Telangana High Court
ARBAPPL/172/2025 of Maddi Laxma Reddy, Vs M/s. Senapathi, on 10 April 2026
IN THE HIGH COURT FOR THE STATE OF TELANGANA AT HYDERABAD FRIDAY, THE TENTH DAY OF APRIL TWO THOUSAND AND TWENTY SIX PRESENT THE HONOUR^ABLE SRI JUSTICE K.LAKSHMAN ARBITRATION APPLICATION NO: 172 OF 2025 Between 1. Maddi Laxma Reddy, S/o. Maddi Janga Reddy, aged about 58 years, Occ: Business,
[ 3168 I
IN THE HIGH COURT FOR THE STATE OF TELANGANA
AT HYDERABAD
FRIDAY, THE TENTH DAY OF APRIL
TWO THOUSAND AND TWENTY SIX
PRESENT
THE HONOUR^ABLE SRI JUSTICE K.LAKSHMAN
ARBITRATION APPLICATION NO: 172 OF 2025
Between
1. Maddi Laxma Reddy, S/o. Maddi Janga Reddy, aged about 58 years, Occ: Business, Rl/o. 16-11-11N2, Flat No. 201, Gruha Tej Residency, Saleem Nagar, Amberpet, Hyderabad -500 036,
2. Maddi Surender Reddy, S/o. Maddi Janga Reddy, aged about 55 years, Occ: Business, R/o. 17-1-391N154, Saraswathi Nagar, Saidabad, Hyderabad -500 059
3. Maddi Rithika Reddy, D/o. Maddi Surender Reddy, aged about 27 years, Occ: Student, R/o. 17-1-391N154, Saraswathi Nagar, Saidabad, Hyderabad - 500 059
4. tttladdi Akshith Reddy, S/o. Maddi Laxma Reddy, aged about 27 years, Occ: Private Service, R/o. 17-1-391N154, Saraswathi Nagar, Saidabad, Hyderabad -500 059
5. Maddi Sahith Reddy, S/o. Maddi Laxma Reddy, aged about 30 years, Occ: Business, R/o. 17-1-391N154, Saraswathi Nagar, Saidabad, Hyderabad -500 059
...Applicants
AND
1. M/s. Senapathi, Represented by its Managing Partner, Sri Divaker Chitla, S/o. Late Laxman Rao, aged about 45 years, Occ: Business, R/o. Villa No.28, KGM Enclave, Hill County Road, Bachupally, Hyderabad -500 090
2. Sri Divaker Chitla, S/o. Late Laxman Rao, age_d about 45 years, Occ: Business, Managing partner of M/s. Senapathi, Rl/o. Villa No.2B, KGM
Enclave, Hill County Road, Bachupally, Hyderabad -500 090
3. Sri Saripalli Lakshmi Udaya Kurnar Reddy, S/o. S.Sathyam Reddy, aged about 42years, Occ: Business, Managing partnerof M/s. Senapathi, R/o. Plot No. 1437, Apurupa Township, Pragathi Nagar, Bachupalle, Ranga Reddy District -500 090 Also residing at Villa No.1, Venkata Sai Homes, Nizampet, opp. Water Tank, Hyderabad -500 090
4. Smt. Lakshmi Prasanna Boggarapu, D/o. Sri Saibaba Jakka, aged about 54
years, Occ: Business, Managing Partner of M/s. Senapathi, R,/o. H. No. 8-3- 3201A14, Flat No. 3A, Abhiram Nivas, Beside Saradhi Studio, Ameerpet, Hyderabad -500 016.
...Respondents
Arbitration Application filed Under Section 11 of the Arbitration and Conciliation At;t, 1996, read with scheme for Appointment of Arbitrators, 2002, praying that in the circumstances stated in accompanying affidavit this Court may be pleased to ;appoint an arbitrator on behalf of the Applicants and Respondents as per clause No.16 of the Development Agreement-cum-General Power of Attorney dated 2911212021, as inspite of issuance of the legal notice dated 1610612025, the Respondents had not come fonrvard for appointment of Arbitrator to settle the dispute between the Acplicants and Respondents; by allowing this application in favour of the Applicants ilnd against the Respondents with exemplary costs.
Gounsel for the Petitioners
: SRI MAHESH, REPRESENTING
SRI DIDA VIJAYA KUMAR
Counsel for the Respondent Nos. 1 & 2
Counsel for the Respondent Nos. 3 & 4
The Court macle the following
: SRIALLU MIDHUN KUMAR
Citations and Judicial Treatment
Cited by
0
Decisions in the index citing it
Cites
0
Decisions referred to
In this index
0
Of the decisions it cites
Overruled / Questioned
0
No negative treatment found
Loading the citing and cited decisions…
This judgment in the centre: on the left the decisions it cites, on the right the decisions citing it. Colour is the treatment; choose a decision to open it.
: ORDER
\ IN THE HIGH COURT FOR THE STATE OF TELANGANA AT: HYDERABAD HON'BLE SRI JUSTICE IC LAKSHMAN ON
DATE:10-04-2026 Between: Mr. Maddi Laxma Reddy & others Applicants Vs. IWs. Senapathi, rep. by its Managing Partner& others . Respondents This Court delivered the following: ORDER (ORAL): Mr. Mahesh, leamed counsel representing Mr. D. Vijaya Kumar, learned counsel for the applicants, on instructions, wourd submit that during pendency of the present application, the parties have settled the disputes out of court. Therefore, he seeks permission of this court to withdraw the present application with a liberty to file fresh application in the event of non-settlement of disputes fully. He has also made an endorsement on the bundle to that effect \ \
Grantingliberty,assought'thisArbitrationApplicationis dismisseJaswithdrawn.Inthecircumstancesofthecase,there shall be no order as to costs' A:;asequelthereto,miscellaneousapplications'ifany' pending in the Arbitration Apptication shall stand closed' Sd/. B. SATYAVATHI JOINT REGISTRAR
I / //TRUE COPY//
1. One CC to Sri Dida Vijaya Kumar, Advocate [OPUC]
2. One CC to SriAllu ttlidhun Kumar, Advocate [OPUC]
3. Two CD Copies ABIVBA SECTION OFFICER To, d"
HIGH COURT DATED: 1O104.t2026
ORDER
ARBAPPL.No.lT2 ot 2025 DISMISSING TI{E ARBAPPL AS WITHDRAWN WITHOUT COSTS tr.E $ l-r., )\ .J (J 2O APfl @$,,