Telangana High Court
WP/2703/2026 of Sri Rohit Joshi Vs The Union of India on 26 February 2026
IN THE HIGH COURT FOR THE STATE OF TELANGANA AT HYDERABAD (Special Original Jurisdiction) THURSDAY, THE TWENTY SIXTH DAY OF FEBRUARY TWO THOUSAND AND TWENTY SIX PRESENT THE HONOURABLE SRI JUSTICE NAGESH BHEEMAPAKA WRIT PETITION NO: 2703 OF 2026 Between: 1. Sri Rohit Joshi, S/o. Late. Shri Krishna
[ 3300 I
IN THE HIGH COURT FOR THE STATE OF TELANGANA
AT HYDERABAD
(Special Original Jurisdiction)
THURSDAY, THE TWENTY SIXTH DAY OF FEBRUARY
TWO THOUSAND AND TWENTY SIX
PRESENT
THE HONOURABLE SRI JUSTICE NAGESH BHEEMAPAKA
WRIT PETITION NO: 2703 OF 2026
Between:
1. Sri Rohit Joshi, S/o. Late. Shri Krishna Joshi, Aged about 41 years, Occ. lT
Service, Rl/o. H.No. C-3 C-1 1, SBH/Krishnapuri Colony, West Marredpaliy, Near Ghanshyam Super Market, Secunderabad, T.S,
2. Sri Ashwin Joshi, S/o. Late. Shri Krishna Joshi, Aged about 35 years, Occ.
Pvt. Employee, Rio. H.No. C-3 C-1 1, SBH/Krishnapuri Colony, West Manedpally, Near Ghanshyam Super lr/arket, Secunderabad, T.S.
, ..PETITIONERS
AND
1. The Union of lndia, Rep. by its Principal Secretary, Ministry of Defense, New Delhi, lndia.
2. The Cantonment Board, Rep. by its Chief Executive Officer, At Cantonment, Secunderabad.
3. The Tax Collection Officer, Cantonment Board, At Cantonment, Secunderabad.
...RESPONDENTS
Petition under Article 226 of the Constitution of lndia praying that in the circumstances stated in the affidavit filed therewith, the High Court may be pleased to issue a Writ, Order or Orders one in the nature of WRIT OF MANDAMUS
declaring the action of the respondent Nos.2 and 3 for not considering the representation made by the petitioner dated. 1210112026 requesting the respondent authorities to Mutate their names in records in respect of the property i.e., House on part of the Plot No.C-3(RE-1 1) PTIN No.PT04F'15420419) Unique Property lD
No.PT-CB-SECU-2021-O7-19-192249, S.C.B. No.4-12-052/3, consisting of Ground +
1st floor forming part of Sy.No.21, admeasuring 106 sq. yards in the layout of State Bank of Hyderabad Staff Co-operativei Housing Society, r tuated at State Bank Colony, West Marredpally, Secunderabad Cantonment Hyderabad District, Telangana State in pursuance of the registered settlement c -.ed dated. 0711112025
and to Declare the action of the respondents are totally ille!E , arbilrary, against the principles of natural justice and against the provisions of tht: lantonment Act 2006, and against the Article 300 of the constitution of lndia.
l.A. NO: 'l OF 2026
Petition under Section 151 CPC praying that in the circ.] nstances stated in the affidavit filed in support of the petition, the High Court may : r pleased to direct the respondents 2 and 3 to consider and dispose off the repr(x entation made by the petitioner on dated. 1210112026 in respect of the property i.tr. House on part of the Plot No.C-3(RE-1 1) PTIN No.PT04F15420419) Unique Fr )perty lD No PT-CB- SECU-2021-07-19-192249, S.C.B. No.4-12-052/3, consistin<y of Ground + 1st floor forming part of Sy.No.21, admeasuring 106 sq. yards in the li yout of State Bank of Hyderabad Staff Co-operative Housing Society, situated at S. te Bank Colony, West Marredpally, Secunderabad Cantonment, Hyderabad Distri ) Telangana State in pursuance of the registered settlement deed dated. 07111'', O25 by mutating the names of the petitioner in records, pending disposal of the all() e writ petition.
Counsel for the Petitioner: SRI SURESH SHIV SAGAR
Gounsel for the Respondents: SRI N.BHUJANGA RAO, DEPUW SOLICITOR GENt:l IAL OF INDIA
The Court made the following: ORDER
IN THE I{IGH COURT FOR THE STATE OF TELANGANA
AT HYDERABAD
THE HONOURABLE SRI JUSTICE NAGESH BHEEMAPAKA
UIRIT PETITION No.27O3 of 2o26
Date:26.02.2026
Between:
Sri Rohit Joshi and another
. . . Petitioners
AND
The Union of India,
Represented by its Principal Secretary
Ministry of Defense,
New Delhi, India & 2 others
... Respondents
Citations and Judicial Treatment
Cited by
0
Decisions in the index citing it
Cites
0
Decisions referred to
In this index
0
Of the decisions it cites
Overruled / Questioned
0
No negative treatment found
Loading the citing and cited decisions…
This judgment in the centre: on the left the decisions it cites, on the right the decisions citing it. Colour is the treatment; choose a decision to open it.
ORDER
Today, when this matter is taken up for hearing, the learned counsel for the petitioners seeks permission of this Court to withdraw this writ petition.
2. Permission is accorded.
3. Accordingly, this writ petition is dismissed as withdrawn. No order as to costs. Miscellaneous petitions, if any, pending in this Writ Petition, shall stand closed. Sd/.S.MALLIKARJU NA RAO AS TANT REGISTRAR //TRUE COPY// ECTION OFFICER To, 'l . One CC to SRI SURESH SH|V SAGAR, Advocate [OpUC] 2, One CC to SRI N.BHUJANGA RAO, DEPUTY SoLICIToR GENERAL oF lNDlA, High Court for the State of Telangana at Hyderabad [OpUC]
3. Two CD Copies BSR PMK (\ tu,
HIGH COURT DATED: 2610212026
ORDER
WP.No.2703 of 2026 oo DISMISSING THE WRIT PETITION AS WITHDRAWN, WITHOUT COSTS KJ slzl>t. O(-
* 1)- rES 'r r it Jtlfr zg * lP'*