Telangana High Court
WP/8618/2026 of Kasireddy Manjunath Reddy Vs The State of Telangana on 24 March 2026
HIGH COURT FOR THE STATE OF TELANGANA AT HYDERABAD (Special Original Jurisdiction) TUESDAY, THE TWENry FOURTH DAY OF MARCH TWO THOUSAND AND TWENTY SIX PRESENT THE HONOURABLE SMT JUSTICE JUWADI SRIDEVI WRIT PETITION NO: 8618 OF 2026 Between: Kasireddy Manjunath Reddy, S/o. Kasireddy
132s7 1
IN THE HIGH COURT FOR THE STATE OF TELANGANA
AT HYDERABAD
(Special Original Jurisdiction)
TUESDAY, THE TWENry FOURTH DAY OF MARCH
TWO THOUSAND AND TWENTY SIX
PRESENT
THE HONOURABLE SMT JUSTICE JUWADI SRIDEVI
WRIT PETITION NO: 8618 OF 2026
Between:
Kasireddy Manjunath Reddy, S/o. Kasireddy Shekar,.Reddy, Age 21- Years'
Occ Student, FVo. H.No.3-02, Ammakapet Village, lbrahimpatnam Mandal, Karimnagar District, Telangana.
...'ET'T'ONER
AND
1. The State of Telangana, rep. by its Principal Secretary to Government, , Medical Health and'Family Weifare Department, Dr. B. R. Ambedkar T. S.
Secretariat, Hyderabad
2. Kaloji Narayana Rao University of Health and Science, Rep. by its Registrar, warangal, warangal District.
...REspoNDENTs
Petition under Article 226 of the Constitution of lndia praying that in the circumstances stated in the affidavit filed therewith, the High Court may be pleased to issue a Writ, Order or direction more in the nature of Mandamus declaring the action of the 2nd respondent in not conducting revaluation of answer sheet of MBBS First year HUMAN ANATOMY theory papers of the petitioner as bad in law and violation of Articles 14, 19 and 21 of the constitution of lndia and the principles of nature justice and consequently direct the 2nd respondent to forth with to re-evaluate the answer sheet of MBBS first year HUMAN ANATOMY theory paper of the petitioner and permit the petitioner to verify the answer sheet of MBBS first year HUMAN ANATOMY theory paper.
lA NO: 1 OF 2026
Petition under Section 15'l CPC'praying that in the circumstances stated in the affidavit filed in support of the petition, the High Court may be pleased to issue an interim direction by directing the 2nd respondent to allow the petitioner to personally verify the answer sheet and forth with to re-evaluate the answer sheet of MBBS first year HUMAN ANATOMY pending disposal of the above Writ Petition.
Counsel for the Petitioner: SRI B.BALA"fl counsel forthe Respondent No.I: sRt R.NTRANJAN REDDY, AGp FoR
MEDICAL HEALTH & FW
counsel for the Respondent No.2: sRr T.SHARATH, sc FoR KNRUHS
The Court rnade the following: ORDER
r^)
IN THE HIGH COURT FOR THE STATE OF TELANGANA
AT HYDERABAD
THE
ON'BLE
. JUSTICE JUWADI S
DEVI
WRIT
TION No.8618 ot 2026
24 MARCH.2029
Between:
Kasireddy Manjunath ReddY
... Petitioner
AND
The State of Telangana, rep. bY its
Principal Secretary to Government,
Medical Health and Family Welfare Department, Dr. B.R.Ambedkar, T.s. secretariat, Hyderabad and another . Respondents
Citations and Judicial Treatment
Cited by
0
Decisions in the index citing it
Cites
0
Decisions referred to
In this index
0
Of the decisions it cites
Overruled / Questioned
0
No negative treatment found
Loading the citing and cited decisions…
This judgment in the centre: on the left the decisions it cites, on the right the decisions citing it. Colour is the treatment; choose a decision to open it.
:ORDER:
This writ petition is filed seeking the following relief
"to issue a Writ, Order or direction more in the nature of Mandamus declaing the action of the 2nd respondent in not conducting revaluation of answer sheet of MBBS First year HTJMAN ANATOMY theory paper of the- petitioner as bad in law and violation of Articles 14, 19 'and 21 of the Constitution of tndia and the principles of natural iustice and consequently direct the ld respondent to forthwith to revaluate the answer sheet ot UAilS first year HIJMAN ANATOMY theory paper of the petitioner and permit the petitioner to verify the answer sheef of MBBS first year HUMAN ANATOMY theory paPer and to Pass..." Heard Mr. B.Balaji, learned counsel for the petitioner, Mr. R.Niranjan Reddy, learned Assistant Government Pleader for Medical, Health and Family Welfare Department appearing for respondent No.1 and Mr. T.Sharath, Iearned Standing Counsel for
Kaloji Narayana Rao University of Health and Science appearing for respondent No.2. perused lhe record.
3. Citse of the petitioner is that despite having made adequate preparation for the examinations and being confident of his performance, he was declared unsuccessful in the MBBS First year examinations in the subject of Human Anatomy. Being aggrieved by the sald result and believing that his answer scripts were not properly evaluated, he submitted an application to respondent No.2 seeking revaluation of his answer scripts, but respondent No.2_ university informed him that revaruation was not ailowed and onry recounting is permitted. Though he had submitted an application for recounting, his result was not changed. As such, he requested for personal verification of his answer scripts, however, respondent No.2-University informed him that the same was not permitted. rt is his furtfulr case that he had submitted an application, dated 06 03.2026 to respondent No.2-University seeking revaruation of his answer scripts, but the same has not been acted upon by respondent No.2-University till date. Aggrieved, the present writ petition is filed.
4. Learned counsel for the petitioner requested this Court to direct resgrondent No.2 to revaruate the petitioner's answer scripts I
\ pertaining to the MBBS First Year theory examinations in the subject of Human Anatomy and also permit the petitioner to verify his answer script of MBBS First Year Human Anatomy personally, subject to payment of requisite fee, as per the Rules.
5. On the other hand, learned Standing Counsel appearing for respondent No.2 submits that as per the regulations of respondent No.2-University, there is no provision for revaluation of answer scripts and that only re-totalling of the marks is permissible, or in specific cases, a review of the answer scripts is permissible. He further submits that recounting of the petitioner's answer script was already done and there was "no change" in the marks. He further submits that if the petitioner is still aggrieved by the result of the recounting, he is at liberty to approach the Grievance Committee of respondent No.2-University by submitting an application in the prescribed form along with the requisite fee. However, learned Standing Gounsel reported no objection in directing respondent No.2 to re-verify the petitioner's answer script relating to the MBBS First Year Human Anatomy and in permitting the petitioner to verify his answer script of MBBS First Year Human Anabmy personally, subject to payment of the requisite fee. II \
6. ln view of the submissions made b), the tearned counsel appearingl on both sides, this court deerns it appropriate to direct respondent No.2-University to re-verify the petitioner's answer script reiating to tire MBBS First year flreory examinations in the subject of Human Anatomy forthwith anct also permit the petitioner to verify his answer script of MBBS First Year Fluman Anatomy personally, on payment of requisite fee, as per the Rules.
with the above directions, this writ petition is disposed of. There shall be no order as to costs Miscellaneous applications, if any, shall stand closed. s ASSISTANT REGISTRAR \
//TRUE COPYII To sEcTtoN oFFtcER
1. The f)rincipal Segelary to. Go.vernment, Medical Health and Family Welfare Department, Dr. B. R. Ambedkar T. s. secretin=ai, Hvi"iao"d,'iHt;;i Telangana. 2 ll:11"-glstr.ar, Karoji \gr.a.yana Rao University of Hearth and Science, _ warangal, Warangal District.
3. One CC to SRt B.BALAJI, Advocate tOpUCl
4. Two (]Cs to GP FOR MEDICAL HEALTH C'Fw, High court for the state of
- lelalggna,_at Hyderabad. IOUTI
5. One CC to SRI T.SHARATH, SCFOR KNRUHS tOpUCI
6. Two OD Copies PSK. a.
/ , CC TODAY HIGH GOURT DATED i2410312026
ORDER
WP.No.8618 of 2026 o LJ DiSPOSING OF THE WRIT PETITION WITHOUT COSTS ErL rrr.li t * ?,5 t,lAfl ilrJ:/6 e : i a I