Telangana High Court
CRP/634/2025 of Smt. Lingamolla Manjula Vs Smt. Ausula Meena Kumari on 30 April 2026
THE HIGH COURT FOR THE STATE OF TELANGANA AT HYDERABAD THURSDAY, THE THIRTIETH DAY OF APRIL TWO THOUSAND AND TWENTY SIX PRESENT THE HONOURABLE SRIJUSTICE NAMAVARAPU RAJESHWAR RAO CIVIL REVISION PETITION NO: 634 OF 2025 Petition Under Article 227 of lhe constitution of lndia against the order
[ 33041
IN THE HIGH COURT FOR THE STATE OF TELANGANA
AT HYDERABAD
THURSDAY, THE THIRTIETH DAY OF APRIL
TWO THOUSAND AND TWENTY SIX
PRESENT
THE HONOURABLE SRIJUSTICE NAMAVARAPU RAJESHWAR RAO
CIVIL REVISION PETITION NO: 634 OF 2025
Petition Under Article 227 of lhe constitution of lndia against the order passed in O.S.No.98 ot 2022 on the file of the Court of the ll Additionat District and Sessions Judge Sanga Reddy.
Between:
Smt. Lingamolla Manjula, Wo Lingamolla Shiva Kumar Aged 24 years, occ.
House wife R/o H.No. 2-5911 Hasnabad Village, Raikode Mandal, Sanga Reddy district.
... Petitioner/Plaintiff
AND
1. Smt. Ausula Meena Kumari, Wo Julakanti Venkatesh Aged 32 years, Occ.
House hold
2. Jukanti Nagesh, Sio Jukanti Srinivas Aged 32 years, Occ. Business, R:/o plot No. 1, Sy.No.385, ODF Colony Near Master Mind School, pothoreddypally village Sanga Reddy Mandal and District
3. Batchu Anjan Kumar, S/o Batchu Eshwaraiah Aged 40 years, occ. Pvt.
Employee R/.o H.No. 3-16/1 Shankarampet R Village and Mandal Medak district.
...Respondents/Defendants
Counsel for the Petitioner : Sri. P Padma Rao Counsel for the Respondents: Ms. Nikita Goenka The Court made the following: ORDER
IN THE HIGH COURT FOR THE STATE OF TELANGANA
AT HYDERABAD
THE HON'BLE SRI .'USTICE NAMAVARAPU RAJESHWAR RAO
DATE:30.O4.2026
CIVIL REVISION PETITION No.634
F 2025
Between:
Smt. Lingamolra Manjula
... Petitioner/Plaintiff
AND
Smt. Ausula Meena Kumari and 2 others.
... Respondents/ Defendants
Citations and Judicial Treatment
Cited by
0
Decisions in the index citing it
Cites
0
Decisions referred to
In this index
0
Of the decisions it cites
Overruled / Questioned
0
No negative treatment found
Loading the citing and cited decisions…
This judgment in the centre: on the left the decisions it cites, on the right the decisions citing it. Colour is the treatment; choose a decision to open it.
ORDER
The present Civil Revision Petition is filed seeking a cjirectlon for expediiious disposal of the suit in O.S.No'98 of 2022 oending on the file of the II . Additional District and Sessicns Judge, Sangareddy.
2. Heard Mr. P. Padma Rao, learned counsel appearing for the petitioner, and Ms. Nikita Goenka, learned counsel appearing ior the respondents. Perused the material available J- on re co rd i eed
3. The suit in O.S.No.9B of 2022 was filed by the petitioner/ plaintiff directing defendant Nos.1 and 2 to cancer the sare ceed of defendant No.3 riith mutual consent and to execute a !:aie in favour of the plaintiff in respect oF the suit scherruie prcperty by receiving the balance sale consideration of Rs.60,00,000/- and if defendant fails to execute the sale deeci, Ine Ccurt may itself execute the sale deed on their- behall. oy permitting the plaintiff to deposit the balance sale consideration amount into Court for accomplishment of agreement of sale, Cated 07.07.2021. Furiher to declare the registered sale deed bearing Doc.No.10419/2021, dated 22.t2.2021 executed by the defendant Nos.1 and 2 in favour of defendant No.3 as null ar vcid and not binding on the plaintiff.
4. Learned counsel appearing for the petitioner submits that this Civil Revision petition may be disposed of by directing the trial Court to dispose of the suit in O.S.No.98 of 20J2 expeditiously, since respondents/deFendant Nos.2 and 3 have been protracting the suit without any representation. 5, Learned counsel appearing for the respondents did not cppose the said submission made by the learned counsel for the petitioner.
)
6. Having regard to the facts and circumstances of the case, vv;irc.-r.. exoressirig arl v rlpinion on the merits of the matter, this Civil Revision Petirion is dlsposed of, directing the II Additional District and Sessions Judge, Sangareddy, to dispose cf O.S.No.9B of 2022 as expeditiously as possible, ln accorCance with law. There shall be no order as to costs. A: a sequel, nriscellaneous applications pending, if any, :n this Clvi! ReVision Pert[ioi.t, shali stand closed. //TRUE COPY//
1. The ll Additional District and Sessions Judge Sanga Reddy
2. One CC to SRl. P PADMA RAO, Advocate [OPUC]
3. One CC to Ms NIKITA GOENKA, Advocate [OPUC]
4. Two CD Copies K SD/- N SRIHARI, DEPUTY REGISTRAR (e SECTION OFFICER To, i. ..,-.
HIGH COURT DATED: 3010412026
ORDER
CRP.No.634 of 2025 DISPOSING OF THE CRP WITHOUTCOSTS aa\ ,, i',. -;'|t ,.\ I .: I it', : ol 0 Lt