Telangana High Court

CRP/4018/2025 of Smt. Bathina Vanaswi Vs Sri. Dandabathula Rambabu on 20 April 2026

Cites 0, Cited by 0

THE HIGH COURT FOR THE STATE OF TELANGANA AT HYOERABAD MONDAY, THE TWENTIETH DAY OF APRIL TWO THOUSAND AND TWENTY SIX PRESENT THE HONOURABLE SRI JUSTICE NAMAVARAPU RAJESHWAR RAO OF Petition under Nlicle 227 of the constitution of lndia aggrieved by the Order dated 28-10-2025 Passed in l.A.No.1

t 3304I

IN THE HIGH COURT FOR THE STATE OF TELANGANA

AT HYOERABAD

MONDAY, THE TWENTIETH DAY OF APRIL

TWO THOUSAND AND TWENTY SIX

PRESENT

THE HONOURABLE SRI JUSTICE NAMAVARAPU RAJESHWAR RAO

OF

Petition under Nlicle 227 of the constitution of lndia aggrieved by the Order dated 28-10-2025 Passed in l.A.No.1 ot 2025 in O.S.No.63 ot 2022 on the file of the Court of the Principal Senior Civil Judge, Bhadradri Kothagudem District, at Kothagudem.

Smt. Bathina Vanaswi, D/o. Sri.Parthasarathi, Aged about 31 years, Occ. House wife, R/o. Aswaraopeta village, and mandal, Bhadradri Kothagudem District

..PetitionerlPetitioner/Plai ntiff

EIITI.)

1. Sri. Dandabathula Rambabu, S/o. Durgaiah, Aged about 45 years, Occ.

Agriculture, Rl/o. Aswaraopeta village, and mandal, Bhadradri Kothagudem District.

2. Dandabathula Venkata Krishna, S/o. Pullaiah, Aged about 35 years, Occ.

Agriculture, Rl/o.Aswaraopeta village, and mandal, Bhadradri Kothagudem District.

3. Dandabathula Venkata Narsaiah, S/o. Pullaiah, Aged about 66 years, Occ.

Agriculture, R/o.Aswaraopeta village, and mandal, Bhadradri Kothagudem District.

4. Dandabathula Nageswara Rao, S/o. Pullaiah, Aged about 60 years, Occ.

Agriculture, FUo.Aswaraopeta village, and mandal, Bhadradri Kothagudem District.

5. Dandabathula Satyanarayana, S/o. Pullaiah, Aged about 58 years, Occ.

Agriculture, R/o. Aswaraopeta village, and mandal, Bhadradri Kothagudem District.

6. Dandabathula Padma, Wo. Pullaiah, Aged about 45 years, Occ. House wife, FUo. Aswaraopeta village, and mandal, Bhadradri Kothagudem District.

:

;l

l_I

..Respondents/Respondents/ Defendant Nos. I to 6

7. Sub-Registrar, Sathupally, 0/o. Sub Registrar, Sathupally.

8. District Registrar, Khammam 0/0. District Registrar, Khammam.

(Note. R'espondent No.7 and 8 in the present CRP is not necessary party and arc only Pro-Forma parties)

...RespondenURespondenUDefendant NOs.7 & 8

l.A. NO: 1 OF 2025

Petition under Section 151 of CPC praying that in the circumstances stated in the affidavit filed in support of the petition, the High Court may be pleased to Stay all further proceerdings in O.S.No.63 of 2022 on the file of the Principal Senior Civil Judge, at Kotl'ragudem.

Counsel for the Petitioner : Sri J Sai Vamshi representing Smt. Shailaia R

Counsel for the Respondent No 2 : Sri M V Hanumantha Rao The Court rride the following: ORDER

IN THE HIGH COURT FOR THE STATE OF TE

AT HYDERABAD

THE HON'BLE SRI JUSTICE NAMAVARAPU RAJESHWAR RAO

DATE: 2(J.o,4.2026

Between:

Smt. Bathina Vanaswi

... Petitioner/ Petitioner/ Plai ntiff

AND

Sri Dandabathula Rambabu and others.

...Respondents/Respondents/Defendant Nos.1 to 6

Citations and Judicial Treatment

No citing decisions in the index yet

Cited by

0

Decisions in the index citing it

Cites

0

Decisions referred to

In this index

0

Of the decisions it cites

Overruled / Questioned

0

No negative treatment found

Loading the citing and cited decisions…

ORDER

Sri l. Sai Vamshi, learned counsel representing Smt. Shailaja R., learned counsel for the petitioner, submits that the respondents have come forward to settle the matter out of Court.

2. In view of the same, learned counsel for the petitioner seeks permission of this Court to withdraw the present Civil Revision Petition.

3. Permission is accorded.

4. Accordingly, the Civil Revision Petition is dismissed as withdrawn. However, liberty is granted to the petitioner to approach afresh if the settlement does not happen or is not carried out. There shall be no order as to costs. 1' l

,l I I ! i I I I i i ti I I I I i I .t I i i As er sequel, miscellaneous applications pending, if any, in this Civil Revision Petition, shall stand closed SD'. T SRIDEVI, ASSISTANT REGISTRAR /TRUE COPY"

SECTION OFFICER To,

1. The Principal Senior Civil Judge, at Kothagudem

2. One Crl to Ms. Shailaja R, Advocate [OPUC]

3. One Cll to Sri M V Hanumantha Rao, Advocate [OPUC] , 4. Two CD Copies Wor*

HIGH COURT DATED: 20104/,2026 CRP ot 2025 r=ti LE5 APR -- -:. ,'i'-- 'l 4?Qii'

1. {.'1: ri? zo .'t. l:.-';t , .).. )f _ .1,*.t)s _ 'r..:.,r.'!1 1r-.r DISMISSINIG THE CRP AS WITHDRAWN c r^ :l o G,

You have used today's free searches. Sign in, for free, to keep searching without a limit.

Compass reads the judgments for you and finds the paragraphs for and against your question. Sign in to use it.

My Vault follows judgments for you and records every later decision that cites them. Sign in to keep one.

Sign in to download the court's PDF. The full text stays free to read here.

Sign in, for free, to download the court copy. Reading the full text here stays open to everyone.

Search and read Indian judgments without limits, save them to My Vault and find the relevant paragraphs with Compass.

Open the sign-in page instead