Telangana High Court
WP/4147/2026 of Kalluru Kiran Kumar Vs The Registrar General on 20 February 2026
HIGH COURT FOR THE STATE OF TELANGANA AT HYDERABAD (Special Original Jurisdiction) FRIDAY, THE TWENTIETH DAY OF FEBRUARY TWO THOUSAND AND TWENry SIX PRESENT THE HONOURABLE SRI JUSTICE P. SAM KOSHY AND THE HONOURABLE SRIJUSTICE NARSING RAO NANDIKONDA WRIT PETITION NO:4147 OF 2026 Between: Kalluru
13447 |
IN THE HIGH COURT FOR THE STATE OF TELANGANA
AT HYDERABAD
(Special Original Jurisdiction)
FRIDAY, THE TWENTIETH DAY OF FEBRUARY
TWO THOUSAND AND TWENry SIX
PRESENT
THE HONOURABLE SRI JUSTICE P. SAM KOSHY
AND
THE HONOURABLE SRIJUSTICE NARSING RAO NANDIKONDA
WRIT PETITION NO:4147 OF 2026
Between:
Kalluru Kiran Kumar, S/o. Kalluru Subrahmanyam, Age: 38 Years, Occ: Pvt.
Service, R/o. Flat No. 404, Praneetha Reddy Apartments.Radhunadh Colony, SW Nagar Tirupati.
...PETITIONER
AND
1. The Registrar General, High Court for the State of Telangana
2. The Registrar (lT)-CUM-Central Project Coordinator, High Court for the State of Telangana.
...RESPONDENTS
Petition under Article 226 of the Constitution of lndia praying that in the circumstances stated in the affidavit filed therewith, the High Court may be pleased to issue a writ or order or direction, mote in the nature of a Writ of Mandamus, declaring the action of the respondents in not removing the name of the petitioner from the e-courts portal maintained by the Respondent No.2 as unconstitutional, unlawful and violative of Article 21 of the constitution of lndia and consequently direct the respondents not to reflect the petitioner name in relation to CC.No.256/2016 and CC.No.78/2016 on the file of Honourable XIX
Special Magistrate, Erramanzil, Hyderabad and Honourable ll Special Magistrate, Erramanzil, Hyderabad respectively in any manner on the e-courts portal.
lA NO: 1 OF 2026
Petition under Section '151 CPC praying that in the circumstances stated in the affidavit filed in support of the petition, the High Court may be pleased please be to direct the respondents herein to forthwith remove/delete the petitioner's name from the e-courts portal and mask the name of the petitioner in its digital reccrds pertaining to cc.No.256/20't6 and cc.No.7812016 on the file of Hon'ble XIX Special Magistrate, Erramanzil, Hyderabad and ll Special Magistrate, Erramanzil, Hyderabad respectively in the interest of justice.
Counsel for the Petitioner: SRI S.M. SAIFULLAH
Counsel for the Respondents: SRI K.V. RAMAN
The Court made the following: ORDER
IN THE HIGH COURT FOR THE STATE OF TELANGANA
AT HYDERABAD
THE HONOURABLE SRI JUSTICE P.SAM KOSHY
AND
THEHONoURABLESRIJUSTICENARSINGRAo
NANDTKONDA
rit
n
4t47
Datedz 20.02.2O26
Between:
Mr.K.Kiran Kumar
...Petitioner
\
AND
The Registrar Gener{
High Court for the State of Telangana & another'
...Respondents
ORDER, (per Hon'ble Sri Justice P'Sam Koshy)
Heard Mr.S.M.Saifullah, learned counsel for the petitioner and Mr.K.V.Raman, Iearned standing counsel for respondents.
2.Today,whenthematteristakenupforhearing'learned ccunsel for the petitioner prays for withdrawal of the present writ perition.
3. As prayed for, this writ petition is dismissed as withdrawn.
\
consequentry, misceraneous petitions pending, if any, sharl stand closed. There shall be no order as to costs SD/.B. REKHA RANI
ASSISTANT REGISTNAN
//TRUE COPY//
N OFFICER
To,
; g;1rf$ ;[i{fu;fg:rn?*;rii,?e,s3
u * r.r,he s,a,e
4. One CC to SRI X.U nA'tf,fnru-,1Oro"ate [OpUCJ
5. Two CD Copies
BN
BS
Pt,,c,'
HIGH CC'URT
DATED:2010212026
Citations and Judicial Treatment
Cited by
0
Decisions in the index citing it
Cites
0
Decisions referred to
In this index
0
Of the decisions it cites
Overruled / Questioned
0
No negative treatment found
Loading the citing and cited decisions…
This judgment in the centre: on the left the decisions it cites, on the right the decisions citing it. Colour is the treatment; choose a decision to open it.
ORDER
WP.No.4147 ot 2026 DISMISSING THE WRIT PETITION AS WITHDRAWN WITHOUT COSTS 1HE o (J 13 ritAn 2026 2o * ^^* i; A- rr\zlra,