Telangana High Court

ARBAPPL/176/2025 of Amara Resources Ltd. Vs I- Choice Super Stores Pvt. Ltd. on 10 April 2026

Cites 0, Cited by 0

IN THE HIGH COURT FOR THE STATE OF TELANGANA AT HYDERABAD FRIDAY, THE TENTH DAY OF APRIL TWO THOUSAND AND TWENTY SIX PRESENT THE HON'BLE SRIJUSTICE K. LAKSHMAN ARBITRATION APFLICATION NO: 176 OF 2025 Between: Amara Resources Ltd., (previously known as AMR Hospitality Services Ltd. ) Having its

IN THE HIGH COURT FOR THE STATE OF TELANGANA

AT HYDERABAD

FRIDAY, THE TENTH DAY OF APRIL

TWO THOUSAND AND TWENTY SIX

PRESENT

THE HON'BLE SRIJUSTICE K. LAKSHMAN

ARBITRATION APFLICATION NO: 176 OF 2025

Between:

Amara Resources Ltd., (previously known as AMR Hospitality Services Ltd. )

Having its Regd. Office at Saikrupa, D.No.8-3-833, Plot No. 37 & 38, Phase- 1, Kamalapuri Colony, Hyderabad, Hyderabad - 500 073 Represented by its Director Mr. Burla Subbarami Reddy And also at Plot No. 88, Sarikonda Mansion, Ground Floor, Phase lll, Kamalapuri Colony, Hyderabad 500075.

.Applicant

AND

1. I-Choice Super Stores Pvt. Ltd., Having its Regd. Office at Plot No. 8, Karthik Enclave, Near Diamond Point, Sikh Village Road, Secunderabad - 500

009 and also at

Plot No. 41, Sri Malani Colony, Bowenpally, Secunderabad - 500 009

Trent Limited, Having its Regd. Office at Trent House, Plot No. C- 60, G- Block, Beside Ferrari Showroom, Bandra Kuria Complex, Bandra (East), Mumbai - 400 051 and a.lso at Bombay House, 24, Homi Mody Street, Nlumbai - 400001

Smt. Dasari Aruna Kumari, Wo. Late Sri. D. Lakshmana Rao, H.No.32-26- 5/5A, Eluru Road, Machavaram Down, V'rjayawada,- 520 004.

Smt. Avanthi Gutta, Wo. Sri. Dasam Sandeep, H.No.32-26-5l15, Behind Super Bazar, Eluru Road, Machavaram Down, Vijayawada, - 520 004.

Gutta Durga Prasad Rao, S/o. Late Sitaramanaiah, H.No.32-26-5l15, Behind Super Bazar, Eluru Road, Machavaram Down, Vijayawada, - 520 004.

Smt. Gutta Vijayalakshmi, Wo. Gutta Durga Prasada Rao, H. No. 32- 26- 5/15, Behind Super Bazar, Eluru Road, Machavaram Down, V'rjayawada, - 520 004

...Respondents

(Respondents 3 to 6 are not necessary parties)

Arbitration Application under Section 11(5) and (6) of the Arbitration &

Conciliation Act, 1996 R/w Scheme for Appointment of Arbitrator, 1996 praying that this Hon'ble Court may be pleased :

.

i)

To appoint an Arbitrator as per clause 14 of the lease deed dated 24.

05.2013 to adjudicate the aforesaid claims and disputes between the

2.

3.

4.

5.

6.

i:,,i

t

ii)

Applicant and the Respondents 1 & 2 as this Hon'ble Court may deem fit and To award costs of this application Gounsel for the' Applicant: Sri K. Mamatha Chowdary Counsel for the Respondent No.1: Ms. G. Rithika Reddy, counsel representing Sri Tarun G. Reddy Counsel for the Respondent No.2: Sri Sairam, counsel representing Sri P. Vamshi Krishna The Court madrr the following: ORDER

i\

IN THE HIGH COURT FOR THE STA,TE OF'TELANGANA

AT: HYDERABAD

HON'BLE SRI JUSTICE K. LAKSHMAN

ARBITRATION APPLICATION No. 176 OF 2025

Date:I0-04-2026

Between:

Amara Resources Limited

Represented by its Director

Mr. Burla Subbarami Reddy

...Applicant

And

I-Choice Super Stores Pvt.Ltd.

and others

Respondents

This Court passed the following:-

Citations and Judicial Treatment

No citing decisions in the index yet

Cited by

0

Decisions in the index citing it

Cites

0

Decisions referred to

In this index

0

Of the decisions it cites

Overruled / Questioned

0

No negative treatment found

Loading the citing and cited decisions…

ORDER

Heard Ms. K.Mamatha Chowdary, learned counsel for the Applicant, Ms. G Rithika Reddy, leamed counsel representing Sri Tarun G.Reddy, learned counsel for the 1" respondent and Sri Sairam, learned counsel, representing Sri P.Vamshi Krishna, learned counsel appearing for respondent No.2. lt is submitted by the learned counsel for the Applicant that respondent Nos.3 to 6 are not necessary parties and the said fact is also mentloned in the cause title of the Arbitration Application. \ \ tr

I

3. Itrls. G Rithika Reddy, leamed counsel representing Sri Tarun G.Reddy, learned counsel for the l" respondent and Sri sairam Kanakarne,dala, learned counsel, representing sri. p.vamshi Krishna, leamed ccruflS€l appearing for respondent No.2 reports no objection in allowing the present application.

4. f'he Applicant and the respondents have entered into a lease deed date<l 24.05.2023 at vijayawada on specific terms and conditions mentioned therein. According to the applicant, there are disputes between the Applicant and the respondents I and 2 with regard to the said lease deed. Therefore, invoking clause 14 of the said lease deed, the Applicant has issued notice dated 08.10.2024 to the respondent Nos.l and, 2. Despite receiving and acknowledging the notice, there is no response from the respondent Nos. I and 2. Therefore, it has filed the present application.

5. During the course of hearing, it is brought to the notice'of this court that in similar circumstances, vide order dated 07.02.2024 in Arb.Appl.I{o.96 of 2023, this court appointed Sri Justice A. Rajashekar \

I I Reddy, Former Judge of this Court as an Arbitrator to adjudicate the disputes between the parties.

6. It is apt to note that Sri Justice A.Rajapekhar Reddy, Former Judge of this Court, is appointed as Lokayukta for Telangana and therefore, both the learned counsel for the Applicant and respondent Nos.l and 2 sought to appoint an arbitrator other than Sri Justice A.Rajasekhar Reddy, Former Judge of this Court.

7. As discussed supra, there are disputes between the Applicant and respondent Nos. I and 2 with regard to the aforesaid lease deed dated 24.05.2013. The same are arbitrable in nature. The respondent Nos.l and 2 reports no objection in appointing fresh Arbitrator.

8. tn the light of the aforesaid discussion, the present Arbitration Application is allowed. Accordingly, Sri Justice Vilas V.Afzulpurkar Former Judge, High Court of Judicature at Hyderabad for the State l,ti li \ \ Nos.9440621404,9848025630, Flat No.401 & 402, Ruby, Lumbini Rockdale Apts., Beside Eenadu Office, Somajiguda, Hyderabad - 82, is appointed as sole Arbitrator to adjudicate the disputes between the of Telangana and for the State of Andhra Pradesh, Mobile parties. The parties are at liberty to take all the available pleas and defences before the learned sole Arbitrator consequently, miscella*eous petitions,. pehding if ffiy, in this Arbitration Application, shall stand closed. //TRUE COPY// Sd/. K. SHYLESHI JOINT REGISTRAR

To, SECTION OFFICER

1. Sri Justir:e Vilas V.Afzulpurkar, Former Judge, High Court of Judicature at Hyderab;ad for the State of Telangana and for the Stat+e of Andhra Pradesh, --Mobile 11os.9440621404, 984802s630, Frat No.401 & 402, Ruby, Lumbini Rockdale Apts., Beside Eenadu office, Somajiguda, Hyderabad-g2. (By Special Messenger)(Along with a Copy of affidavit and material papers)

2. One CC to Sri K. Mamatha Chowdary, Advocate [OpUC]

3. One CC to SriTarun G. Reddy, Advocate tOpUCI

4. One CC to Sri P. Vamshi Krishna, Advocate tOpUCl

5. Two CD Copies KAM W

,/ t HIGH COI'IRT DATEDT 1010412026

ORDER

ARBAPPI-.No .17 6 of 2025 ALLOWING THE ARBITRATION APPLICATION oo -iui: C 2 B APfl 2026 z_ .1" * t^" ( ,i)-..

You have used today's free searches. Sign in, for free, to keep searching without a limit.

Compass reads the judgments for you and finds the paragraphs for and against your question. Sign in to use it.

My Vault follows judgments for you and records every later decision that cites them. Sign in to keep one.

Sign in to download the court's PDF. The full text stays free to read here.

Sign in, for free, to download the court copy. Reading the full text here stays open to everyone.

Search and read Indian judgments without limits, save them to My Vault and find the relevant paragraphs with Compass.

Open the sign-in page instead