Telangana High Court

WP/14664/2026 of RENUKUNTA SANJANA Vs The State of Telangana on 6 May 2026

Cites 0, Cited by 0

HIGH COURT FOR THE STATE OF TELANGANA AT HYDERABAD (Special Original Jurisdiction) WEDNESDAY, THE SIXTH DAY OF MAY TWO THOUSAND AND TWENTY SIX PRESENT THE HONOURABLE SMT JUSTICE JUWADI SRIDEVI WRIT PETITION NO: 14664 OF 2026 Between: Renukunta Sanjana, D/o: Shiva Kumar, Aged 22 years, Occ.

13257 l

IN THE HIGH COURT FOR THE STATE OF TELANGANA

AT HYDERABAD

(Special Original Jurisdiction)

WEDNESDAY, THE SIXTH DAY OF MAY

TWO THOUSAND AND TWENTY SIX

PRESENT

THE HONOURABLE SMT JUSTICE JUWADI SRIDEVI

WRIT PETITION NO: 14664 OF 2026

Between:

Renukunta Sanjana, D/o: Shiva Kumar, Aged 22 years, Occ. Student, R/o H.No.1-15-143 to 146 Balaji Nagar Ward 15 Kagaz Nagar Adilabad District

...PETITIONER

AND

'L The State of Telangana, Rep by its Principal Secretary Higher Education Department Secretariat Buildings Hyderabad

2. The Telangana State Council for Higher Education, Opp: Mahavir Hospital Mahavir Marg Masab Tank Hyderabad Rep by its Secretary

3. The Registrar, Jawaharlal Nehru Technological University JNTUH Kukatpally Hyderabad-500 085

4. The Principal, CMR College of Pharmacy Kandlakoya Village Medchal Road Medchal-Malkajgiri District

...RESPONDENTS

Petition under Arlicle 226 of the Constitution of lndia pralng that in the circumstances stated in the affidavit filed therewith, the High Court may be pleased to issue a writ order or direction more particutarly one in the nature of writ Mandamus declaring the action of the 4th respondent in not retuming the Original Study Certificates of the petitioner inspite of 2nd respondent issuing specific directions vide LrNo TSCHE Fee Reimbursement 2024 dated 23.O2.2024 and 4th respondent issuing Circular vide CT.No.JNTUH/DAN Students /Fee ReimbursemenV2l24 dated 07.03.2024 as highly illegal arbitrary unjust and against the provisions of Education Act and against Article 14 16.49 and 21 of Constitution of lndia.

;S&*E;+i

l.A NO: 1OF 2026

Petition under Section 1 51 CPC praying that in the circumstances stated in the affidavit filed in support of the petition, the High Court may be pleased to direct the 4th respondent to forthwith return the Original SSC Marks Memo and lntermediate Marks Memo and to issue Transfer Certificate & Bonafide Certificate to the petitioner pending disposal of the writ petition.

Counsel for the Petitioner: SRI EMMADI UPENDER

Counsel for the Respondent No.1: SRI EMMADI UPENDER, AGP FOR HIGHER EDUCATION

Counsel for the Respondent No.2: SRI M. MEHBOOB ALl, SC FOR AICTE

Counsel for the Respondent No.3: SRI PRABHAKAR PERI, SC FOR JNTUH

Counsel for the Respondent No.4:---

The Court made the following: ORDER

,/'

IN THE HIGH COURT FOR THE STATE OF TELANGANA

AT HYDERABAD

THE HON'BLE SMT. JUSTICE JUWAD! SRIDEVI

WRIT PETITION No. 14664 ot 2026

DATED: O6TH MAY 2026

Between:

Renukunta Sanjana

Petitioner

AND

The State of Telangana and three others ... Respondents

Citations and Judicial Treatment

No citing decisions in the index yet

Cited by

0

Decisions in the index citing it

Cites

0

Decisions referred to

In this index

0

Of the decisions it cites

Overruled / Questioned

0

No negative treatment found

Loading the citing and cited decisions…

ORDER:

This Writ Petition is filed by the petitioner seeking the following relief: "to lssue a writ order or direction more parlicularly one in the nature of wit Mandamus declaing the action of the 4th respondent in not retuming the Oiginal Study Ceftificates of the petitioner inspite of 2nd respondent issurng specdlc directions vide LrNo TSCHE/Fee Reimbursement 2024 dated 23.02.2024 and 4th respondent issurng Circular vide C r. No. J NTU H/D ANStudents/F ee Reimbursement/2l24 dated 07-03.2024 as highly iltegal, afuitrary, uniust, and against the provisions of Edication Act and against Arlicle 14, 16, 19 and 21 of Constitution of lndia and Pass"

02. Heard Sri Emmadi Upender, learned counsel for the petitioner, Mr. K.Shgrath, learned Assistant Government Pleader for Higher Education appearing for respondent No.1

and Sri M.Mehboob Ali, learned Standing Counsel for AICTE appearing for respondent No.2 and Sri prabhakar peri, learned Standing Counsel for JNTUH Even after service of notice, none appeared on beharf of the respondent.No.4. perused the record. 03 Case of the petitioner is that the petitioner was admitted to the respondent No.4_college for B.pharmacy course. all her original certificates, including SSC Memo, lntermediate Marks Memo, Transfer Certificate & Bonafide certificate, were retained by the Management of respondent No 4-college She attended classes for about two months. Thereafter, she discontinued the studies lt is the further case of the petitioner that even after requesting the respondent No 4-college, they declined to return the above original certificates Hence, the writ petition is filed. 04 Learned counsel for the petitioner submits that the petitioner requires her original certiflcates for joining higher studies. He further submits that the action of respondent No.4 in withholding the original certificates submitted by the .try petitioner at the time of admission is illegal and arbitrary Therefore, he seeks a direction to respondent No.4 to forthwith return the petitioner's original certificates

05. lt is not in dispute that the original certificates of the petitioner referred to above were submitted before the respondent No.4 at the time of admission and the petitioner had discontinued her studies from respondent No 4-college. The said certificates, being personal and academic credentials, are undoubtedly the property of the petitioner. ln such circumstances, respondent No.4-college has no authority whatsoever to retain the said certificates and the retention of the petitioner's original certificates by respondent No.4 is wholly unjustified and cannot be sustained. Even assuming that the college has any monetary claim against the petitioner, withholding her original certificates cannot be adopted as a mode of enforcing such claim, the proper remedy, if any available to the college is to proceed in accordance with law for recovery of its dues, but not retain the petitioner's original certificates t To, TJ

06. For the foregoing discussion, this Writ petition is allowed, directing respondent No.4_college to forthwith return the original certificates of the petitioner to her. There shall be no order as to costs. Pending miscellaneous applications, if any, shall stand closed Sd/.AHMED ABDULLA KHAN ASSISTANT REGISTRAR //TRUE COPY// SECTION OFFICER

1. The Prrncipal Secretary Higher Education Department Secretariat Buildings The State of Telangana, Hyderabad

2. The Secretary, The Telangana State Council for Higher Education' Opp Mahavir Hospitat Mahavir MargMasab Tank Hyderabad'

3. The Registrar, Jawaharlal Nehru Technological University JNTUH Kukatpally Hyderabad-500 085

4. The Principal, CMR College of Pharmacy Kandlakoya Village Medchal Road Medchal-Malkalgiri District

5. One CC to Sri Emmadi Upender, Advocate [OPUCI 6'TwoCCstoGPforHigherEducation,HighCourtfortheStateofTelangana, at Hyderabad [OUT]

7. One CC to Sri M Mehboob Ali, SC for AICTETOPUCI

8. One CC to Sri Prabhakar Peri, SC for JNTUH[OPUC]

9. Two CD CoPies M, !1

HIGH COURT CC TODAY DATED: 0610512026

ORDER

WP.No.14664 of 2026 ALLOWING THE WRIT PETITION WITHOUT COSTS o 10 ili,Y 2 zo .L sitrr sre e o I : ,\,9 \] ). 'r'l/v :.:. * -\ *

\ LE 1L DrSPA-I

You have used today's free searches. Sign in, for free, to keep searching without a limit.

Compass reads the judgments for you and finds the paragraphs for and against your question. Sign in to use it.

My Vault follows judgments for you and records every later decision that cites them. Sign in to keep one.

Sign in to download the court's PDF. The full text stays free to read here.

Sign in, for free, to download the court copy. Reading the full text here stays open to everyone.

Search and read Indian judgments without limits, save them to My Vault and find the relevant paragraphs with Compass.

Open the sign-in page instead