPare CoPY' MRC. ,r{ "//"r
HIGH COURT DATED:08/06/20112
ORDER
WP.No.13509 oI 2002 DISMISSING THE WRIT PETITION FOR NON.PROSECUTION WITHOUT COSTS t dr /ff;.'*=h\ filo' ):.\ //;" '^ tii. r $ rttt ?$Il s; \Y<- t;i t\Qs=*j a