Telangana High Court
CRP/1338/2026 of Kanaparthi Raj Kumar Vs Kanaparthi Vandana on 1 May 2026
COURT FOR THE STATE OF TELANGANA AT HYDERABAD FRIDAY, THE FIRST DAY OF MAY TWO THOUSAND AND TWENry SIX PRESENT THE HONOURABLE SRI JUSTICE NAMAVARAPU RAJESHWAR RAO ctv L REVISION PETITION N : 1338 0F 2026 Petition under Article 227 ot the constitution of lndia, aggrieved by the order passed in
IN THE HIGH COURT FOR THE STATE OF TELANGANA
AT HYDERABAD
FRIDAY, THE FIRST DAY OF MAY
TWO THOUSAND AND TWENry SIX
PRESENT
THE HONOURABLE SRI JUSTICE NAMAVARAPU RAJESHWAR RAO
ctv L REVISION PETITION N
: 1338 0F 2026
Petition under Article 227 ot the constitution of lndia, aggrieved by the order passed in F.c.o.P No. 975 ot 2021 on the file of the court of the Additional Family Court Ranga Reddy District- At LB Nagar.
Between:
Kanaparthi Raj Kumar, S/o. Veera Brahmam, Age- 34 years, Occ_ Software Engineer, R/o. Plot No. 74, Road No.8, UtrrtT Oficers Colony, Alwal, secunderabad-sOO010. Presently residing at 1s21, continental'sphere Apartment 32, Lexington, Kentucky, U.S.A. Rep by his Special power of Aftorney, Kanaparthi Padmaja, Wo Veerabrahmam Kinaparthi, Aged about 47
years, Occ- Housewife, R/o p. No. 74, Road No.g, HMT Otriceri colony, Old Alwal, Secunderbad, Medchal pin-500010, Telangana, lndia.
...PETIT]ONER/PETITIONER
AND
Kanaparthi Vandana, Wo. Raj Kurnar,
Accountant, R/o. H.No.17-1-382/p/91,
Champapet, RangaReddy District-500079.
Age- 32
1st Floor,
Occ- Chartered
Press Colony,
years,
GoW,
...RESPONDENT/RESPONDENT
l.A. NO: 1OF 2026
Petition under section 'ls1 cpc praying that in the circumstances stated in ttre affidavit filed in support of the petition, tne High court may be pleased to direct the Additional Family court, RangaReddy Districiat L.B Nagir to mark the documents filed bv the Petitioner in F.c.o.p No. 975 of 2021 forthwih pending oispoiaf or me CRP.
Counsel for the Petitioner : Sri. p' Giri Krishna Counsel for the Respondent : Ms. Seema yasmeen The Court made the following: ORDER
rN rHE HrcH couRr l?filxisffi.E
oF TELANGANA Ar
HON'BLE SRI JUSTICE NAII{,AVARAPU RA"IESTIWAR RAO
Dated this the l"tday of May,2026
CIVIL REVISION PETITION No.1338 ot 20.26
Between:
Kanaparthi Raj Kumar
Petitioner
AND
Kanaparthi Vandana
Respondent
Citations and Judicial Treatment
Cited by
0
Decisions in the index citing it
Cites
0
Decisions referred to
In this index
0
Of the decisions it cites
Overruled / Questioned
0
No negative treatment found
Loading the citing and cited decisions…
This judgment in the centre: on the left the decisions it cites, on the right the decisions citing it. Colour is the treatment; choose a decision to open it.
ORDER:
This Civil Revision Petition is filed aggrieved by the action of the Additional Family Court, Ranga Reddy District at L.B. Nagar, in not disposing the F.C.O.P. No.975 of 2021 .
2. Heard Sri P. Giri Krishna, learned counsel for the petitioner and Ms. Seema Yasmeen, learned counsel for the respondent.
3. In the forenoon session, when the matter was taken up for hearing, learned counsel for both parties argued the matter at length. This Court, after hearing both sides, advised both counsel to seek instructions from their respective clients regarding the possibility of divorce by mutual consent, and the matter was accordingly passed over for this purpose. In the ii( "ffi#i:i i"i#,j afternoon session, when the matter is called, after getting instructions, both the counsel submitted that their clients are ready to take divorce by mutual consent and hle an application to that effect in F.C.O.P. No.975 of 2O2l pending on the file of the Additional Family Court, Ranga Reddy District, at L.B' Nagar, but with some conditions.
4. Learned counsel for the petitioner submits that the respondent/wife has to withdraw all the criminal cases and she shall not file any complaint against the petitioner/husband. He further submits that the respondent shall not claim any amount in future.
5. Learned counsel for the respondent submits that the petitioner shall delete whatever he posted in the social media and he shall not do the same in future. She further submits that the petitioner shall not claim anything from the respondent.
6. In view of tJle above submissions made by the learned counsel for the respective parties, and as the above FCOP No.975 of 2O2l is filed under Section 12(i)(a) of Hindu Marriage Act, to pass a decree declaring the marriage between the parties .iJ I
To, as null ald void, the Trial Court is directed to pass a decree of divorce by mutual consent on the application of the parties, incorporating the agreed terms and conditions. After obtaining the decree of divorce by mutual consent, both parties shall not interfere with each other,s peaceful lives and they shall not file either civil or criminal cases against each other in future. 7 . With the above direction, the Civil Revision petition is disposed of. No order a.s to costs. As a sequel, miscellaneous applications pending, if any, shall stand closed. SD/- K ASSISixilf,'Agli.YAXX //TRUE COPYII I llittJ',I;il,X, !Ug_q:y" Ransa Reddy Distnct- Al LB Nagar I *:53m; '-"3,1l;ffLl",i;'111!i3J33i' ' Ee ^oeal DUKA M.. SECTION OFFICER : ,,1 {l - ,t . +: ,' 1: I t,$. i- i .: .'; . --:: 1. ,, . i; ff$ffi$iff' ,:,t. l
HIGH COURT DATED: 0110512026
ORDER
CRP.No.1338 of 2025 DISPOSTNG OF THE CIVIL REVISION PETITION f.:ffifu'e,i .ti TTG s ( ()^ Y ll il
)) .:. I 202[
t -( ( * .r ..,s: