Telangana High Court
CRP/1820/2024 of A.R.Gandhi Rajan Vs Godavarthi Nageswar Rao on 9 March 2026
COURT FOR THE STATE OF TELANGANA AT HYOERABAD MONDAY, THE NINTH DAY OF MARCH.TWO TTIOUSAND AND TWENTY SIX PRESENT THE HONOURABLE SRI JUSTICE NAMAVARAPU RAJESHWAR RAO Petition under Article 227 of lhe Constitution^ of -lndia' against the Order dated: 16-4-2o24oassed in I A
IN THE HIGH COURT FOR THE STATE OF TELANGANA
AT HYOERABAD
MONDAY, THE NINTH DAY OF MARCH
.TWO
TTIOUSAND AND TWENTY SIX
PRESENT
THE HONOURABLE SRI JUSTICE NAMAVARAPU RAJESHWAR RAO
Petition under Article 227 of lhe Constitution^of -lndia' against the Order dated:
16-4-2o24oassed in I A N":'3d;#;z"al" os rl"'a or iota' oi tn" fil" of the court of trrl t noaitional District Judge' at Khammam'
Between:
A.R.Gandhi Rajan, S/o A' Rama Chandran Ayyam Peruman @ Ramachandran Nadar, Aged about oz "i"itl b""' eislness' R/o H No 5'4-1541B,t3'
il'1rrri,"'itX",, Near Marret Vard' Khammam City and District'
'.'Revision Petitioner/Petitioner/Defendant CIVIL REVISION
AND
l.A. NO: 10F 2024
CRP.
Counsel for the Petitioner
Counsel for the ResPondents
The Court made the following
PETITI ON NO: 1820 0F 2024
: Sri Srikanth Hariharan
: Sri Madiraju Prabhakar Rao
Citations and Judicial Treatment
Cited by
0
Decisions in the index citing it
Cites
0
Decisions referred to
In this index
0
Of the decisions it cites
Overruled / Questioned
0
No negative treatment found
Loading the citing and cited decisions…
This judgment in the centre: on the left the decisions it cites, on the right the decisions citing it. Colour is the treatment; choose a decision to open it.
: ORDER
1, Godavarthi Nageswar Rao' S/o'Rama R.'!, ?q".d about 47 years' Occ' Business' irc rtrr.irr"g;tem, rn"mmam City and District'
2. Kampati Raia, S/o Narasimha Rao' Aged about 34 years' Occ"Agriculture' R/o' ' ffi#iil;;;; Vlr.g", x"h;;'"' i"irMandal' Khammam District' ...Respondents/Respondents/Plaintiffs petition under Section 151 cpc prayhg.that in the circumstances stated in the affidavit filed in support ot tn""p"iltion, ihe Hign court mav be pleased to grant stay of atlfurther proceedings i" ci5ffi:T;ildre in-tn" fite of the i Roa oitt'i"t Judge' At Khammam, pursuant ,o ,nu'iili 0"" ieall i ioz+ in lA No 33B ot 2024 in os No 8 of 2018 0n the fire of th" rA;diliJ.ct.tudge, nt Khammam, pending disposar of the IN THE HIGH COURT FOR THE STATE OF'1] }LANGANA AT HYDERABAD THE HON'BLE SRI JUSTICE NAMAVARAPU RA.J ESHWAR RAO O9th March, 2026 CIVIL REVISION PETITION No.182O OI 2024 Between: A.R.Gandhi Rajan ...Petitioner AND Godavarthi Nagesu'ar Rao ald another ...Respondents
ORDER
Heard Mr.Srikanth Hariharan, learned counsei br the petitioner and Mr. Madiraju Prabhakar Rao, learned counsel for tlr respondents.
2. l,earned counsel lor the petitioner su ] nits that the petitioner filed I.A.No. 338 of 2024 in O.S. No. 8 of 201i on the file of the Hon'ble I Additional District Judge at Khammam to re :eive the petition mentioned four docnments. But out of four document;, the trial Court received only document Nos. 1 and 3 and did not rece.\ : document No.2 and there is no u.hisper regarding document No.4.
3. l,earned counsel for the petitioner further subrr ts that the trial Court did not appreciate the plea regarding the petiti ner,s interaction I
2 with the Chamber of Commerce, which is taken in the written statement. The very reply letter dated 07.10.2O17 which was in response to the letter of Chambcr of Commerce Khammam dated 04. 10.2017 clearly shows the reference to the ietter written by Chamber of Commerce Khammam. But the trial Court did not receive the said documents. Accordingly, prayed to allow the present Civii Revision Petition.
4. Learned counsel for the respondents did not oppose the submissions made by the learned counsel for the petitioner.
5. In that vicw of the matter, this Court is inclined to set aside the order dared 16.04.2024 in I.A.No.338 ot 2024 in O.S.No.8 of 2018 and remand the matter to the Trial Court for fresh consideration with regard to document Nos.2 and 4.
6. With the above said direction, this Civil Revision Petition is disposed of. There sha.ll be no order as to costs. As a sequel, miscellaneous applications pending, if any, in this Petition, shall stand closed. sd,- P.c' sULEKHA DEVI ASSISTANT REGISTRAR ,,TRUE COPY// CTION OFFICER To,
1. The I Additional District Judge at Khammam l ; ;" ;; r*, .***;1ffi'ffi\H'""1li,l"""li"it.ro
3. One CC to SRI' MADIRP
4. Two CD CoPies ba/kam G
HIGH COURT DATED: 09/03/2026 s $ STfi iI:t ++.- 1[ 'tl,l
ORDER
CRP.No.1820 of 2024 DISPOSING OF THE CIVIL REVISION F' =TITION l <k oU \i \o *