CRP/3666/2025 of Syed Afsar Ahmed Vs Greater Hyderabad Municipal Corporation on 27 February 2026

IN THE HIGH COURT FOR iHE STATE OF TELANGANA

AT HYDERABAD

FRIDAY, THE TWENTY SEVENTH DAY OF FEBRUARY

TWO THOUSAND AND TWENTY SIX

PRESENT

THE HONOURABLE SRI JUSTICE P.SAM KOSHY

NO:

Petition under Article 227 of the Constitution of lndia, aggrieved by the orders dated 2510712025 passed in l.A No. 606 of 2024 in M.A 62 of 2024 on the file of the court of the Chief Judge Small Causes Court, City Civil Court, Hyderabad.

Between:

syed Afsar Ahmed, s/o, syed sayeed Ahmed, Aged about 63 years, occ. Retd Bank Employee, R/o. 10-2-497, Anjuman, Asif Nagar, Hyderabad.

Petitioner

AND

1. Greater Hyderabad Municipal Corporation, Rep by its Commissioner, Lower Tankbund, Hyderabad.

2. The Deputy Commissioner, Circle No. 12, Mehdipatnam, Khairatabad Zone, GHMC Hyderabad.

The

City Planner, Circle No. 12, Mehdipatnam, Khairatabad Zone, GH

Hyderabad

Khan, S/o Late Shareef Khan, aged about 43 years, Occ. Secretary, Rlo. H No. 10-2463, Anjuman, Asif Nagar, Hyderabad

...Respondents

t.A.

Petition

Section 151 CPC praying that in the circumstances stated in the affidavit filed support of the petition, the High Court may be pleased to stay all ings in M.A 62 of 2024 on the file of the Chief Judge Small Causes further Court, City Court, Hyderabad, pending the disposal of the Civil Revision Petition, in interest of Justice and circumstances of the case.

Counsel for

Petitioner : Sri. V V L Sujatha

counsel for the Respondent Nos. 1,2 & 3 : Mr. M. Arun Kumar standing Counsel for GHMC

Counsel for the Respondent No.4 : Ms. K. Raiitha representing Mr. R. Chandrashekar Reddy The Gourt made the following: ORDER

IN THE ITIGI{ COURT FOR THE STATE OF TELANGANA AT

HYDERABAD

THB HONOURABLE SRI JUSTICE P.SAM KOSHY

Civil Revision Petition No.3666 of 2025

Date:27.02.2026

Between:

Syed Afsa: Ahmed

AND

Greater H),derabad Municipal Corporation Rep. by its Cornrnissioner, Lower Tank Bund, Hyderabac ancl others.

...Respondents

ORDER'. (pu Ilon'ble SriJusrice P.Sum Koshv)

The present Civil Revision Petition seems to have been frled only on aggrieved passing of observation of Chief Judge, City Small Causes Court in paragraph No.8 so far as there is an observation of the Court to the order passed by the GHMC dated 12.06.202:; so lbr as demolishing the unauthorized structure under Clause (10) of 654 of GHMC Act is concerned.

2. Heard Ms.V.V.t-.Sujatha, learned counsel fbr the petitioner; Mr.M.Arun Kumar, learned standing counsel for respondent Nos.l, 2 and 3 and Ms.K.Rajitha, learned counsel

...Petitioner

representing Mr.R.Chandrashekar Reddy, learned counsel for respondent No.4. Perused the record

3. On a perusal of the order dated 12.06.2023, there does not seem to be any direction for demolition of sttucture, the obseruation was so far as sealing of the said premises which is said to have been unauthorizedly constructed.

4. Given the submission made by learned counsel on all the sides, this Court is of the considered opinion that since M.A.No.62

of 2024 is seized to be decided by the City Srnall Causes Coutt, we do not want to come in the way of City Srnall Causes Court in deciding the M.A. It is made clear that City Small Causes Court rnay decide the M.A. on its own merits and in accordance to law without being intluenced by any observations made in paragraph No.8 in the order dated 25.07.2025 in t.A.No.606 of 2024 in M.A.No.62 of 2024.

5. With the aforesaid obseruations, this Civil Revision I

Petition is disposed of.

3,

Consequently, miscellaneous petitions pending, if any, shall stanrl closed.

SD/. N.CHAN DRA SEKHAR RAO

DE

REGISTRAR

//TRUE COPY//

ON OF FICER

I

J

To,

5. Two CD CrPies

DL/PSL

l.TheChief.JudgeSmallCausesCourt'CityCivilCourt,Hyderabad.

2' one CC to SrilV v L Sujatha, Advocate [OPUC] -

3. One CC to Mr. M. Arun Kumar Standing bounselfor GHMC IOPUC]

4. One CC to Mr. R- Chandrashekar Reddy' Advocate [OPUC]

HIGH COURT

DATED: 2710212026