Telangana High Court
WP/11153/2019 of G. Vinod Kumar, Vs The State of Telangana, on 23 March 2026
tN THE HIGH COURT FOR THE STATE OF TELANGANA AT HYDERABAD (Special Original Jurisdiction) MONDAY, THE TWENTY THIRD DAY OF MARCH TWO THOUSAND AND TWENTY SIX PRESENT THE HONOURABLE SRI JUSTICE SUDDALA CHALAPATHI RAO WRIT PETITION NO: 11153 OF 2019 Between: G. vinod Kumar, s/o. Late G. Pentaiah, aged
[ 3485 I
tN THE HIGH COURT FOR THE STATE OF TELANGANA
AT HYDERABAD
(Special Original Jurisdiction)
MONDAY, THE TWENTY THIRD DAY OF MARCH
TWO THOUSAND AND TWENTY SIX
PRESENT
THE HONOURABLE SRI JUSTICE SUDDALA CHALAPATHI RAO
WRIT PETITION NO: 11153 OF 2019
Between:
G. vinod Kumar, s/o. Late G. Pentaiah, aged about 50 years, occ. service, R/o. H. No. 10-2-177, Road No. 1, West Maredpally, Secunderabad.
...PETITIONER
AND
1. The state of relangana, Rep. by its Principal secretary, Assignment lll, (Revenue Department), secretariat, saifabad, Hyderabad, Telengana state.
2. The state of relangana, Rep. by its Secretary, Municipat Admn. and Urban Devp. Authority, Secretariat, Saifabad, Hyderabad.
R2 is accordingly wP dismissed in so far as per court order dated 17106/,2019.
3. The Commissioner of (Land Revenue), o/o. chief commissioner of Land administration, Opp. Annapurna Hotel, Nampally, Hyderabad - S00 001.
4. The Estate Officer, Deputy Collector, Revenue Department, Estate Office at, GHMC Building, Secunderabad.
5. The Estate officer, Revenue Department, GHMC Building, 3rd Froor, Secunderabad
6. RB Parasmal, s/o. Late BerulalJain, c/o. Ranka Jewellers, occ. Business, H.
No. 7 -2-763, Pot Market, Secunderabad.
...RESPONDENTS
Petition under Article 226 of the Constitution of lndia praytng that in the circumstances stated in the affidavit filed therewith, the High Court may be pleased to issue a Writ or order or direction more particularly one in the nature of a Writ of Mandarnus, declaring the in-action on the part of the Respondent No. 1 and 2 in not considering/disposing the petitioners Representations dt.28.03.2019 and 17-12- 2018, for,lonversion of tenancy land in io free hold (transferring of ownership rights)
in Municipal house bearing No. 10-2-177 in Road No. 1 at West Maredpaily, Sec,bad of the said property as illegal, arbitrary and consequently declare the same as violative of principles of naturaljustice and also violative of Art. 14 of the Constitution of lndia and consequently direct the Respondents No. 1 and 2 herein to consider/dispose of the petitioners representation dt. 28-03-2019 and 17-12-2018 on payment of necessary market value as directed by the Respondents herein and further direrct the respondents to pass orders on the said representations forthwith for transferrinl; ownership rights.
l.A. NO: I OF 2019
Petition under Section 151 CPC praying that in the circumstances stated in the affidavit filed in support of the petition, the High Court may be pleased to issue a interim direction directing the respondents herein not to dispossess/evict the petitioner herein the Municipal bearing H.No. 10-2-177 in Road No. 1 situated at West Mare'Cpally, Secunderabad pending disposal of the above Writ Petition.
l.A. NO: 1 OF 2026
Petition under Section 151 CPC praying that in the circumstances stated in the affidavit filed in support of the petition, the High Court may be pleased to issue a direction, clirecting the Respondents herein to consider the application of the Petitioner frrr conversion of Tenancy into Freehold rights as per the letter of the Estate Officer Lr.No.4/268, Dt: 20.10.2021 notwithstanding pendency of the Writ Petition Nos. 46374 of 2016 and 1 1 153 of 2019, pending disposal of the writ petition.
Counsel fon'the Petitioner: SMT V.UMA DEVI
Counselfor the Respondent No.l, 3, 4 & 5: GP FOR REVENUE
Counselfor the Respondent No.2: GP FOR MCPL ADMN URBAN DEV
Counset for the Respondent No.6: SRI SAROSH BASTAWALA
The Court rnade the following: ORDER
To,
I
:
I
I
I
I
I
I
t
i
t
IN THE HIGH COURT FOR THE STATE OF TELANGANA
AT HYDERABAD
THE HON'BLE SRI JUSTICE SUDDALA CHALAPATHI RAO
of
DATE: 23.O3.2O26
Between:
G. Vinod Kumar
Petitioner
AND
The State of Telangana,
Rep. by its Principal Secretary,
Assignment III (Revenue Department),
Secretariat, Saifabad, Hyderabad and 4 others
...Respondents
Citations and Judicial Treatment
Cited by
0
Decisions in the index citing it
Cites
0
Decisions referred to
In this index
0
Of the decisions it cites
Overruled / Questioned
0
No negative treatment found
Loading the citing and cited decisions…
This judgment in the centre: on the left the decisions it cites, on the right the decisions citing it. Colour is the treatment; choose a decision to open it.
ORDER:
when the matter is taken up for hearing, Smt. v.umadevi, learned counsel for the petitioner would contend that, she would intend to withdraw the present writ petition. It is further submitted that, in the event of any subsequent development, liberty may be granted to pursue subsequent developments before the appropriate forum.
2. Granting liberty as sought for, the Writ Petition is dismissed as withdrawn. There shall be no order as to costs' Miscellaneous petitions, if any are Pending, //TRUE COPY// SECTION OFFICER
1. One CC to SMT V.UMA DEVI, Advocate
2. One CC to SRI SAROSH BASTAWALA, IoPUCI
3. Two CCs to GP FOR REVENUE, High Court for the State of Telangana at Hyderabad [OUT]
4. Two GCs to GP FOR MCPL ADMN URBAN DEV, High court for the state of Telarrgana at HYderabad [OUT]
5. Two'3D CoPies BSR/PMK / ! t
HIGH COURT DATED i 2310312026 ,)o !)
ORDER
WP.No.11153 of 2019 DISMISSING THE WRIT PETITION AS WIT'HDRAWN, WITHOUT COSTS 1 5 \I[ 1$1t STATE * i * !i I \ k qrb