Telangana High Court
WP/4677/2026 of M/ s. CRR-CIPPL-GVRIIPL (JV), Vs The Chairman and Managing Director Singareni Collieries Company Limited on 11 March 2026
COURT FOR THE STATE OF TELANGANA AT HYDERABAD (Special Original Jurisdiction) WEDNESDAY, THE ELEVENTH DAY OF TUARCH TWO THOUSAND AND TWENTY SIX PRESENT THE HONOURABLE SRt JUSTICE NAGESH BHEEMAPAKA PETI 4677 [ 3300 ] ...PET!TIONER Between M/s. cRR-clPPL-GVRllqL (JV), Rep. by its by Authorized
IN THE HIGH COURT FOR THE STATE OF TELANGANA
AT HYDERABAD
(Special Original Jurisdiction)
WEDNESDAY, THE ELEVENTH DAY OF TUARCH
TWO THOUSAND AND TWENTY SIX
PRESENT
THE HONOURABLE SRt JUSTICE NAGESH BHEEMAPAKA
PETI
...PET!TIONER
Between
M/s. cRR-clPPL-GVRllqL (JV), Rep. by its by Authorized person chaila B."glyp"!T _Rqd{y s/o. chajta .tVlaila'
Reddy nseo about so yeJrJ,- ottice at
Flat No. 501, sainivas Enclave, H.No. 3-11'-1472 Ramanthap,ir, HvbJraoao -
13.
AND
1.
2.
3.
4.
5.
6.
The Chairman and Managing. Director Singareni Collieries Company Limited, fothagudem collie-ries -SozJ o1 Bhadradrl-Kothagudem Districi The singareni colleries company Limited, Rep. u! its Director (p and p)
[othagudem collieries -507101 Bhadradri-xotraguoem District.
The Singareni colleries company Limited, Kotha[udem Collieries -507101
B."p !V i1s pipe.ctor (O and R) afr-aOradri-Kothagu"dem District The Singareni co_lleries c^ompany.Limited, Repl by its General lvlanager (CM)
{othagudem collieries -507101 Bhadradri-t<oihaguoem District. v \
Ihe sing.are.ni colleries c..ompany-L1ry1teQ. Rep. bry its General Manager, Sri B.rrplr Kothaqudem coilieries -5oz t 0 1 B h ad rao ii-Kotnag udem D istiict.
I1"_P,.lggreni colleries..compaly_L1miled, Rep. by its prq-'ect officer -(sRp- ocP) Kothagudem collieries -507101 Bhadradri Kothagudem District.'
...RESPONDENTS
Petition under Article 226 of the Constitution of lndia praying that in the circumstances stated in the affidavit filed therewith, the High Court may be pleased to issue a writ or order more particularly one in the nature of mandamus, declaring inaction of Respondents in not issuing gate pass to vehicles and other equipments, as shown in the annexure as illegal, arbitrary, in violation of Article 14, 19(1Xg) and 3004 of Constitution of lndia and consequently direct the Respondents to issue gate pass to petitioner vehicles to vehicles, machinery and other equipment and permit the vehicles to ply at its choice.
lA NO: 1 OF 20',16
Petition under Section 151 CPC praying that in the circumstances stated in the affidavit file,d in support of the petition, the High Court may be pleased to grant interim direction to Respondents not to retain the vehicles of Petitioner and other equipment as mentioned in Annexure, pending disposal of the main petition.
Counsel for the, Petitioner: SRI L.HARISH
Counset for the' Respondents: SRI P.SRI HARSHA REDDY, SC FOR
SINGARENI COLLIERIES CO LTD
The Court mad,g the following: ORDER
IN THE HIGH COURT FOR THE STATE OF TELANGANA
AT HYDERABAD
THE HONOURABLE SRI JUSTICE NAGESH BHEEMAPAI(A
WRIT PETITION No.4677 of 2026
11.O3.2026
Between:
M / s. CRR-CIPPL-GVRIIPL(JV),
Petitioner
AND
The Chairman and Managing Director
Singareni Collieries Company Limited
Kothagudem Collieries - 507101
Bhadradri-Kothagudem District & 5 others
...Respondents
Citations and Judicial Treatment
Cited by
0
Decisions in the index citing it
Cites
0
Decisions referred to
In this index
0
Of the decisions it cites
Overruled / Questioned
0
No negative treatment found
Loading the citing and cited decisions…
This judgment in the centre: on the left the decisions it cites, on the right the decisions citing it. Colour is the treatment; choose a decision to open it.
ORDER:
This Writ Petition is filed questioning the action of the respondents in not issuing the gate pass to the petitioners vehicles and other equipment as mentioned in Annexure as illegal, arbitrary, violative of Articles 14, 19(1)(g) and 300-A of constitution of lndia, consequently to direct the respondents to issue gate pass to the petitioners vehicles and permit to ply the same at their choice of place.
2. Heard Sri P.Venugopal, learned counsel representing Sri L.Harish, learned counsel for petitioner and Sri P.Sri Harsha Reddy, learned Standing Counsel for Singareni Collieries ""TlTy Limited for respondents. Perused the record.
3' when the matter is taken up for hearing, rearned counse:l for petitioner submitted that the issue raised in this writ Petition is squarely covered by the order passed by this court in w'p'No'550 of 2024, dated 23.or.2024 and therefo::e, the same order may be passed i' this writ petition as welr' The operative portion of the said order reads as under: "15. In view of the aforesaid submissions, vvith the consent of both the farties, the Writ Petition is disposed of at the "a*i""io" "a"S;, directing the respondents to issue gate passes .to the petitioner,s vehict"" "rU.j""?T the,petitioner paying the amount due to the workers." 4' Learned Standing counsel for singareni collieries Compan;7 Limited appearing for the respondents, on instructirrns, praced on record the written instructions addressed from respondent No.6, dated 24.02.2025, wherei, it is stated that there is no clause in the agreement to retain the vehir:les pending any dispute, however clause No. 1'a(A)(n) of the order provides for obtaining prior approvar in case of withdrawar of any equipment by the contractor from the Project. ,
5. Intermsoftheorderpassed.bythisCourtinW.P.No.550 of2024,dated23.oL.2o24,andforthereasonsalike,this writpetitionisdisposedofdirectingtherespondentsto issubgatepassestothepetitioner,svehicles.Thereshallbe no order as to costs. Pending miscellaneous applications' if any' shall stand closed SD/.P. PONN A KRISHNA ISTANT REGI STRAR /TRUE COPY/' SECTION OFFICER To
2.
8. I PSK
CC TODAY HIGH COURT DATED i1t 110312026
ORDER
WP.No.41677 of 2026 DISPOSING OF THE WRIT PETITION WITHOU'T COSTS (D 13 l{AH 2026 -t l'.:,:- o LJ t: s "(