Telangana High Court
WP/12473/2009 of M/S. DLF COMMERCIAL DEVELOPERS LTD. HYD. Vs AUTHORITY FOR CLARIFICATION, C.T. DEPT. HYD AND 4 OTHERS on 23 February 2026
COURT FOR THE STATE OF TELANGANA AT HYDERABAD (Special Original Jurisdiction) MONDAY, THE TWENTY THIRD DAY OF FEBRUARY TWO THOUSAND AND TWENW SIX PRESENT THE HONOURABLE SRIJUST]CE P.SAM KOSHY AND THE HONOURABLE SRIJUSTICE NARSING RAO NANOIKONDA WRIT PETITION NO: 12473 0F 2009 Between: M/s. DLF
134471
IN THE HIGH COURT FOR THE STATE OF TELANGANA
AT HYDERABAD
(Special Original Jurisdiction)
MONDAY, THE TWENTY THIRD DAY OF FEBRUARY
TWO THOUSAND AND TWENW SIX
PRESENT
THE HONOURABLE SRIJUST]CE P.SAM KOSHY
AND
THE HONOURABLE SRIJUSTICE NARSING RAO NANOIKONDA
WRIT PETITION NO: 12473 0F 2009
Between:
M/s. DLF Commercial Developers Ltd. Sy.No.129 C part, 130' .191 and 132
CaCniUowti Village, Serilingampalty Mandal,-Hyderabad, represented by Mr'Dodla Srinivasulu, Deputy Manager - lndirect Taxation.
.....PETITIONER
AND
'I . Authority For Clarification and Advance Ruling, Comnrercial Taxes Department, Government of Andhra Pradesh, Hyderabad.
2. Commercial Tax Officer, Madhapur Circle.
3. Deputy Commissioner (CT), Hyderabad Rural Division, Hyderabad'
4. Commissioner of Commercial Taxes, Hyderabad, Andhra Pradesh'
5. Government of Andhra Pradesh, Through, Principal Secretary to Government, Revenue DePartment, HYderabad- ,....RESPONDENTS
Petition under Article 226 of the constitution of lndia praying that in the circumstances stated in the affidavit filed therewith, the High court may be pleased to issue a writ, order or direction particularly one in the nature of a writ of Certiorari quashing the Order No.A.R Com/8/2008 dated 26.5.2009 issued by the respondent No.'1 as illegal, arbitrary, contrary to law laid down by Hon'ble supreme court, without iurisdiction and violative of Article 14 of the constitution of lndia and declaring that Section 22(3\ read with Rule 18 of the Andhra Pradesh Value Added Tax Rules, 2005 is not applicable to sales made to SEZ
/
units/developers alternatively, declare that section 22(3) of the Andhra pradesh Value Added rax Act, 2005 along with Rule 18 of the Andhra pradesh Value Added rax Rules, 2005 are ultra vires as being arbitrary and violative of articles 14 and 19(1)(g) of the Constitution of tndia.
l.A.NO:1 OF 2009 (WPMP.NO :16120 OF 20091
Petition Under section 151 cpc praying that in the circumstances stated in the affidavit filed in support of the petition, the High court may be pleased to direct the Respondent No.3 not to take any coercive steps.
l.A.NO:2 OF 2009 (WPMP.NO :16121 OF 2009)
Petition Under section 15i cpc praying that in the circumstances stated in the affidavit filed in support of the petition, the High court may be pleased to stay the operation of the impugned order No.A.R.com/g/200g dated 26.s.2oog passed by the Respondent No.1.
counsel for the Petitioner : Ms. sAAcHl AWATE, couNsEL REPRESENTING
M/s LAKSHMI KUMARAN & SRTDHARAN
Counsel for the Respondents : Gp FOR COMMERCTAL TAX
The Court made the following ORDER
7.
\
IN THE HIGH COURT FOR THE STATE OF TELANGANA
AT HYDBRABAD
THE HONOURABLE SRIJUSTICE P.SAM KOSHY
AND
THE HONOURABLE SRI JUSTICE NARSING RAO
NANDIKONDA
W.P.No.l2473 OF 2009
23-02.2026
Between:
M/s DLF Commercial Developers Ltd.
. . . Petitioner
AND
Authority for Clarification and Advance Ruling Commercial Taxes Department, Government of Andhra Pradesh, Hyderabad and 4 others
..Respondents
$,DEB, (per Hon'blc Sri .lustitt P Sum Ko.shl')
Ms. Saachi Awatc, lt:arned counsel representing NOs Lakshrni Kumaran & Sridhararr, leamed counsel for the petitioner, prays for withdras'al of the writ petition.
2.
As prayed for, the writ petition stands dismissed as withdrawn. There shall be no order as to costs.
t
.J
2
Consequently, miscellaneous petitions pending, if any, shall stand c losed.
I
i
\
//TRUE COPY//
SD/-A.H.S. GOWRI SHANKAR
AS
TANT REGISTRAR
ECTION OFFICER
To
1. Two CCs to GP FOR COMMERCIAL TAX, Hiqh Courr ior the Srate of Telangana at Hyderabad. [OUT]
2 One CC to SRI LAKSHMI KUMARAN & SRTDHARAN, Advocate tOpUCl 3 Two CD Copies SA
BS
o
It
HIGH COURT
DATED: 2 310212026
I
toB IH-r Slll
:\
2 3 l,1IB 2!2i
(_
.)'
l()
r9.
'),
Citations and Judicial Treatment
Cited by
0
Decisions in the index citing it
Cites
0
Decisions referred to
In this index
0
Of the decisions it cites
Overruled / Questioned
0
No negative treatment found
Loading the citing and cited decisions…
This judgment in the centre: on the left the decisions it cites, on the right the decisions citing it. Colour is the treatment; choose a decision to open it.
ORDER
WP.No.12473 ot 2009 DISMISSING THE W.P AS WITHDRAWN WITHOUT COSTS. .l * il I snn Oa