Telangana High Court
WP/5823/2026 of Mohammed Ghouse Khan Vs The High Court of Telangana on 26 February 2026
COURT FOR THE STATE OF TELANGANA AT HYDERABAD (Special Original Jurisdiction) THURSDAY, THE TWENTY SIXTH DAY OF FEBRUARY TWO THOUSAND AND TWENTY SIX PRESENT THE HONOURABLE SRI JUSTICE P.SAM KOSHY AND THE HONOURABLE SRI JUSTICE NARSING RAO NANDIKONDA WRIT PETITION NO: sa230F 2026 Between: AND A
134471
IN THE HIGH COURT FOR THE STATE OF TELANGANA
AT HYDERABAD
(Special Original Jurisdiction)
THURSDAY, THE TWENTY SIXTH DAY OF FEBRUARY
TWO THOUSAND AND TWENTY SIX
PRESENT
THE HONOURABLE SRI JUSTICE P.SAM KOSHY
AND
THE HONOURABLE SRI JUSTICE NARSING RAO NANDIKONDA
WRIT PETITION NO: sa230F 2026
Between:
AND
A/lohammed Ghouse Khan. S/o. Khala Moinuddin Khan. Aged about 44 years, Occ. Agriculture, R/o. 18-2-614, Falaknuma, Hyderabad.
...PETITIONER
'l . The High Court of Telangana, Rep by Registrar General At High Court Buildings, High Court at Hyderabad.
2. The High Court of Telangana, Rep by Registrar Vigilance At High Court Buildings, High Court at Hyderabad
3. The District and Session Judge, Kamareddy District.
4. The Superintendent, Court of Judicial First Class Magistrate Kamareddy at Kamareddy District
5. The Director General of Police Telangana State, office at LakdikaPul Hyderabad
6. The Superintendent of Police, Kamareddy District at Kamareddy
7. The Station House Officer, Devenpally Police Station Kamareddy District.
8. Smt. Jyothi Gurijala, w/o not known to petitioner aged Major, Occ. Sub lnspector of Police Devenpally Police Station, KamareddyDistrict
9. Sri Vemulapally Gopi Chand, s/o Subash aged about 42 years, Occ.
Business, rto 1-4-1122, LRS Nagar, Bodhan Town and Mandal, Nizamabad District.
As per Court Order dt. 18.02.2026 deleting the Respondent Nos.2, 5, 6, 7, 8&9
...RESPONDENTS
Petition under Article 226 of the Constitution of lndia praying that in the circumstances; stated in the affidavit filed therewith, the High Court may be pleased to issue an a[)propriate writ, order or direction more particularly one in the nature of WRIT OF t\xANDAMUS Directing the 4th respondent to issue certified copies of the FlR, Complaint, 161 statements, final report, Re-open Petition and order in Crime No 101 of 2021 <>n the file of Judicial First Class lVagistrate Kamareddy as per the Application CFR No 2282 of 2025 dated 6-11 -2025
l.A. NO:
oF 2026
Petition under Section 151 CPC praying that in the circumstances stated in the affidavit filed irr support of the petition, the High Court may be pleased to issue certified copies of the FlR, Complaint, 161 statements, final report, Reopen petition and order in Crime No 101 of 2021 on the file of Judicial First Class tMagistrate Kamareddy as 3er the Application CFR No 2282 of 2025 dated 6-11-2025, pending disposal of the rvrit ltetition.
Counsel for ther Petitioner: SRI M.MEHDI HUSSAIN
Counsel for the Respondents: Gp FOR HOME
The Court made the following: ORDER
To,
BSR
BS
IN THE HIGH COURT FOR THE STATE OF TELANGANA
AT HYDERABAD
THE HONOURABLE SRI JUSTICE P.SAM KOSHY
AND
THE HONOURABLE SRI JUSTTCE NARSING RAO
NANDIKONDA
Wrif Pefitio n No.5823 of 2026
Dated: 26.02.2026
Ilctr,r,een:
Molrd.Ghouse Khan
.. Petitioner
AND
.l'he High Cout of 'I'elangana
Rcp b,r' lte_rristrar (iencral,
At t tigh Court Buildings.
lligh Court at l{yderabad & orhcrs.
ltcsponclents
ORDER, (pcr Hon'hla.SriJusticc P.Sam Koshy)
When lhe matter is taken up for hearin-{. learned courrscl fbr the petitioner submits that the cause in the u,rit pctition does nol surr ir,c firr adjudication and the same has becomc infructuous.
2. Recording the said submission, this rvrit perition stands dismissed as havin-e become inliuctuous.
Consoquentlv, miscellaneous petitions pending, il' any, shall stand closed. Therc shall be no order as to costs.
SD/.C. DEEPIKA
TANT REG
//TRUE COPY//
OFFICER
1. One CC to SRI tVl.tVlEHDl HUSSAIN, Advocate [OPUC
2. Two CCs to GP FOR HOME, High Court for the State of Telangana at Hyderabad [OUT]
3. Two CD Copies
er
HIGH COURT
DATED i 2610212026
Citations and Judicial Treatment
Cited by
0
Decisions in the index citing it
Cites
0
Decisions referred to
In this index
0
Of the decisions it cites
Overruled / Questioned
0
No negative treatment found
Loading the citing and cited decisions…
This judgment in the centre: on the left the decisions it cites, on the right the decisions citing it. Colour is the treatment; choose a decision to open it.
ORDER
WP.No.5823 of 2026 DISMISSING THE WRIT PETITION AS INFRLICTUOUS, WITHOUTCOSTS ,{s6 5TA $ i1Afl ?[?6 z
6) PrI * ,6"'t #6 .+