CRP/1347/2026 of Pedapati Roja Rani Vs Sri Vuppala Arun Sindoor on 1 May 2026

IN THE HIGH COURT FOR THE STATE OF TELANGANA

AT HYDERABAD

FRIDAY, THE FIRST DAY OF MAY

TWO THOUSAND AND TWENW SIX

PRESENT

THE HONOURABLE SRI JUSTICE K.LAKSHMAN

CIVIL REVISION PETITION NO: 1347 OF 2026

t 3168 I

rder

Petitioner under Nlicle 227 of the Constitution of lndia aggrieved by the O

dated 1410312026 2026 passed in FCOP No.314 of 2023 on tire fite the ll Additional District Judge-cum-Family Court Medchal-Malkajgiri District, Kushaiguda.

of

at

BETWEEN:

Pedapati Roja Rani, Wo Vuppala Arun Sindoor And D/o p. Murali Krishna, aged 31 Years, Occ. Pvt. Employee, permanent address. H.No.5-5-7l3.1, Road No.2, Rao's High School, Devinagar, Kukatpaily, Medchat-Matkajgiri District

- 500 072, T.S.

...Revision Petitioner/Respondent

AND

Sri Vuppala Arun Sindoor, S/o Sri V. Balraj, Aged 36 years, Occ. pharmacist, R/o H.No.1-510, Prashanth Nagar Colony, OId Alwal, Alwal Mandal, Medchal-Malkajgiri District - 500010 Cett. 1(306) 3'150480 and g440939160, Email: sindoorarun@gmail.com, presenfly Residing/working at 14-102, Scotia Drive P. Roja Rou.

...RespondenUPetitioner

l.A. NO: 1 OF 2026

Fetition under Section 151 of CPC praying that in the circumstances stated in the affidavit filed in support of the petition, the High Court may be pleased to grant stay of all further proceedings in FCOP No.314t2023 on the fite of Il Addt Distiict Judga Cum Family Court, Malkajgiri District, Kushaiguda, pending disposal of the CRp ln the inlerest of justice.

Counsel for the Petitioner: Sri. G. Malla Reddy, representing Sri S.Srinivas Reddy Balakisti Counsel for the Respondent: Sri. Subramanyam Oaraboina, representing Sri. Sudarshan Malugari The Court made the following: ORDER

HIGH COURT FOR'tHE STATE OF TELANGANA

A-I'HYDE,RABAD

HON ,BLE SRI JUSTICE K. LAKSHMAN

CIVIL REVISION PETITION No.l347 OF 2026

Date: 01.05.2026

Between:

XXXXXXXXX

.. ...Revision Petitioner

AND

XXX X XXX XX

....Respondent

ORDER: (Per Hon hle Sri .lusrice K. l.uk.shnanl Heard Sri G.Matla Reddy, Iearned counsel representing Sri Slinit'as Reddy leamed counsel lor the petitioner; Sri Subramanyam Daraboina, leamed counsel representing Sri Sudarshan Malugari, leamed counsel lor the respondent; and perused the record.

2.

'fhis civil revision petition is filed under Article 227 of the Constitution of lndia assailing the order dated 14.03.2026 passed in FCOP.No.3 14 of 202f by the leamed II Additional District and Sessions Judge-cum-l Additional Metropolitan Sessions Judge-cum-ll Special Sessions Judge lor Fast Tracking the Cases relating to Atrocities against women-cum-Family Court, Medchal-Matkajgiri District, at Kushaiguda (fbr shorr,'Farnily Court')

Balakisti,

3.

The petitioner herein is the wife and the respondenr herein is the husband. The respondent-husband has filed a petition vide FCOP.No.314 of 2023 under Secrion ll(l) (ia) of Hindu Marriage Act, 1955 against the petit ioner-rv i {-c sceking dissolution ol marriagc on the ground ol cruelty. The petitione r-rvil'c has not fi led counter in the said FCOP. Therefore, she was set exj)arte on 07.04.2025.

Thereafter, she has filed I.A.No.530 of 2025 in FCOp.No.3 t4 of 2023

under Order IX Rule 7 read with Scction I 5 I ol CpC ro ser aside the said ex-parte order dated 07.04.2025, pemit her to file counter and contest the FCOP. Vide order dated 16.01.2026, rhe learncd Farnil.v Court allowed the said application scrring aside rhe ex-parte order dated 07.04.2025 on the condition ol the petitioner-wife paying costs of Rs.4,000/- ro the respondent-husband and filing counter in main case on the next date of hearing and adjourned the matter to 16.02.2026.

4. It is the specific contention of the petitioner-wifc that the petitioner could not comply with the said condition on 16.02.2026 and the matter was adjourned Lo 14.03.2026. On 14.03.2026, even rhough the petitioner was ready to comply with the order dared 16.0l.2026, the respondenf husband refused to receive the costs. Without considering the said aspects, the leamed Family Court, thus, w drsmissed I.A.No.530 ol 2025 and adjourned the matter to 10.04.?.026. Therefore, the petitioner has filed the present civil revrslon petltlon

5.

During thc course of hearing, it is brought ro the notice of the Court that the atbresaid FCOp is posted on 0g.05.2026, and the petitioner is ready with counter and ready to pay the costs.

6.

In the light ofthe aforesaid lacts and considering the lact that the disputes betrt,een the petitioner-wife and the respondent_h usband are mat.irn.nial disputes, rhis civir Revision petition is disposed or'

on the condition ttrat rhe pctitioner-wife shall flle counter on the next date o1'hearirrg i.e.,08.05.2026 in FCOp.No.3l4 ol 2023 and pay a surn of I{s.4.000/- ro rhe respondent-husband. In delault ol complying

* ith thc said conditions, this order shall stand automatically vacated.

No order as to cosls

Consequently, miscellaneous petitions, if any, pending in this appeal shall stand c losed SD/. K.BHAVANI SWAMY

AsrstsTANT REGTSTRAR

//TRUE COPY//

SECTION OFFICER

To,

1. The ll Additional District Judge-cum-Family co# u"o.n.r-lrrtalkajgiri District, at Kushaiguda

2. One CC to Sri. Srinivas Reddy Balakisti, Advocate [OpUC]

3. One CC to Sri. Sudarshan Malugari, Advocate [OpUC]

4. Two CD Copies

GNK

\

HIGH COURT

DATED: 0110512026