CC/452/2024 of P. Shiva Kumar Vs Sri.R.Tirupati on 2 March 2026

1. P. Shiva Kumar, S/o. Balaiah, Aged about 36 Years, Occ- Junior Assistant' Rl/o. H. No. 1-71-390, Sathya Seetha Village Lakshmi Nagar Colony, Road No. 2, Saidabad, Hyderabad.

2. G.Pushpalatha, Wo. Y.V.Krishna Mohan, Aged about 45 years' Occ- Junior Assistant,. Rl/o. H.No.11-11-2011, lndira Nagar, R.K.Puram, Kothapet, Hyderabad -500035.

3. Smt. N. Sharada, W/o. Sunil Kumar, Aged about 44 Years, Occ- Junior Assistant, Rl/o. Plot No. 150A, H. No. 5-1-59, Road No. 5, Veeranjaneyulu Colony, Sahab Nagar, Vanasthalipuram, Hayathnagar, Ranga Reddy District.

4. P. Jyothi, Late S/o P. Shankar, Aged about 37 Years, Occ- Junior Assistant R/o. H. No- 17-1-391/60/NSW77, New Subrahmanya Nagar, Saidabad Colony, Hyderabad.

5. Smt. K. Sheela, W/o. M. Ram Mohan, Aged about 43 Years, Occ- Junior Assistant, FUo. '167lA, Hill Colony, Vanasthalipuram, Ranga Reddy District.

6. V. Rajesh Lingam, S/o. Late V. Venkat Shetty, Aged about 36 Years, Occ- Junior Assistant, R/o. H. No. 18-7-466/2/b/64, Ambika Nagar, Uppuguda' Hyderabad.

7. S.Veena, D/o. Ramakrishna Rao, Aged about 45 years, Occ' Junior Assistant, R/o. MC€7, Govt. Quarters, Malakpet, Hyderabad

8. M. Anuradha, W/o. Ravi Kumar, Aged about 43 Years' Occ- Junior Assistant. R/o. H.No.C-77, Phase-1, Opp- State Bank, Vanasthalipuram, Hyderabad.

9. P.Sandeep Kumar, S/ o. Late Manaiah. Aged about 36 years, Occ' Junior Assistant. Ri/o. H.No.2-32, Nallagandla Village, Serilingampally Mandal, Ranga Reddy District. n

10. Smt. G. Jhansi, Wo. G.V. Mallikarjuna Rao, Aged about 36 Years, Occ- Junior l\ssistant, Rl/ o. Plot No. 1 7, Plot No. 202, Ramakrishna Nagar. Madinaguda, Miyapur, Hyderabad.

11. K. Suman, S/o. K. Balram, Aged about 34 Years, Occ- Junior Assistant Rl/o. H. No. 14-2416411716, Flat No.17la Sri Krishnadevarayala Colony, Beeraml;uda, Ameenpur, Sangareddy District. l2.B.Raghavendra Reddy, S/o. Jogi Reddy, Aged about 49 years, Occ- Junior Assistant, Rl/o. plot No.218/A, R.No.S, Green Park Colony, Hyderabad.

13. B.Venkat Ramana Reddy, S/o. B.Thirumal Reddy. Aged about 37 years, Occ- Junior Assistant, R/o. Kurmidda Village, Yacharam Mandal, Ranga Reddy. ETIT'

1. Sri.R.Tirrpati, Principal Secretary to Law Department. Secretariat, Hyderabad.

2. S.Govenlhan Reddy, Registrar General, High Court of Telangana at Hyderabad.

3. A.Karna Kumar, Prl. District and Sessions Judge, Ranga Reddy at L.B.Nagar. (R2 and R3 names substituted as per the Court Order dtd.07.08.2025 in lA No.l ,ct 2025 in CC No.452 of 20241.

Petition under Section 151 of CPC praying that in the circumstances stated in the affidavit filed in support of the petition, the High Court may be pleased to direct the 2nd respondenl to consider the case of the writ petitioners (mentioned in Annexure- A) for posting the writ petitioners in the existing vacancies notified by Honble High Court vide Notification No.1/2026, ?J2026, 312026 and 9/2026 dated 1910112026 al near places around Hyderabad, Ranga Reddy and Mechal-Malkajgiri District. Contempt Case under Section 10 to 12 of Contempt of Courts Act, 1971 to punish the Res;:ondents herein for willful and deliberate disobedience of the orders of this Court daled 1 2.06.2023 passed in WP. No.24506 of 20 1 9.

1. Ganta Sudhakar Rao, S/o. G. Krishna Rao, (Jr.Assistant) Age.44 Years, Occ. Nil Fi/o. 3-6-855/1, Dattanagar, Narayanaguda, Hyderabad-29. (Petitioner No.1 in \n/P)

2. G. Krishrraveni, D/o.G.Kumara Swamy, (Jr.Assistant) Age.31 Years, Occ. Nil, R/o. H.NO.1-1-7251812, Near Canara Bank, Gandhi Nagar, Hyderabad-8O. (Petitioner No.4 in WP) n

3. P. Shailaja, Wo.B. Dattaiah, (Jr.Assistant) Age. 36 Years, Occ. NIL' R/ o' H.No.SRT-10, Jawahar Nagar, Chikkadpally, Hyderabad-20. (Petitioner No'S inWP).

4. N. Ram, S/o. Teju Singh, (Typist) Age. About 29 Years, Occ. NIL' R/o' H.No.8-4-325/11, Prem Nagar, Erragadda, Hyderabad-18. ' Presently Residing at H.No.'l-110-559, Ravi Narayana Reddy Nagar' Devender Nagar, Gajularamaram, Hyd. -500055. (Petitioner No'57 in WP).

5. V. Swathi, D/o. V. Jaganmohan Rao, (Jr.Assistant) Age. 31 Years, Occ. NIL' R/o. H.NO.3-79121a, Plol NO.324, Road NO.1' Adithyanagar Colony, Gurramguda, Hyderabad. (petitioner No.65 in WP). -

6. Jyothi Lakshmi, Wo. D. Krishna Rao, (Jr.Assistant) Age. 42 Years, Occ' iontract Employee, R/o.9-1-333/2/1/A/3, Bapu Ghat' Langer House, Hyderabad-O8 (Petitioner NO.69 in WP).

7. M. Rani, D/o. M. Sri Ramulu, (Jr.Assistant) Age. 31 Years, Occ. NIL' R/o'18- 7-614116, Hanuman Nagar Uppuguda, Hyderabad-S3. (petitioner NO'73 in wP).

8. M. Mamatha, D/o. M. Venkatesh, (Jr.Assistant) Age. 33 Years, Occ' NIL R/ o' H. NO.18- 5-682 / 1, Laldarwaj a, Mekalabanda, Hyderabad' (Petitioner NO.76 in WP)

9. Fathima Begum, Wo. Shakir, (Jr.Assistant) Age.38 Years, Occ' NIL' Rl/ o' H' N0.12 -1-11i9/15, North Lalaguda, Secunderabad. (Petitioner NO.82 in WP) l0.Nandamuri Niharika, D/o.N. Krishna, (Jr.Assistant) Age. 30 Years, Occ' NIL R/o. SRT-70, Javahar Nagar, Chikkadpally' Hyderabad. (Petitioner No'87 in WP)

11.8. Anusha, D/o. B. Narsing Rao, (Jr.Assistant) Age. 27 Years, Occ' NIL' FUo' H.NO.1S-7-725, Gowlipura, Ramchandraiah Temple' Charminar, Fa laknuma, Hyderabad-S3. (Petitioner NO.97 in WP)

12. K. Sridevi, D/o. K. Rama Krishna Rao' (Jr.Assistant) Age.31 Years, Occ' NlL, Rl/o. H.NO.Flat No.108B Block, Varun Enclave, Bhavani Nagar, Kapra, ECIL-

62. (Petitioner No.98 in WP)

13. K. Sujatha, D/o. Late R. Shankar, (Jr.Assistant) Age. 46 Years, Occ' NIL' R/o' H.NO.8-3-228/678I1437, Sriram Nagar, Yousufguda, Hyderabad' (Petitioner NO.101 inWP)

14. M. Preethi, D/o. M. Jagadeesh, (Jr. Assistant) Age. 29 Years, Occ' NIL R'/o' H.NO.18/8/440/4, Lalithl Bagh, Uppuguda, Hyderabad. (Petitioner NO'102 in WP)

15. G.Sreedvei, D/o.G. Rama Rao, (Jr.Assistant) Age. 40 Years, Occ' NlL, H.NO.23- .5-247 , Laldewaza, Hyderabad. (Petitioner No.105 in WP)

16.5. Nagaraju Yadav, S/o. S. Yadaiah Yadav, (Jr.Assistant) Age. 33 Years' Occ. tttt-, Fl/o. H.N0.13-6448123, Sri Sai Nagar Colony' Gudimalkapur, Hyderabad-28. (Petitioner No.109 in WP) ...Petitioners AND

1. Sri.R.Tirupati, Principal Secretary to Law Department, Secretariat, Hyderabad.

2. S.Gove'dhan Reddy, Registrar General, High Court of Telangana at Hyderabad.

3. Sura Srinivas Reddy, Registrar Administration, FAC Registrar Recruitment, High C,:urt for the State of Telangana, Hyderabad. (R2 and R3 names substituted as per the Court Order d1d.07.08.2025 in lA No.1 of 2025 in CC No.109!) ot 20241. ... Respondents l.A NO: 1OF 2026 Petition uncler Section 151 of CPC praying that in the circumstances stated in the affidavit filed in support of the petition, the High Court may be pleased to direct the 2nd respondent to consider the case of the writ petitioners (mentircned in Annexure- A) for posting the writ petitioners in the existing vacancies notified by Honble High Court vide Notification No.1/2026, U2026, 312O26 and 9/2026 dated '1910112026 at nmr places anrund Hyderabad, Ranga Reddy and Mechal-Malkajgiri Districts. Counsel for the Petitioners in both GCs : Sri Manohar Reddy representing Sri S V Ramana Counsel forthe Respondent Nos.2 & 3 in both CCs : Sri G Vidya Sagar representing Sri Manoj Reddy Keshi Reddy The Court made the following: COftiMON ORDER

F IN THE HIGH COURT FOR THE STATE OF TELANGANA AT HYDERABAD THE HONOURABLB SRI JUSTICE P.SAM KOSHY AND THE HONOURABLE SRI JUSTICE"NAGESH BHBEMAPAKA Dated: 02.03.2026 C.C.No.452 of 2024: Between: P.Shiva Kumar & others AND Petitioners Respondents Mr.R.Tirupati, Prl.Secretary to Law Department, Secretariat, Hyderabad & others. COMMON ORDBR: (per Hon'ble SriJustice P.Sam Koshv) Heard Mr.Manohar Reddy, learned counsel representing Mr.S.V.Ramana, learned counsel for the petitioners and Mr.G.Vidya Sagar, learned senior counsel representing Mr.Manoj Reddy Keshi Reddy, learned counsel for the respondent. Perused the record.

2. Today when the matters are taken up for hearing, the respondents have produced a sealed cover showing compliance of the ordr:rs passed by the writ Court. The orders so far as regulari::ing the respective petitioners in these contempt cases are not in dispute. Learned counsel for the petitioners also accept the fact that the orders passed by the writ Court has been now complierl with and order of regularization has been issued.

3. tn view of the same, we are of the considered opinion that nothing further survives for the Contempt Court to proceed funher vrith the Contempt Case.

4. Further at this juncture, learned counsel for the petitioners submits that in the course of complying with the order of regularization, many of the petitioners particularly females have got their order of regularization at far of district places away from tht:ir earlier place of posting where they were working before regularization. This is causing some inconvenience both at the domestic front and also so far as travelling to the far of place leaving the family is concerned. It was also the contention of the learned c'ounsel that even after order of regularization having been passed, there are few candidates who have not joined for various

\ reasons and those places are lying vacant and therefore it was a request made for the respondents to try to accommodate these peoples who have been sent to far of place to be accommodated against these vacant posts in the nearby locations."

5. Learned senior counsel for the respondents however subrnits that this exercise is the one which needs to be done on the administrative side and which could definitely be outside the contempt jurisdiction. Nonetheless, he assures that if at all if the petitioners who have any individual grievances makes a representation in this regard, the respondent authorities shall make all endeavors in trying to redress their grievances particularly trying to fill up those posts which are lying vacant on account of the non-joining of the candidates pursuant to the order of regularization being passed.

6. Given the said submission by the learned counsel for the respondents, we expect that upon a representation being made by any individual petitioners, the respondents may consider the same sympathetically to the extent possible \ \

To,

7. Accordingly, these contempt cases stands disposed of and closed at this juncture. Consequently, miscellaneous petitions pending, if any, shall stand closed. NAYANI CHANDRA SEKHAR RAO, DEPUTY REGISTRAR //TRUE COPY// OFFICER

1. Sri.R.Tirupati, Principal Hyderabad. Secretary to Law Department. Secretariat, 2- s.Goverdhan Reddy, Registrar General, High court of relangana at Hyderatrad

3. sri siura srinivas Reddy, Registrar (Administration) FAc Registrar(Recruitment), High court of relangana at Hyderabad

4. sri A.Kema Kumar, prr. District and sessions Judge, Ranga Reddy at L.B.Nagar

5. One CC to Sri S V Ramana, Advocate [OpUCl

6. one cc to sri Manoj Reddy Keshi Reddy, Advocate topucl

7. Two CD Copies ADK n- I I ! I I i I I i I I I i I I I i, i I I I I !

, / HIGH COURT DATED: AU0312026

COMMON ORDER

2 6 iij,fi ?ffifi CC.Nos.452 and 10gg of 2024

* J};}s 6- _) * BOTH THE CONTEMPT CASES STANDS DISPOSED OF AND CLOSED AT THIS JUNCTURE J ; 4a &.

-: i:_' *:-.- i- '1.:,i.t :: t. .t l. t