WP/5696/2015 of M. Yadaiah Vs State of Telangana, on 16 March 2026

1. M. Yadaiah, s/o Balaiah aged 56 years, Occ labourer r/o 1-60, Gachibowli, Hyderabad RR District

2. T. Jaihind, s/o Yellaiah aged 55 years, Occ labourer r/o 1-58, Gachibowli, Hyderabad RR District

3. G. Balraj, s/o Balaiah, aged 57 years Occ labourer r/o Gachibowli, Hyderabad RR District

4. G. Arjun, s/o Late G. Balaiah aged 37 years, Occ labourer rlo 1-28, Gachibowli, Hyderabad RR District

5. M. Laxman, s/o Hemia aged 68 years Occ labourer r/o 1-60/5, Gachibowli, Hyderabad RR District

6. J. Shiva, s/o J. Laxman aged 24 years Occ labourer rlo 1-6017. Gachibowli, Hyderabad RR District

7. M. Ravi, s/o M. Shankar Late aged 48 years Occ labourer rlo 1-1612, Gachibowli, Hyderabad RR District

8. M. Ravi Naik, s/o Late M. Shanker aged 27 years Occ labourer ilo 2-57,

9. M. Manikyam, s/o Hemia aged 65 years Occ labourer r/o Gachibowli, Hyderabad RR District

10. M. Beenila, S/o Late M. Hanumanth, aged 51 years Occ labourer o 2-57, Gachibowli, Hyderabad RR District

11. C.K. Mani, s/o C. Kondra aged 65 years Occ labourer rlo 1-2611. Gachibowli, Hyderabad RR Diskict -12.G. Praveen, s,/o late G. Ashok aged 18 years, Occ labourer rlo 1-4811' Gachibowli, HYderabad RR District

13. G. Sathynarayana, s/o late G. Balaiah aged 30 years Occ labourer tlo 1-28' Gachibowli, Hyderabad RR District

14. G. Yadaiah, s/o Maisaiah aged 58 years Occ labourer rlo 14OlA, Gachibowli' Hyderabad RR District 'l 5. G- Krishna, s/o Mysaiah aged 62 years, Occ labourer r/o Gachibowli, Hyderabad RR District

16. G. Pochaiah, s/o Nagaiah aged 66 years Occ labourer r/o 1-31' Gachibowli, Hyderabad RR District

17. D. Janardhan, s/o aged 37 years Occ labourer 7o 1 -58, Gachibowli, Hyderabad RR District

18. G. Baghiah, s/o Mysaiah aged 62 years Occ lat >urer r/o Gachibowli, Hyderabad RR District

19. Y. Narasimha, s/o Pochaiah aged 61 years Occ labour r do 1-78. Gachibowli, Hyderabad RR District

20. D. Gandaiah, s/o Babaiah aged 55 years Occ lat turer r/o Gachibowli, Hyderabad RR District

21. G. Darshan, S/o late G. Shankaraiah aged 28 ycr rs, Occ labourer r/o

22. T. Ramana Murthy, S/o Mysaiah aged 30 years O; labourer rlo 1-4011 . Gachibowli, Hyderabad RR District

23. G. Nagesh, S/o late Narasimha aged 21 years ( ), c, labourer rlo 1-28, Gachibowli, Hyderabad RR District

24. D. Sriramlu; S/o late D. Ramaswamy aged 26 years ( r(;c labourer r/o 1-58, Gachibowli, Hyderabad RR District

25. K. Goverdhan, S/o late K. Snnivas aged 27 years Or c labourer r/o 'l -60/10, Gachibowli, Hyderabad RR District

26. G. Babu Rao, S/o late G. Narimha aged 46 years l.-3 labourer rto 1-48, Gachibowli, Hyderabad RR District

27. D. Laxman, Sio late D. Anantaiah aged 34 years O rr: labourer rlo 1-41 , Gachibowli, Hyderabad RR District

28. K. Sudhakar, S/o late K. Mallaiah aged 37 years ( )r c: labourer rlo 1-82, Gachibowli, Hyderabad RR District

29. R. Ashok @ Das, S/o late R. Mallaiah aged 62 yr:; rs Occ labourer r/o Gachibowli, Hyderabad RR District 3O. K. Krishna, S/o Durgaiah aged 55 years Occ laboure, lo 1-97. Gachibowli, Hyderabad' RR District.

31.8. Yadagiri, S/o late Rajaram aged 58 years Occ lrbourer rlo 1{,0112.

32. K. Danaiah, S/o Eraiah aged 55 years Occ labourer r tr 1-34, Gachibowli, Hyderabad RR District

33. D. Narasirnha, s/o Babaiah aged 78 years Occ lab: rrer r/o Gachibowli, Hyderabad RR District

34. D- Mysaiah, S/o Laxmaiah aged 73 years Occ tabourer lo 1-Sl, Gachibowli, Hyderabad RR District

35. G. Swamy, S/o Ballingaiah aged 63 years Occ labourer t,t 'l-20, Gachibowli, Hyderabad RR District.

36. T. Mallesh, S/o T. Muthaiah aged 55 years Occ labourer /,t 1-13, Gachibowli, Hyderabad RR District

37. M. Sudhakar, S/o late Pentaiah aged 33 years Oc: labourer rto 1-26,

38. Mr.M. Sanjay S/o Late M.Laxman, Aged 51 years F/o 1 6011612 Situated at Gachibowli Srilingampally Hyderabad RR District.T.S.S0()l :i2.

39. Mr.M.Viftl Nayak S/o Late Manikyam, Aged 59 years F/ r 2-33 lndira Naqar Near bank Opp.Gachibowli Srilingampally Hyderabad RF )istrict.T.S.500052.

40. Smt.D.Shanthamma Wo Late D. Gandaiah, Aged 59 years R/o 1-5711718 Rajeev Nagar Near Pocgamma Temple Gachibowli Srilingampally Hyderabad RR District.I.S-500032. 41 Smt. Thotla Santosha Wo Late Sri Rama Murthy @ Raman Murthy, Aged 55 years Occ. House Wife Gachibowli Old Village Gachibowli Srilingampally Hyderabad RR Diskict.T.S.500032. Petitioner Nos.38,39,4O, and 41 brought on record as Lrs of the deceased Petitioner Nos. P5, P9,and P20 P22 as per the C-o dt 2510312021 in lA No.1,2,3 and 4 ot 2021. ...PETITIONERS AND 'l . State of Telangana,, rep. by its Principal Secretary, Revenue Department Secretariat, Hyderabad.

2. District Collector, Ranga Reddy District at Hyderabad., -

3. Commissioner,, Social Welfare Department State of Telangana, Hyderabad.

4. A.P. Social Welfare Residential Educational lnstitutions, Society, Hyderabad,

5. Telangana Social Welfare Residential Educational, lnstitutions Society, Hyderabad, rep. by its Secretary.

6. Andhra Pradesh Education & Welfare lnfrastructure, Development Corporation, Hyderabad, rep. by its Managing Director.

7. Telangana Scheduled Castes Coop. Development Corp. Ltd,, Hyderabad, rep. by its Vice Chairman and Managing Director

8. Deputy Collector & Tahsildar, Serilingampalti Mandal, Ranga Reddy Oistrict

9. Sri G. Janardhan Reddy, s/o G. Yella Reddy, aged major, H. No.2-311E212, Shivajinagar Colony. Taranagar, Sherilingampally, Hyderabad. 10-The Revenue Divisional OfIicer, Chevella Now Rajendranagar, R.R. District. R10 is impleaded as per C.O. dt. 231312022 inl.A. No.212022. .RESPONDENTS Petition under Article 226 of the Constitution of lndia praying that in the circumstances stated in the aflidavit filed therewith, the High Court may be pleased to issue any appropriate Writ, Order or direction preferably a Writ in the nature of Writ of Mandamus, declaring (1) the order in Proceeding. No. LC11437012O13 dt. 12.11 .2013 issued by the 2nd respondent and also consequential proceedings No. BD/3542lSCSP|2O11 dt. 10.12.2013 issued by the 4th respondent and the Letter No. D2lSE/APEWIDCHyd/Comp- Gachibowli/Hyd 12013 dt. 3.3.2014 and also (2) the high handed action of the respondents in interfering with the possession of the petitioners of their respective patta lands for which the petitioners have paid 50% of th ) ilnd value as fixed by the Government and also (3) the action of the 7th resfrc tlent in not returning their original respective patta certificates, which were l)l rrlged while receiving loans, even after clearing the loan amounts as being illepe, arbitrary, contrary to the principles of natural justice and violative of Art. 4 and 300-4 of the Constitution of lndia apart from violative of the provisio r r of the Right to Fair Compensalion and Transparency in Land Acquisiti( r Rehabilitation and Resettlement Act, 2013 and consequently set aside the , tnve proceedings by directing the 7th respondent to retum the patta certificates ,)/ directing the official respondents not to interfere with the possession of their r: pective plots situated in Gachibowli village, Serilingampally Mandal, R.R. District rnd not to dispossess the petitioners without following due process of law 4. Dirr,t t the 2nd Respondent to implement the scheme by providing /returning the ) ltadar certificates dt 05/03/'1982 to the petitioners and direct the Respor r :nt No.8 for taking appropriate action, as the Tahsildar / Respondent Nrr ) is the appropriate authority under Sections 6 and 7 of Act, 9 of 2O20. Prayer is amended as per C.O.dt.2411212021 in l.A.No.8 ci 2O21. l.A. NO: 4 OF m1S{WPMP. NO: 7588 OF 2015 Petition under Section. 151 CPC praying that in the r i cumstances stated in the affidavit filed in support of the petition, the High Co r : may be pleased to direct the respondents not to interfere with the possess ( o of the land of the petitioners each 242 sq. yards totally admeasuring Ac.3 l8 guntas situated in Gachibowli Village, Serilingampally. Ranga Reddy Districl tithout following due process of law, pending disposal of the above writ petition lA NO: 7 OF m21 Petition under Section 151 CPC praying that in the c r )rimstances stated in the affidavit filed in support of the petition, the High Cor r may be pleased to receive additional documents in the above case.

lA NO:1 OF 2022

the affidavit filed in support of the petition, the High Court may be pleased to permit the petitioners to amend, by incorporating in the prayer portion of the writ affidavit and the accompanying wrat petition, as follows:- i.e. after the words Sections 6 and 7 of Act, 9 of 2O20, 5. The Resumption Proceedings No.D/l654/86, Dt 25i06/1986 issued by the RDO, Chevella, R.R. District, including panchanama proceedings No.8/536/2013 Dt 1611112013 issued by the Respondent No.8, are null and void and 6. Directing Respondent No.2 and RDO, Chevella Division, now Raiendranagar Division, R.R. District to issue final patta certificates in favour of petitioners or their legal heirs, on deposit of the balance 50 percent of the sale consideration, already decided at the time of issuance of patta certificates in the year 1982, in respect of the subject plots of land, by the petitioners or their legal heirs/agents. lA NO:9 OF 2021

the affidavit filed in support of the petition, the High Court may be pleased to rernive additional documents in the above Case. l.A. NO: 3 OF 2015(WPMP. NO: 7587 0F 201s1 Petition under Section 151 CPC praying that in the circumstances stated in the affidavit filed in support of the petition, the High Court may be pleased to stay all further proceedings pursuant to the order in Proceeding. No. LC1/4370/2O13 dt. 12.11.2013 issued by the 2nd respondent and also consequential proceedings No. BD/3542ISCSP/2O11 dt. 10.12.2013 issued by the 4th respondent and the Letter No. D2lSE/APEWIDC-Hyd/Comp GachibowliiHydl20l3 dt. 3.3.2O14, pending disposal of the above writ petition and pass such other order ororders as may deem fit and proper in the circumstances of the case. pending disposal of the above writ petition.

l.A. NO: 1 OF 2015(t IVMP. NO: 1800 OF 201s) Between: Telangana Social Welfare Residential Educational, lnstitutiorr:

;ociety, Hyderabad, ...PETITIC t ERS/RESPONDENTS AND I

1. tV'|. Yadaiah, s/o Balaiah aged 56 years, Occ labour: r/o 1-60, Gachibowli, Hyderabad RR District

2. T. Jaihind, s/o Yellaiah aged 55 years, Occ labourr,r r/o 1-58, Gachibowli, Hyderabad RR District 3- G. Bilraj, s/o Balaiah, aged 57 years Occ labourer r/o ( ;rchibowli, Hyderabad RR District

4. G. Arjun, s/o Late G. Balaiah aged 37 years, Gachibowli, Hyderabad RR District ()( c labourer rlo 1-28,

5. M. Laxman, s/o Hemia aged 68 years Occ labourer r: -l -60/5, Gachibowli, Hyderabad RR District

6. J. Shiva, Vo J. Laxman aged 24 years Occ labourer r t 1-60ll. Gachibowli, Hyderabad RR District

7. M. Ravi, Vo M. Shankar Late aged 48 years Oc: tabourer r/o Gachibowti, Hyderabad RR District 1-16t2, M. Ravi Naik, s/o Late M. Shanker aged 27 years r) ;,; labourer rlo 2-57 , Gachibowli, Hyderabad RR District

9. M. Manikyam, Vo Hemia aged 65 years Occ Hyderabad RR District la bc rrer r/o Gachibowli,

10. M. Beemla, S/o Late M. Hanumanth, aged 5'l years l;: labourer rlo 2-51 , Gachibowli, Hyderabad RR District

11. C.K. Mani, s/o C. Kondra aged 65 years Occ labourer I t 1-2611, Gachibowli, Hyderabad RR District 12-G. Praveen, s,/o late G. Ashok aged Gachibowli, Hyderabad RR District 18 years, Ocr lirbourer rlo 148fi ,

13. G. Sathynarayana, s/o late G, Balaiah aged 30 years r):; labourer rlo 1-28, Gachibowli, Hyderabad RR District

14. Cr Yadaiah, s/o Maisaiah aged 58 years Occ labourer r < t-4OlA, Gachibowli, Hyderabad RR District

15. G. Krishna, s/o Mysaiah aged 62 years, Occ labc r r:r r/o Gachibowli, Hyderabad RR District

16. G. Pochaiah, s/o Nagaiah aged 66 years Occ labourer r cr 1 -31, Gachibowli, Hyderabad RR District

17. D. Janardhan, s/o aged 37 years Ocr labourer l: 1-58, Gachibowli, Hyderabad RR District 18-G. Baghiah, yo Uysaiat aged 62 years Occ labo I err r/o Gachibowli, Hyderabad RR District

19. Y. Narasimha, s/o Pochaiah aged 61 years Occ labourer r/o 1-78, Gachibowli, Hyderabad RR District

20. D. Gandaiah, s/o Eabaiah aged 55 years Occ labourer r/o Gachibowli, Hyderabad RR District 21 . G. Darshan, S/o late G. Shankaraiah aged 28 years, Occ labourer r/o

22. T. Ramana Murthy, S/o Mysaiah aged 30 years Occ labourer rlo 1-4011. Gachibowli, Hyderabad RR District

23. G. Nagesh, S/o late Narasimha agd 21 years Occ labourer rlo 1-28, Gachibowli, Hyderabad RR District

24. D. Sriramlu, S/o late D. Ramaswamy aged 26 years Occ labourer r/o 1-58, Gachibowli, Hyderabad RR District

25. K. Goverdhan, S/o late K. Srinivas aged 27 years Occ labourer rlo 1-60110, Gachibowli, Hyderabad RR District

26. G. Babu Rao, S/o late G. Narimha aged 46 years Occ labourer rlo 1-48, Gachibowli, Hyderabad RR District

27. D. Laxman, S/o late D. Anantaiah aged 34 years Occ labourer rlo 1-41, Gachibowli, Hyderabad RR District

28. K. Sudhakar, S/o late K. Mallaiah aged 37 years Occ labourer rlo 1-82, Gachibowli, Hyderabad RR District

29. R. Ashok @ Das, S/o late R. Mallaiah aged 62 years Occ labourer r/o Gachibowli, Hyderabad RR District 3O. K. Krishna, S/o Durgaiah aged 55 years Occ labourer rlo 1-97 . Gachibowli,

31. B. Yadagiri, S/o late Rajaram aged 58 years Occ labourer rlo 1-60112. Gachibowli, Hyderabad, RR District

32. K. Danaiah, S/o Eraiah aged 55 years Occ labourer rlo 1-34, Gachibowli, Hyderabad RR District

33. D. Narasimha, s/o Babaiah aged 78 years Occ labourer r/o Gachibow{i, Hyderabad RR District

34. D. Mysaiah, S/o Laxmaiah aged 73 years Occ labourer rlo 1-57, Gachibowli, Hyderabad RR District

35. G. Swamy, S/o Ballingaiah aged 63 years Occ labourer rlo 1-2O, Gachibowli,

36. T. Mallesh, S/o T. Muthaiah aged 55 years Occ labourer rlo 1-13, Gachibowli, ' Hyderabad RR District

37. M. Sudhakar, S/o late Pentaiah aged 33 years Occ labourer rlo 1-26, Gachibowli, Hyderabad RR District. 3B.Mr.M. Sanjay S/o Late M.Laxman, Aged 51 years R/o 1$011612 Situated at Gachibowli Srilingampally Hyderabad RR District.T.S.5OO032.

39. Mr.M.Vittl Nayak S/o Late Manikyam, Aged 59 years R./o 2-33 Indira l,lagar Near bank Opp.Gachibowli Srilingampally Hyderabad RR District.T.S.500032.

40. Smt.D.Shanthamma Wo Late D. Gandaiah, Aged 59 years R./o 1-5711718 Rajeev Nagar Near Pocgamma Temple Gachibowli Srilingampally Hyderabad RR District.T.S.5OO032.

41. Smt. Thotla Santosha W/o Late Sri Rama Murthy @ F eman Murthy, Aged 55 years Occ. House Wife Gachibowli Old Village G a ;hibowli Srilingampally Hyderabad RR District.T.S.500032. Petitioner Nos.38,39,40, and 41 brought on re:ord as Lrs of the deceased Petitioner Nos. P5, P9,and PzO P2l rs per the C-o dt 2510312021 in lA No.1,2,3 and 4 ol 2021. ... RESPC I DENTS/ PETITIONER

42. State of Telangana,, rep. by its Principal Secretary, Rr ), enue Department Secretariat, Hyderabad.

43. District Collector, Ranga Reddy District at Hyderabad.

44. Commissioner,, Social Wetfare Department State of T: lngana, Hyderabad.

45. A.P. Social Welfare Residential Educational lnstitution; liociety, Hyderabad,

46. Andhra Pradesh Education & Wetfare lnfrastructure, D€ /,)lopment Corporation, Hyderabad, rep. by its Managing Director 4T.Telangana Scheduled Castes Coop, Development Corp -td,, Hyderabad, rep. by its Vice Chairman and Managing Director

48. Deputy Collector & Tahsildar, Serilingampalli Mandal, rl rnga Reddy District

49. Sri G. Janardhan Reddy, 9o G. Yella Reddy, aged mar-, H. No.2-311E212, Shivajinagar Colony, Taranagar, Sherilingampally, Hyde'zrbad.

50. The Revenue Divisional Oflicer, Chevella Now Rajendrz ragar, R.R. District. R10 is impleaded as per C.O. dt. 231312022 in l.A. No 2112022. ...RESPONDE I TS/RESPONDENTS Petition under Section 1.5'l CPC praying that in the c r :umstances stated in the affidavit filed in support of the petition, the Hrgh Cor r may be pleased to vacate the interim order dated 20.03.2015 in WPMP No;587 of 2015 in WP No.5696 ol 2O15. l.A. NO: 2 OF 201sftlruMP. NO: 3370 OF 20151 Between: 1 . District Collector, Ranga Reddy District at Hyderabad.,

2. Telangana Schedubd Castes Coop. Development CorE. -td,, Hyderabad,

AND

...PETITION E T S/RESPONDENTS M, Yadaiah, s/o Balaiah aged 56 years, Occ labourer tr 1-60, Gachibowli, Hyderabad RR District

2. T. Jaihind, s/o Yellaiah aged 55 years, Occ labourer rlo 1-58, Gachibowli, Hyderabad RR District

3. G. Balraj, s/o Balaiah, aged 57 years Occ labourer r/o Gachibowli, Hyderabad RR District

4. G. Arjun, s/o Late G. Balaiah aged 37 years, Occ labourer rlo 1-28, Gachibowli, Hyderabad RR District

5. M. Laxman, Vo Hemia aged 68 years Occ labourer rlo 1-6015, Gachibowli, Hyderabad RR District

6. J. Shiva, s/o J. Laxman aged 24 years Occ labourer rlo 1'6O17. Gachibowli, Hyderabad RR District

7. M. Ravi, s/o M. Shankar Late aged 48 years Occ labourer rlo 1-1612, Gachibowli, Hyderabad RR District

8. M. Ravi Naik, s/o Late M. Shanker aged 27 years Occ labourer tlo 2-57, Gachibowli, Hyderabad RR District

9. M. Manikyam, s/o Hernia aged 65 years Occ labourer r/o Gachibowli, Hyderabad RR District .1O.M. Beemla, S/o Late M. Hanumanth, aged 51 years Occ labourer tlo 2-57, Gachibowli, Hyderabad RR District 1 1-C.K. Mani, s/o C. Kondra aged 65 years Occ labourer rlo 1'2611 , Gachibowli, Hyderabad RR District

12. G. Praveen, s/o late G. Ashok aged 18 years, Occ labourer rlo 1-4811, Gachibowli, Hyderabad RR District

13. G. Sathynarayana, s/o late G. Balaiah aged 30 years Occ labourer ilo 1-28, Gachibowli, Hyderabad RR District

14. G. Yadaiah, s,/o Maisaiah aged 58 years Occ labourer rlo 1-4OlA, Gachibowli, Hyderabad RR District '15- G. Krishna, s/o Mysaiah aged 62 years, Occ labourer r/o Gachibowli, Hyderabad RR District

16. G. Pochaiah, s/o Nagaiah aged 66 years Occ labourer rlo 1-31, Gachibowli, Hyderabad RR District 1 7. D. Janardhan, s;/o aged 37 years Occ labourer rlo 1-58, Gachibowli, Hyderabad RR District 'l B. G. Baghiah, s/o Mysaiah aged 62 years Occ labourer r/o Gachibowli, Hyderabad RR District '19.Y. Narasimha, s/o Pochaiah aged 61 years Occ labourer rlo 1-78, Gachibowli, Hyderabad RR District

20. D. Gandaiah, s/o Babaiah aged 55 years Occ labourer r/o Gachibowli, Hyderabad RR District 21 . G. Darshan, S/o late G. Shankaraiah aged 28 years, Occ labourer r/o

22. f . Ramana Murthy, S/o Mysaiah aged 30 years Occ labourer do 1-4011. Gachibowli, Hyderabad RR District

23. G. Nagesh, S/o late Narasimha aged 21 years Occ labourer rlo 1-28, Gachibowli, Hyderabad RR District

24. D. Sriramlu, S/o late D. Ramaswamy aged 26 years Occ labourer r/o 1-58' Gachibowli, HYderabad RR District

25. K. Goverdhan, S/o late K. Srinivas aged 27 years () c labourer r/o 1-60/10, Gachibowli, Hyderabad RR District

26. G. Babu Rao, S/o late G. Narimha aged 46 years Jcc labourer rlo 1-48, Gachibowli, Hyderabad RR District

27. D. Laxman, S/o late D. Anantaiah aged 34 years ):c labourer rlo 1-41, Gachibowli, Hyderabad RR District 28- K. Sudhakar, S/o late K. Mallaiah aged 37 ve?rs , ),;c labourer rto 1-82, Gachibowli, Hyderabad RR District 29- R. Ashok @ Das, S/o late R. Mallaiah aged 62 ; > rrs Occ labourer rio Gachibowli, Hyderabad RR District

30. K. Krishna, S/o Durgaiah aged 55 years Occ laboure . rlo 1-97. Gachibowli,

31 . B. Yadagiri, S/o late Raiaram aged 58 years Oc I tabourer rlo 1-60t12. Gachibowli, Hyderabad, RR District

32. K. Danaiah, S/o Eraiah aEed 55 years Occ labourr:r rlo 1-34, Gachibowli, Hyderabad RR District

33. D. Narasimha, s/o Babaiah aged 78 years Occ l;rl curer r/o Gachibowli, Hyderabad RR District

34. D. Mysaiah, S/o Laxmaiah aged 73 years Occ labour e r/o 1-57, Gachibowti, Hyderabad RR District

35. G, Swamy, S/o Ballingaiah aged 63 years Occ laboure r/o 1-20, Gachibowti,

36. T. Mallesh, S/o T. Muthaiah aged 55 years Occ labou'e 'rlo 1-13, Gachibowli, Hyderabad RR District

37. M. Sudhakar, Sio late Pentaiah aged 33 years O c labourer rlo 1-26, Gachibowli, Hyderabad RR District. 38-Mr.M. Sanjay S/o Late M.Laxman, Aged 51 years R!r 1-6011612 Situated at Gachibowli Srilingampally Hyderabad RR District.T.S.5i )132.

39. Mr.M.Vittl [aVa!S/o 1_ate Manikyam, Aged 59 years !o 2-33 tndira Nagar Near bank Opp.Gachibowli Srilingampally Hyderabad tt I District T.S.500052 40,Smt.D.Shanthamma Wo Late D. Gandaiah, Aged 53 years Rl/o 1-Sil17tB Raje_ev Nagar_N_ear Egcgamma Temple Gachibowli Srli rllampally Hyderabad RR District.T.S.500032.

41. Smt. Thotla Santosha Wo Late Sri Rama Murfhy @ Ra ran Murthy, Aged 55 ygars Occ. House Wife_Gqchibowli OId Village -Ga ; i,rowti Sritinga-mpalty Hydenabad RR District.T.S. 500Gt2. Petitioner Nos.38,39,40, and 41 brought on re; rr.d deceased Petitioner Nos. P5, Pg,and P2O P22 :; 2510312021 in 1A No.1 ,2,3 and 4 ol 2O21. as Lrs of the per the C-o dt ... RESPONI) :r{TS/PETITIONERS

42. State of Telangana,, rep. by its Principal Secretary, Rere r.le Department Secretanat, Hyderabad.

43. Commissioner,, Social Welfare Department State of Tela rr;ana, Hyderabad.

44. A.P. Social Welfare Residential Educational lnstitutions : ()ciety, Hyderabad,

45. Telangana Social Welfare Residential Educational, lnstitutions Society. Hyderabad, rep. by its Secretary-

46. Andhra Pradesh Education & Welfare lnfrastructure, Development Corporatir:n, Hyderabad, rep. by its Managing Direclor-

47. Deputy Collector & Tahsildar, Serilingampalli Mandal, Ranga Reddy District

48. Sri G. Janardhan Reddy, s/o G. Yella Reddy, aged major, H, No.2-311E212, Shivajinagar Colony, Taranagar, Sherilingampally, Hyderabad. ...RESPONDENTS/RES PONDENTS Petition undei Section 151 CPC praying that in the circumstances stated in the affkJavit filed in support of the petition, the High Court may be pleased to vacate the order dt. 2O-3-2O15 passed in WPMP.NOS. 75A7 & 7588/2015 in WP.NO.5696/2015 in the interest of justice. Counsel for the Petitioner : SRI S.MANU Counsel for the Respondent No.1,3,4,6&8 : THE ADVOCATE GENERAL Counsel for the Respondents No.2&7 : SRI M.SUDHIR Counsel for the Respondent No.S : SRI N-BHUPAL REDDY, SC FOR TSWREIS Counsel for the Respondent No.9 : -- Counsel for the Respondent No.lO : GP FOR REVENUE The Court made the following: ORDER

HIGH COURT FIOR THE STATE OF TT' ,ANGANA HON'BLE SRI JUSTICE NAMAVARAP'U RA,J E.,SIIWAR RAO Dated this the 166 day of March :2O26 WRIT PETITION No.5696 of 1l )15 Between: M. Yadaiah and 40 others Petitioners AND The State of Telangana, represented by its Pr.r t:ipal Secretary, Revenue Departrnent, Hyderabad and 9 otiers .. Respondents

ORDER

This utril petition has been frled to declare:

(1) TIE Order in Proceeding No.tC1/43?( /20j3, dated

12. 1 1 .2013 issued bg the 7d respondent and_ al ; , ansequential proceedings No.BD/ 3542/ SCSP/ 20 11, dated 1(. 1!.2013 bsued bA the 4Ih resporu)ent and the letter No.D-l, :;E/A?EWIDC, Hgd;/ Comp-Gach.ibotoli/ Hyd/ 2013, dated O3.03. ) ) t4 and oLso

(2) 'I'he Hrgh handed action of the respondents it erfering with the possessrr:n oI the petitioners of their respe,c\ nz patto land.s for uthich the petitioners haue paid. SUk of the lan c r nlue as frxed. bg the Gouemm.ent and also

(3) The action of the 7d, reslnn-denl in not retumlr,7 their originl respectiue Wttn ertifmte, whirh uere pledgec uhile receiuing loans, euen ajter clearing the loan anlounts o: bemg illegal- Consequently, set osid.e tle aboue proeedings \ t directing ttrc 7n respond.ent to return the Wtta ertifiates ) ' directing tLrc offtcial respondents not to interfere uith the poss z;sion ol their respectiue plots situated in Gachiboutli Viltage, I eritingampally Mandal, R. R. Distn-ct and not ,o dsposses-s i 1e petitioners utithout lollouing due proess of laut,

(4) Direcr the 2'd respondent to inplenBnt the scheflE bA proui.ding / returning the pattadar certifuntes dt:OS'O3 1982 to lhe petitioners and direct the resporulent No.6 [or toking approprinte action, as the Tahsildar/ respndent No'8 is tLre appropriate authoritg under Sections 6 & 7 of Acl, 9 of 2020'

(5) The Resuntption Proceedings No.D/ 1654/86' dated 25.06.1986 issued bg tle RDO' CleuelLt, R R' D6'ncr, inctuding ponclanama protnedings No.B/536/2O13 doted 16'1 1 2013 issued bg tE respondent No.8, are null and uoid'

(6) Directing respondent No.2 & RIX), Cheuella Diuision, nortt Rajendranagar Diuision, R R. DtsrricLo t:ssue Jinal Wtta certiftcates in fawur oJ petttioners or tleir legal heirs, on deposit of ttrc batancc 50%o of ttrc sdle @nsideration, alreadg decided at the time of bsuance of patta certifletes in the gear 1982, in resped of the subiect plots of land' bg the petitioners or their legal lneirs/ agents, and pass such othcr order or orders os mtg deem frt ond propq in the ciranstones of the (nse'

2. Heard Sri Manu, learned counsel for the petitioners, Sri M. Sudhir, learned counsel appearing for the respondent Nos'2 arrd 7, Sri N. Bhupal Reddy, learned Standing Counsel appea-ring for TSWREI Society/respondent No'5, arrd learned Advocate General, appearing for respondent Nos'1, 3, 4, 6 and

8. Perused the record.

3. Brief facts of the case are as follows:

(i) AII the petitioners belong to SC and ST communities, and they all come under the below povert5r line' While so, in accordalce with the policy of the erstwhile

Government of Andhra Pradesh, all the petiti issued patta certificates to an extent ( admeasuring 242 sq. yards each in Sy.No. 13 under Kothaguda Gram Panchayat, R.R. I Serilingampally Mandal) on payment of half.of land Frxed by the Government and layout wa the Revenue Divisiona,l Offrcer, Chevella Divisi in the year 1982. The total land allotted to r I way of issuance of patta certificates comes to r\

(ii) Initially, the said layout was sarctioned for the construction of a shed to rt by the petitioners. All the petitioners obtzj Calara Bank, Feelkhana Branch, Hyderabad, t SC and ST Financial Corporation, for the const for running poultry farms, and each petitione r loan of Rs. 18,6OO-OO in the year 1982. Tht: executed simple mortgage deeds in favour of rl pledging their properties, and ttre loan instrr paid from six months after the induction of rl day old chicks, in equal instaiments i.e. Rs.3 L with interest. rrrers have been f vacant land 5 of Gachibowli istrict (now in the value of the ; sanctioned by >:r, R.R. District r: petitioners by :,O3.38 Guntas. prepared arrd rL poultry farms red loans from rrough the then r-rction of streds rvas sanctioned petitioners had e said Bank by rnents were be r: frrst batch of )-OO per month

(iii) All the petitioners constructed sheds, and poultries were established and produced poultry products and the same were taken by the Bank, SC a.nd ST Corporation, and they promised to adjust the cost of the same against tJ.e loans etc., Subsequently, as per the guidelines of tJ:re tna respondent, the petitioners were issued house patta certihcates in lieu of the poultry sheds they had surrendered to tl.e Government. Thus, the petitioners hold the house site patta certificates in their favour, which are still subsisting, and the patta lands are in their uninterrupted possession- (i") When the petitioners' patta cerLifrcates are subsisting and petitioners are in possession of their respective patta lands, some persons/labourers claiming to have been sent by the unofficial respondent for construction of compound wall by evicting the petitioners, carne to their property on 24.02.2015 at about 11 a.m. along with some persons who are claiming to be ttre subordinates of offrcial Respondents. When the petitioners resisted their illegal activity and informed them that we are holding valid patta certilicates issued by the Government and that we cannot be dispossessed without fotlowing due process of law. Then, the subordinates informed us that they have proceedings to evict tlt: petitioners or interfere with their possession. (") The 2nd respondent issued p.', <:eedings dated l2.Il.20l3 allotting petitioners' Iand in f a z:ur of the 3.a respondent for the construction of Teachers ( :.pacity Building Centre and new APSWR Social complex Lr-rd it is these proceedings that are being impugned in k'e instant writ petition as being illegal, arbitrary and unconst tutional.

4. l,earned counsel for the petitioners ; r bmits that the issuance of the proceedings dated 12.L1.2a 13 came to the petitioners' notice when the respondents trie J r o interfere with the petitioners' possession over their propertie ; on 24.O2.2015. Based on the said proceedings, the 4tt' r:;pondent issued proceedings dated lO. 12.2013 sanctioning r sum of Rs.7O lakhs for the construction of a compound wa[ .br the land and requested the 6ft respondent to obtain techr i:al sanction for the construction of the said buildings.

5. [.earned counsel for the petitioners furt rer submits that subsequently, the Superintending Engir r e r of the 6tn respondent issued a letter dated 03.03. i : 14 to the 9n respondent asking him to submit certain c.ocuments, and allotted the work of construction of the compound wall in the petitioners' Iand. In this matter, the petitioners are sought to be dispossessed of their vacant patta lands for which they have paid half the value of the land as hxed by the Government in 1982 itselL

6. Learned counsel for'the petitioners further submits that, taking undue advantage of the petitioners' illiteracy, poverty, and their status as members of oppressed and disadvantaged communities, the respondents acted in a high-handed manner and in complete violation of the principles of natural justice. Despite the the pelitioners' pattas being in existence and the Government having already collected 5Oo/o of the land va1ue, the respondents have sought to deprive the petitioners of their land, which has been in their continuous possession and occupation since 1982. By virtue of the impugrted proceedings of the 2"d respondent and the consequential actions initiated by the other official respondents, the petitioners are being unlawfully sought to be dispossessed of their lands without adherence to the due process of law. Accordingly, prayed to allow the Writ Petition. 7 . Learned counsel for t1le respondents No.2 and 7 filed a counter afiidavit by contending that t.l e loan from the

Commercial Banks was initially utilize < towards the construction of the shed for 500 birds, and the ltalance amount was utilized towards working capital, along .r'ith the Margin Money and Subsidy given by the Scheduled )astes Society & DRDA. As commercial banks insisted on r;, ourity from the beneFrciaqr, a decision was taken to issue par.l ls to the Poultry Complex benehciaries as to enable them to rt ).tgage this land to obtain a bank loan for working capital ar rl infrastructure development. In other words, in the instant ( €.se, pattas were issued only to facilitate the beneficiaries i r obtaining bank Ioans to run the Poultry Complexes sanctionec -o them and eke out their livelihood.

8. [,earned counsel for the respondents Nr .2 and 7 further contended that the construction of the uni l was started on L3.O4.19a2 with 38 units. The Canara I zrnk, Feelkhana Branch, is the Frnancing Bank of the G: :hibowli Poultry Complex. However, because poultry is z highly skilled business, the Scheduled caste beneficiaries :culd not run it effectively and aII the units became defunct rjthin one or two years. The benehciaries ran the P oultry C< r tplex for 3 to 4 years, after which it became sick. The p1,r .J tr5l Complex is vacant since, 1986. The beneficiaries could r:t clear the loan E arnounts to the bank or repay the Margin money to the Ranga Reddy District Scheduled Castes Service Cooperative Society Ltd., Ranga Reddy District. No beneirciary repaid the loan taken from the Commercial Banks.

9. [,earned counsel for the respondents No.2 and 7 further contended that at this juncture, the District Collector/ Chairman, Ranga Reddy District Scheduled Castes Service Cooperative Society Ltd., after having a discussion with the concerned Banker, has decided to reimburse the cost of the shed and 5Oo/o interest on the loan amount to the bankers. The Vice Chairman and Managing Director of AP. Scheduled Castes Service Cooperative Finance Corporation Limited, Hyderabad (APSCCFC Ltd., Hyderabad) has released an amount of Rs. 102.O0 l,akhs to the Ralga Reddy District Scheduled Castes Service Cooperative Societ5r Ltd., for repayment of Bank l,oans for 461 sheds in the District vide Proc. No. D2/6847IAPSC/85 dated 30.11.1985, subject to the condition that 461 Poultry Sheds along with land should be registered in the name of Andhra Pradesh Scheduted Castes Service Cooperative Finance Corporation Limited, Hyderabad (in short APSCCFC Ltd., Hyderabad). Accordingly, the loan dues repaid by the District Society, Ranga Reddy, on behalf of APSCCFC Ltd., were paid

from the funds released by the Corporatiolr Ultimately, the said Poultry Sheds have become the property rl the District SC Service Cooperative Socielr Ltd., Ranga Red,l . District, as the dues were paid by APSCCFC Ltd.

10. [-earned counsel for the respondents Nr .2 and 7 further contended that the APSCCFC Ltd., vide procdgs. No.D2/6aa7 /APSC/85, da.ted 3O.11.1985 : sued categorical orders for payment of Bank loan that was <1,r,: to commercial banks in Ranga Reddy District from the (SCl ) Special Central Assistance funds with the following condition s

a) The Collector/Chairman should u t Lze the amount within 15 days and send Utilization r ),:rtrFrcate in the proforma prescribed,

b) The 461 Poultry Sheds in Ranga Re< < 1, District should be registered in the name of A.P i:heduled Castes Cooperative Finance Corporation Lirr i:ed, Hyderabad (APSCCFC Ltd.) after paying the dues c wards the shed cost to banks and clear docurrrents shor lC be maintained including title to the lard.

c) The liabilities toward s the shed cost ; rculd be properly reconciled and estimated accurately r'1 the Accounts Section of the Ranga Reddy District [ <:heduled Castes Service Cooperative Society and then ,r rV the payments should be made to the Banks.

d) A reasonable/suitable rent shoulrl x: collected from the beneficiaries in easy instalments, q I ich is convenient to the beneficiaries.

e) Proper/ Necessary documentation r ith the Banks should be done while repayment.

11. lrarned counsel for the respondents No.2 and 7 further contended that the District Collector's vide lctter No.C/ 1382/SC/RR/86, dated 2r.O4.19a6, ordered for resumption of land of various Poultry Complexes in Ranga Reddy District to the District Scheduled Castes Service Society, Ranga Reddy District. In his Proceedings No.D/ 1654/86, dated 25.06.1986, the revenue Divisional offrcer, Chevella, resumed the lands and re-allotted to the District Society, Ranga Reddy, including the land mentioned in the writ petition at Gachibowli by the petitioners. The District SC Society, Ranga Reddy is in absolute possession of land as per the above orders. Since then, tJle poulry complex in Gachibowli, has been in the effective possession of respondents 2 ald 4.

12. Learned counsel for the respondents No.2 and 7 further contended that as the beneficiaries became willful defaulter and absconded from the site of the Poultry Complex for about 4-5 years, the RR District SC Society repaid bank loan portion of all tlre (38) beneFrciaries amounting to Rs.7 ,51,298 / - through cheque No. 054156, dated 06.07.1987 to Canara Bank, Feelkhana Branch, Hyderabad. The entire property was hypothecated to the R.R. District SC Society by the beneliciaries through mortgage deeds.

13. learned counsel for the respondents N:1] and 7 further contended that the pattas granted in the vr zr 1982 by the Revenue Divisional OfIicer, Chevella Division, I .R.District, were only for the purpose of availrnent of Ba-r < Loan for the construction of Poultry Sheds. The Gachibow.li ['oultry Complex Sheds (38) were allotted to (38) SC benehc .; r ies in the year 1982, but the beneficiaries failed to contin: I their business and became defaulters to the Bank as we[ as I I the SC Society, Ranga Reddy District and the dues of the Brr r<s were paid by this Societ5z, and the said propert5z becam e the SC Society property. As such, the (38) SC beneficiaries a :: to resume the Poultry Business at this stage. Iz+. Learned counsel for the respondents Nr .2 and 7 further contended that the claim of the petitione r s that they are absolute owners of the Poultry Sheds of Por lry Complex, as the Revenue Divisional Offrcer, Chevella, gar : them pattas, is devoid of merit since the entire amounts wer: paid by the SC Socie{ and became the propertlr holder . The Revenue Divisional Officer, Chevella Division, nev,: consulted this Society on the granting of pattas. The be r e ficiaries neither occupied the sheds after they became defar lter to the Bank and this Society, nor continued the Poultry bt siness thereafter, t2 ttrereby defeating the purpose of the Government's Self Employment provision as such the clairn may not be admissible. The ownership of tJle land of the Poultry Complex is vested with this Society. Accordingly, prayed to dismiss the above Writ Petition

15. lrarned counsel for the respondent No.S f-rled counter affidavit by reiterating the contents of the counter allidavit frled by the respondents No.2 and 7, contended that tl e Principal Secretary, Social Welfare Depa-rtment is requested the District Collector/Chairmal, Ranga Reddy District, to take immediate necessary steps to resurne the land of Ac.4.1O guntas of Gachibowli Poultry Complex and re-allot/alienate to the Commissioner of Social Welfare/ Secretary, APSWREIS, F.{yderabad for construction of Teachers capacity Building Center and a new APSWR School Complex under SC Sub-Plan. The District Collector, Ranga Reddy District, based on the Government Memo No.658 lRS.2 /2OO3-1, dated 22.06.2013, has handed over the Gachibowli Poultry Complex land for ttre construction of the Teachers' Capacity Building Centre and new APSWR School Complex as per the Panchanama No:B/536/2013, dated 16.11.2O13 of the Revenue Inspector, Serilingampally Mandal.

16. l,earned counsel lor the responderr No.5 further contended that on 16.1 1.2013, the said lanc was allotted to this 5h respondent through Pannchanan r . and this sth respondent immediately leveled the land fo r :onstruction of Teachers Capacity Building and a new .A . ).Social Welfare Residential School in the said land. Thi,; 5d respondent approved the proposed estimated cost of Rs.i 1.00 Crores and out of this, an admhistrative sanction r ., r; accorded for Rs.7O.00 lakhs for the construction of thr t)e6p611nd wall through Procgs. Rc.No.BD/3542lSCSF l2oll, dated l0.l2.2ol3 and the said work is a-lmost cor-r :leted except for the erecLion o[ the main gate only. The c< 1 ies of the Patta certficates firled by ttre Writ petitioners are r c,t related to the said land and they were never engaged in thr: trroultr5r business after 1986. There are no poultry sheds or horLr (:s except for two dilapidated sheds used by the securify 1;uards of this respondent Society. Accordingly, prayed to lismiss the Writ Pe tition. FINDINGS OF THE COURT:

17. The contention of the petitioners is thal hey belong to SC and ST communities, and they all come rnder the below poverty [ine. While so, in accordance with he policy of the t4 erstwhile Government of Andhra Pradesh, all the petitioners have been issued patta certificates to an extent of vacant land admeasuring 242 sq.yards each in Sy. No. 136 of Gachibowli under Kothaguda Gram Panchayat, R.R. District (now in Serilingampally Mandal) on payment of half of the value of ttre land fixed by the Government and layout was sanctioned by the Revenue Divisional Offrcer, Chevella Division' R.R. District in the year 1982. All the petitioners obtained loans from Canara Bank, Feelkhana Branch, Hyderabad, through the then SC and ST Financial Corporation, for the construction of sheds for running poultry farms, and each petitioner was sanctioned a loan of Rs.18,6OO-00 in the year 1982. The loan instalments should be paid starting from six months after induction of the Frst batch of day old chicks in equal instalments i-e. Rs.31O-00 per month with interest.

18. Subsequently, as per the guidelines of the 2"d respondent, the petitioners had been issued house patta certifrcates in lieu of the poultry sheds surrendered by them to the Government. Thus, the petilioners have been holding the house site patta certificates to date, and the patta lands are in their unintermpted possession. While so, the RDO, Chevella, R.R. District, issued resumption proceedings No.D/ 1654/46'

dated 25.O6. 1986. By virtue of the impugrI e 1 proceedings of the 2"a respondent and the consequential ar: itns initiated by the other official respondents, the petitr< rrers are being unlawfully sought to be dispossessed of the r:. lands without adherence to the due process of [aw.

19. The contention of the respondents i:; _hat the pattas granted in the year L982 by the Revenue I ivisional Officer, Chevella Division, R. R. District, were only lc r the purpose of availment of Bank Loarl for the construction r[ Poultrv Sheds. The Gachibowli Poultry .Complex Sheds ii8) i.e. 32 for Scheduled Caste people and 06 for Sched t t:d Tribe people were allotted to (38) SC beneficiaries in the., itl 1982, but the beneficiaries failed to continue their busi r :ss and becarne defaulters to the Bank as well as to the ti ) Societlr, Ranga Reddy District and the dues of the Banks \ /,rre paid by this Society, and the said property became the Srl tlocietJr property. As such, not allowed the (38) SC beneficiiui :s to resume tJle Poultry Business at that stage. The Princip; r Secretary, Social Welfare Depa,rtment, requested the District Colleetor/Chairman, Ranga Reddy District, t I take immediate necessary steps to resume the land of \ :.4.10 gtntas of Gachibowli Poultry Complex and re-allot / alienate to the

Commissioner of Social Welfare/Secretary, APSWREIS, Hyderabad, for the construction of Teachers Capacity Building Centre and a new APSWR School Complex under SC Sub-Plan- The District Collector, Ranga Reddy District, based on the Government Memo No.658|RS.2/2OO3- l, dated 22.06.2013, has handed over the Gachibowli Poultry Complex land for the construction of the Teachers' Capaciry Building Centre and new APSWR School Complex as per the Panchanama No:B/536/2013, dated 16.11.2O13 of the Revenue Inspector, Serilingampally Mandal.

20. [t is not in dispute that all the petitioners have been issued patta certificates to an extent of vacant land admeasuring 242 sq. ya-rds each in Sy.No. 136 of Gachibowli under Kothaguda Gram Panchayat, R.R. District (now in Serilingampally Mandal) on payrnent of half of the value of the land fxed by the Government and layout was sanctioned by the Revenue Divisional Ofhcer, Chevelia Division, R.R. District in the year 1982. While issuing orders for allofment of patta Iands to the benehciaries, certain conditions were stipulated vide Lr.No.B/4/336/82, dated 05.03.1982, and below the signature of the Revenue Divisional Offrcer, Chevella Division, of the said order, it is mentioned in detail that the persons who L7 pay the total decided amount of the land, ther rnmediately, the final patta certificate will be given to them. -he respondents did not bring to the notice of this Court th: - the petitioners have violated any of the conditions mentione,i in the allotment of patta land s. 2I. As per the contention of the learnei <:ounsel for the petitioners, resumpLion proceedings were issued without following the due process of law i.e. without s suing any notice to the petitioners and thc petitioners have t,een continuing their possession in their respective houses an( :rre ready to pay half of the balance amount decided while ir l()tting the patta lands and clear all their debts due to the barr : for getting the hnal patta certificate. At the time of admiss;: rn, after hearing both sides, this Court granted Status Quo or 2O.O3.2O15 and the petitioners have continued to possess ov e : their respective houses to date.

22. The contention of the responden t ; is that the construction of the units was started on lli t)4. 1982 with 38 units. The Canara Ba-nk, Feelkhana Brancl L is the hnancing Bank of the Gachibowli Poultry Complex. I owever, because Poultry is a highly skilled business, the lcheduled Caste beneficiaries could not run the units effec - ,.,ely, and all the

units became defunct within one or two yezrs. The benehciaries ran the Poultry Complex for 3 to 4 years, after which it became sick. The Poultry Complex has been vacalt since 1986. The beneficiaries could not clear the loal amounts to the bank or repay the Margin money to the Ralga Reddy District Scheduled Castes Service CooperaLive Society Ltd., Ranga Reddy District. No benehciaqr repaid the loan taken from the Commercial Banks. At this juncture, the District Collector/ Chairman, Ranga Reddy District Scheduled Castes Service Cooperative Society Ltd., after discussion with the concerned Banker, has decided to reimburse the cost of the shed and 5O7o interest on the loan amounts to the banker. The Vice Chairman and Managing Director of AP. Scheduled Castes Service Cooperative Finance Corporation Limited, Hyderabad (APSCCFC Ltd., Hyderabad) has released an amount of Rs. 102.O0 t"akhs to the Ranga Reddy District Scheduled Castes Service Cooperative Sociely Ltd., for repayment of Bank Loans for 461 sheds in the District vide Proc. No. D2 /6847 /APSC/8S dated 30. 11.1985, subject to the condition that 461 Poultry Sheds along with land should be registered in the name of Andhra Pradesh Scheduled Castes Service Cooperative Finance Corporation Limited, Hyderabad (in short APSCCFC Ltd.,

Hyderabad). Accordingly, the loan dues repai, by the District Society, Ranga Reddy, on behalf of APSCCF,- Ltd., were paid from the funds released by the Corporation l'his fact is not disputed by the learned counsel for the petitior e rs.

23. Learned counsel for the petitioners soua rt a direction to the respondents for the issuance of hnal pat e. certificates as the petitioners are ready to pay half of the bzrlr r,ce €unount and clear the loal amounts due to the Bank, whir I were avaitsc[ 6y them. At this juncture, the point for conside: r,_ion is, rvhether the half o[ the balance amount to be paid as ter the present market value or as per the market value prt:r.t iting in the year 1982. To overcome this, the learned counsel i r the petitioners has relied upon the order of this Court in i,.P.No. 18207 of 20 1 1, dated 07 .Oa.2Ol2, wherein at para No 1 z , ir is observed as under: '24. The writ petition is acardingly aLlowed, ,t dated 2O.5.2O11, passed bg tte 2"d responden,., dtected pagnwnt of mnrket ualue, ot th-e preu,t set asid.e. The 3 respondent shnll uerify the rect found that tlle market ualue as on the dab of th,. by him, Le. 18.6.1994, is auaiktble, he shall co r sanrc to the Wtitioners for deposit of the same. 'l hand, tte reard is silent, he stall determine u' uittt referene to that date, uithin a period oJ .;t inlonn the petitioners. The petitioners shatl .t deposit the market ualue so communidTted to tt .(l thP. order, insofar os it 'itg rates, b c'., ard if it is t'der possed TLuruutte the 'tn the other r orket uolue : ueeks ond ' entitled to ?,n- uithin a period of 8 uEeks from the d.ate of receiuing the information, in uiling." [,earned counsel for the petitioners further informed that no appeal has been preferred against the above mentioned order and the said order has attained hnality. The said submission is not drsputed by the learned counsel for the respondents.

24. For the foregoing reasons, the Order in Proceeding No.LC1l437Ol2O13, dated l2.ll.2Ol3, issued by the 2"d respondent, consequential proceedings No. BD I 3542 / SCSP I 2oll, dated 1O.12.2013 issued by the 4th respondent, letter No. D2lSE/APEWIDC-Hyd/Comp-Gachibo wli/ Hyd. / 2013, dated O3.O3.2014 issued by the Superintending Engineer, APEWIDC, Hyderabad, and the Resumption Proceedings No.D/ 165a/86, dated 25.06.1986 issued by the RDO, Chevella, R.R. District, including panchanama proceedings No.B/536/2013 dated 16.11.2013 issued by the respondent No.8 are set aside. The petitioners are directed to deposit the balance 5Oo/" of the sale consideration prevailing the market value as on the date of issuing the orders for allotment of patta lands, dated 05.03.1982, apart from clearing the bank loans in respect of their shares within a period of (02) two montfrs from the date of' receipt of the copy of this order. In respect of such payments, the respondent authorities are directed to iss ,,r : final pattas to the petitioners.

25. With the above directions, the Writ petiti: I is disposed of. There shall be no order as to costs. As a sequel, miscellaneous applications :ending, if any, in this Writ Petition, shall stand closed.

//TRUE COPY// I SD/-MOHD.ISMAIL l'f'ul'-::1y:=/ \secnoru oFFrcER To,

The Principal Secretarv. Revenue Depa(ment Secr:.triat, Telangana State, Hyderabad. The District Collector, Ranga Reddy District at Hyder : r,rd., -

3. The Commissioner,, Social Hyderabad.

4. The Secretary, A.p. Social Society, Hyderabad. Welfare Departmen State ol Telangana, Welfare Residential I clucational lnstitutions,

5. The Secretary Telanoana Social Welfare Residentia :ducational, lnstitutions Society, Hyd6rabad. " 6' The Manaoinq Director Andhra pradesh Education 3 'y'y'erfare rnfrastructure. Development Corporation, nVOeraOiO. -

7. The Vice Chairman and Managing D.irector, Telan; tra Scheduled Castes Coop. Development Corp. ltA,, tiyO-eraUaO.

t. Ilin8"rrry Coflecror & Tahsildar, Seritingampali /andat. Ranga Reddy 9' The Revenue Divisionar officer, chevera Now Rajenrr anagar, R R. District.

10. OneCC to SRt S.MANU, Advocare. tOpUCl CCs to TF|E ADVOCATE ngana at Hyderabad. [OUT] GENERAL, High (.ourt for the State of 'l2.One CC to SRt M.SUDH|R, Advocate. tOpUCl

13. One CC to SRt S.BHUPAL REDDY, SC for Te : rgana Social Wetfare Res id entia I Ed uca tiona I, tn stitution i Soie-tvl lO? uc t 'l4.Two CCs to Gp FOR REVENUE, High Cou( for thr ljtate of Telangana at Hyderabad. [OUTI

15. Tvro CD Copies. wo e{a T T

M BSK

HIGH COURT DATED:1610312026 a/-.- \ w,/ ) o O

.i\ ra'Y-v ,ac\ E {(r

ORDER

WP.No.5696 of 2015 DISPOSING OF THE WRIT PETITION WITHOUT COSTS I Nb 1 \q