ARBAPPL/199/2025 of M/s. Aditya Offset Process (I) Pvt. Ltd Vs M/s. Vivid Learning Private Limited on 24 April 2026

[ 31681

IN THE HIGH COURT FOR THE STATE OF TELANGANA

AT HYDERABAD

FRIDAY, THE TWENry FOURTH DAY OF APRIL

TWO THOUSAND AND TWENTY SIX

PRESENT

THE HONOURABLE SRI JUSTICE K.LAKSHMAN

ARBITRATION APPLICATION NO: 199 OF 202s

Between:

AND

M/s. Aditya Offset Process (l) P\4. Ltd, having its registered office at D. No. 3-117, Sy. No. 56/1 , Jalpally Village, Saroor Nagar Mandal, Hyderabad, Telangana-

501510. Represented by its Director, Mr. Kamlesh Kumar Vijayvargiya

...Applicant

1. M/s. Vivid Learning Private Limited, Having its registered office at D. No.

11-13-274, Alkapuri Colony, R.K. Puram, Ranga Reddy District, Hyderabad, Telangana - 500035.

2. Mrs. Sripathi Sruthi Reddy, Aged about. 36 years, Occ. Business, Rl/o. H. No- 2-2-452, Road No. Sub-2, New Nogole Colony, L. B. Nagar, Saroor Nagar, K.V.

Ranga Reddy, Telangana - 500035.

3. Mrs. Ravula Soundarya Bhargavi, Aged about.32 years, Occ. Business, Fi/o. H- No. 4-47-1212, Flat No. C2, 3rd Floor, Shaili Enclave, Lawsons Bay Colony, OppositeWon Wodd High School, Visakhapatnam, Andhra Pradesh - 530017.

4. Mr. Rajshekar Vanka, Aged about. Not Known, Occ. Business, Rl/o. H. No.

Vaishnavi Complex, 3rd floor, Near Dominos Pizza, Moosarambagh, Hyderabad, Telangana- 502103.

5. Mr. Chepayala Sandeep Rao, Aged about. 37 years, Occ. Business, Rl/o. H.No.

Plot No. 104, Shiva Sai Hari Priya Residency, Bharath Nagar, Siddipet, Medak District, Telangana-5021 03.

6. Mr. Veeramaneni Ajay Kumar, Aged about. 48 years, Occ. Business, Rl/o. H. No.

2-12-40, Vayuputra Colony, Bheemaram, Bheemaram (Rural), Warangal District, Telangana -506015.

...Respondents

Arbitration Application under section 1 1(5) & (6) of the Arbitration and conciliation Act, 1996 R,4V scheme for Appointment of Arbitrators, 1996 praying that the Hon'ble Court may be pleased to appoint 1 . To a Sole Arbitrator on reasonable fees to resolve the disputes between the Applicant and the Respondents in relation to the Memorandum of Understanding dated 09-06-2024

2. To award costs of the Application.

Counsel for the Applicant : Sri. Mr. purushotamlaal Counsel for the Respondent Nos. 1,4 & 5 : Sri. G. praveen Kumar The Court made the following: ORDER

IN THE HTGH COURT FOR THE STATE OF TELANGANA

At': I{yDERABAt)

HON'BLE SRIJUSTICE K. LAKSHMAN

ARBTTRATION r\PPLICATION No. 199 OF 2025

l)ate:2 4-04-2026

1,

Between:

M/s Adirya Offset (t) pvt.Ltd

And

Mis Vivid Leamed pvt.Ltd. and others

This Court passed rhe follou iug:_

OITDER

...Applicant

Respondent

Heard Sri Mr. ptrrushotarn laal, learned counsel for the applicant.

When the matter was taken up for hearing on 13.03 -2026, there was no representation on behalf of respondent. T.herefbre, we have adjourned the mater to 17.04.2026 for filing counrer finally. Even then, there is no representation on behalfofthe respondent and even counter is not filed.

2. The presenr Arbitrarion Application is filed under Section I I (5)

and (6) of the Arbitrarion and Conciliation Act, 1996 (hereinafter .the Ac' 1996') for appointment of Arbitrator to adjudicate the disputes between the parties.

3. Pemsal of the rccord u,ould reveal that the applicant and [,t respondent have entercd into memorandum Of Understanding (MOU)

dated 09.06.2024 for rhe purpose of providing prinl.ing and binding services by the applicant herein on the specific terms and conditions mentioned therein.

4. According to thc applicant, therc are disputes between the applicant and l " respondcnt with regard to the agreed terms of the said MOU. Therefore, the applicant invoked clause 15 of the MOU dated 09.06.2024 which is exrracled bclow:-

I5. DISPUTES & I)tFIrIRENCIS:-

Any clarificatiorrs or dillerences raisetl between the parties, both the parties have Jiberty to serve a noticc in writing or by e_mail or post to the addresscs as statcd abovc arrd tlte other paity has to reply/resolve the issue raised on arnicable basis rvithin a period ol30

days."

As per the saicl clause, the applicant had issued notice dated 19.06.2025 nominating Mr.. A. Venkatesh Deshpande, Advocate, as an Arbitrator to adjudicate the disputes berween the appticant and lsr respondent. On receipt of the samc, l't respondent has issued reply dated d

26.06.2025 rejecting the said proposal. Therefore, the applicant filed the present application seeking appointment of Arbitrator.

5. The aforesaid facts would reveal that there are disputes between the applicani and the respondents with regard to the execution of the Memorandum Of Understanding (MOU) dated 09.06.2024. The same are arbitrable in nature and to be adjudicatcd by an Arbitrator.

6. In the light of the aforesaid discussion, the present Arbitration Application is allowed. Accordingly, Sri T.Raghuram, Retired District Judge, Flat No.402, 4'r' Floor, Kishan Residency, Shyamlal Buildings, Begumpet, Hydcrabad, Mobile No.9704377419, is appointed as sole Arbitrator to adjudicate the disputes between the parties. The parties are at liberty to take all the available pleas and defences before the leamed sole Arbitrator.

Consequently, miscellaneous Petitions, pending if any, in this Arbitration Application, shall stand closed.

Sd/- R. KARTHIKEYAN

JOINT REGISTRAR

//TRUE COPY//

1. Sri T. Rahguram, Retired District Judge, Flat No.

Residency, Shyamlal Buildings, Begumpet, Hyderabad, (By Special Messenger) (Along with a Copy of affida

2. One CC to Sri. Mr. Purushotamlaal, Advocate [OPUC]

3. One CC to Sri. G. Praveen Kumar, Advocate [OPUCI

4. Two CD Copies

SECTION OFFICER

4o2, 4t' Floor, Kishan

Mobile No. 9704377419.

vit and material paPers)

To,

i

t

i

i

i

N

HIGH COURT

DATED: 2410412026

S

t/l

I5HAY

HE

?.^

/t'o-\

i.i

;,(.J

j',J

(