Telangana High Court
CRP/4084/2025 of Sri. Myadari Nomula Ramakrishna Vs Myadari Nomula Susheela on 28 April 2026
THE HIGH COURT FOR THE STATE OF TELANGANA AT HYDERABAD TUESDAY, THE TWENW EIGHTH DAY OF APRIL TWO THOUSAND AND TWENW SIX PRESENT THE HONOURABLE SRIJUSTICE NAMAVARAPU RAJESHWAR RAO CIVIL REVISION PETITION NO: 4084 OF 2025 Petition under Nlicle 227 of Constitution of lndia aggrieved by the order
[ 33041
IN THE HIGH COURT FOR THE STATE OF TELANGANA
AT HYDERABAD
TUESDAY, THE TWENW EIGHTH DAY OF APRIL
TWO THOUSAND AND TWENW SIX
PRESENT
THE HONOURABLE SRIJUSTICE NAMAVARAPU RAJESHWAR RAO
CIVIL REVISION PETITION NO: 4084 OF 2025
Petition under Nlicle 227 of Constitution of lndia aggrieved by the order dated 22-10-2025 passed in l.A.No.39 of 2025 in A.S.No.4 ol 2021 on the file of the Court of the Ist Additional District and Sessions Judge At Medak.
Between:
Sri. Myadari Nomula Ramakrishna, S/o. Venkaiah, Aged: 52 years, Occ Agriculture, Ri./o. H-No.3-1-421A, Arabgally, Medak Town and District Telangana
...Petitioner/Petitioner/Appellant
AND
1. Myadari Nomula Susheela, W/o. Anjaneyulu, Aged 46 years, Occ: Housewife, F/o. H.No.3-14211,Arabgally, Medak Town & District Telangana.
2. Allu Navas Reddy, S/o. Ranga Reddy, Aged 53 years, Occ: Agriculture, Ri./o.H.No.7-1 -282lcl 1 I 45, Balakampet, Lingaiah Nagar, Hyderabad.
3. Myadari Nomula Siripuran Mallawa, Wo. Mallaiah, Aged 60 years, Occ:
Housewife Rl/o. H.No.3-'l -43, Arabgally, Medak Town & District, Telangana
4. Myadari Shakunthala, Wo. Yadaiah, Aged: 33 years, Occ: Housewife, Fl/o.
Narsapur Village & Mandal, Medak District, Telangana.
5. Mydari Venkata Lakshmi, Wo. Yadaiah, D/o.Nomula Anjaneyulu, Aged 29
years, Occ: Housewife, Rl/o.Rudraram Village, Pantancheru Mandal, Medak District.
6. Myadari Nomula Vishnu, S/o.Anjaneyulu, Aged 25 years, Occ: Home Guard, Fi/o.H.No.3-'l-421 1, Arabgally, Medak Town & District, Telangana.
7. Myadari Nomula Sravanthi, D/o. Anjaneyulu, Aged 23 years, Occ: Private Employee, R/ o. H No.3-1 -4211 ,Arabgally, Medak Town & District Telangana.
B. Mydari Savithri, Wo.Late Narsaiah, Aced 55 years, Occ: Housewife, Rf o.H.No.1-68, Shathamari Village Shamshabad Mandal, Ranga Reddy District.
9. Myadari Pochawa, Wo. Pochaiah, Aged 42 years, Occ: Housewife Fi/o.H.No.4-36, Nagireddypeta Village & Mandal Nizamabad District, Telangana.
,.-*".-7
10. tMyadari Radha, W/o. Srishailam, Aged 38 years, Occ: Housewife, Shathamari Village Shamshabad Mandal, Ranga Reddy District.
ll.Ramannagari Ramchandra Reddy, S/o. Gopal Reddy, Occ: Business, Rl/o.H.No.3-91, Chinnaghapur Village, Kulcharam Mandal, Medak District, Presently residing. R/o.F.No.502, 5th Floor, Mypi Green Casties, Opp to GVK
EMRI, Gundlapochampally Village, Medak District.
... Respondents/Respondents/
Defendants
12. The Mandal Tahsildar, Medak lVlandal, Medak District, Telangana.
1 3. The Revenue Divisional Officer, Medak Division, Medak District, Telangana
14.The District Collector, Medak District, Telangana.
.. Respondents/Proposed Respondents
l.A. NO: 1 OF 2025
Petition under Section '1 51 CPC praying that in the circumstances stated in the affidavit filed in support of the petition, the High Court may be pleased To grant stay of all further proceedings in A.S.No.4/2021 on the file of The Court of the I Additionat Diskict and Sessions Judge At Medak.
Counsel for the Petitioners : Sri G Sindhu Counsel for the Respondent No. 11 : Sri Chidagam Srinivas The Court made the following: ORDER
w
\
IN THE HIGH COURT FOR THE STATE OF TELANGANA AT
HYDERABAD
THE HON,BLE SRI JUSTICE NAMAVARAPU RAJESHWAR RAO
Dated 28.o4.2026
C.R.P.No.4O84 ol2o25
Between:
Sri Myadari Nomula Ramakrishna.
.. Petitioner
AND
Sri Myadari Nomula Susheela and others.
.. ResPondents
Citations and Judicial Treatment
Cited by
0
Decisions in the index citing it
Cites
0
Decisions referred to
In this index
0
Of the decisions it cites
Overruled / Questioned
0
No negative treatment found
Loading the citing and cited decisions…
This judgment in the centre: on the left the decisions it cites, on the right the decisions citing it. Colour is the treatment; choose a decision to open it.
ORDER:
The present Civil Revision Petition is tiled challenging the docket order dated 22.10.2025 passed in I.A.No.39 of 2025 in A.S.No.4 of 2O2l on the frle of the I Additional District and Sessions Judge, Medak. Both the counsel are Present. Learned counsel appearing for the lltn respondent filed an affidavit on 24.O4.2026 giving an undertaking that the 1lth respondent would not alienate, create any third party interest and he would not change the nature of the \
subject propert\ in A.S.No.4 of 2021, pending disposal of A.S.No.4 of 2021 By placing the above undertaking on record, the Civil Revision Petition is disposed of. No order as to costs. Pending m iscellaneous petitions, if any, shall stand closed. SD/.K.BHAVANI SWAMY ASS TANT REGISTRAR //TRUE COPY// The I Additional District and Sessions Judge At Medq[ The Mandal Tahsildar, Medak Mandal, Medak District, Telangana' The Revenue Divisional officer, Medak Division, Medak District, Telangana The District Collector, Medak District, Telangana' One CC to Sri G Sindhu, Advocate [OPUC] One CC to Sri Chidagam Srinivas' Advocate IOPUC] Two CD Copies ECTION OFFICER To, SA
t)
vt ,f+?
HIGH COURT DATED: 2810412026
ORDER
CRP.No.4084 of 2O25 DTSPOSING OF THE CRP WITHOUT COSTS .edQL n Xx,o THE S 7,7 t C, 0 5 fltY ?t2i >- r'-.r r-'-