CRP/419/2026 of Smt. K. Malti Singh Vs Sant Sri Asaramji Ashram Trust Delhi on 20 February 2026

1.

4.

2.

3.

5.

6. Mrs. Juwadi Aritha, Wo. Mr. Juwadi Parveen Rao, about 44 years, R/o

7. Nukala Niteesh ReddY, Flat No.404, Sri Sai Garden, Ramanth S/o. late Sri. N apur, ukula Srinivas Reddy, , T.S. - 500013. mother and natural guard ian Smt. Kota Rama Devi Wo late rep Sri. by his Nukala Srinivas Reddy, aged about '18 years, Occ- Student, R/o. Plot No.61, Sy.

^ U.,',t',1it;U"U: g:'sP,l5gS6E a r c o ro n v' H avath n a ga r, Ra n ga R edd v U. Mr. Nukala Srinivas Reddy, Died, per LRs / R_7, 10 and .l.l

e. Mr. B. Eswar tat. sro e. #i,u-LJ: ii9qi!-"!i,ii ylil, o."_ Business, R/o. ,. fifiiilftffi,g:$i#,[1ij?jii:i!u?%;,* ***, ased 51 years occ- Horsewife, R/o. ptot No.di , Si.lfu;,E;il]irrrls.r., sriramnaoar ,,Fi[{{:,lffi {t1g:.6["3fl :-^["-:ijg,",,,ffi i*;3S:S;;.,';". ili,Xiill;,,['i;R:L]""flaii#j:%E:l?tf#I3iiii""g"ic;6nv,- lA NO: 1 OF 20.26 ...RESPONDENTS/DEFENDANTS Petition under section 151 cpc praying that in the circumstances stated in the affidavit fired in support of the petition, the High court may be preased to direct the XrV Additionar chief Judge, city civir courts at Hyderabad to dispose-of rA No'182 0f 2025 in os No.180 0f 2020 (ord os No.157 0t2014),as expeditiously as possibre in erccordance with Law, within a reasonabre time to be fixed by this Honble Court, pending disposal of CRp. C.R.P.No.421ot 2026: Petition under Nlicle 227 of the Constitution of lndia, aggrieved by the order dated 22-01-2026 against the Order made in O.S.No.1gO of 2020 (old o.s.No.157 0f 2014) dared 22.01.2026 0n the fire of the XrV Additionar chief Judge, City Civit Courts at Hyderabad. Between: , illj;5"lXi'ri sinsh, Wo. tate K. Mohan singh, aged about 63 years, Occ_ , S;,f#El* Singh, S/o. tate K. Mohan Singh, aged about 40 years, Occ_ ' [r.llT:.1t singh' s/o' late K' Mohan sinsh, ased about 37 years, occ- fllt_ are.. R/o. 4th .floor, East Btock, Hrmayathlagar, Hyderabad _ 5OOO29. AND Hari Om Towers, H.No.3_6_240, ...PETITIONERS/PLATNTIFFS

n:?i:?q1ffi,{#ili11,ryrl,leg!$?1,3;F,i,#r{rlmr gl-[.tr#iflfittr#fl[##trffi,,'#[BH[{#"

3. M/s. Lotus Gruha private Limited. reoresented by its Manaqino Director Mr. Katta Lakshmikanth S/o. Mr. Katri Seshagiri nao, naving iti dgis6rdd diii;e ! C/6, Vikrampuri Colony, Secunderabad"- 5OOO09.

4. Mr. Ala Pavan Phanindra-Rayla, S/o Mr.Ala Raman Janeyulu, aged about 21 y9a.rs, !/o, H.No.2-1-25211,-Flat No.40.t, Sharda Cute, ttew'Hittafunta, - Hyderabad, Telangana State - 500044.

5. f{rsrlttl.aVlqd-dy.Arpitha, Wo. Mr. M. Bataji, aged about46 years, R/o. Ftat No.404, Sri Sai Garden, Ramanthapur, tiyde-rabaO, feUngiani State - --

6. Mrs. Juwadi Aritha, Wo. Mr. Juwadi parveen Rao. aoed aboul44 vears. R/o _ Flat No.404, Sri Sai Garden, Ramanthapur, Hyaerabai, t.S. _-SOOO1SI -' - -

7. Nukala Niteesh Reddy, S/o. late Sri. Nuku6 S?inivas ReaOv. reo Ov tris motherand natural guardian Smt. Kota Rama Devi Wo h6 Sri. Nlkah griniyas_Rgqqy, aged.about 18 years, Occ- Student, Rt/o. ptot No.61, Sy. !9..S.2, Batgji Nagar,. Sriramnagar Cotony, Hayathnagar, Ranga Reddy' District, Telangana State -500070.

8. Mr. Nukala Srinivas Reddy, Died, per LRs / R-7, 10 and 11 S. Ur. 9. Egrgr lal, S/o B. Bibu Lat, hged about 45 years, Occ- Business, R/o. 3-5-541/3, Domatguda, Hyderabad : 50OO2g.

10. Smt. Kota Rama Devi, Wo. late Sri. Nukala Srinivas Reddv. aoed 51 vears_ Occ- Housewife, R/o. Ptot No.61, Sy. No.97, Bataii Naoar. Sririmnioii- -' 9o!o,!y, Hayathnagar, Ranga Reddy District, TS. : SOO-OZO.

11. Nukula Nihitha, D/o. late Sri. Nukal; Srinivai Reddy, aoed 22 vears. Occ_ Student, R/o. Plot No.61,.Sy. No.97, Balaji Nagar, Siird'rnnagai Cok;ny, - Hayathnagar, Ranga Reddy Dist, TS. - 5d0O7O'. rA NO: 1 OF 2026 ...RESPONDENTS/DEFENDANTS Petition under section 151 cpc praying that in the circumstances stated in the affidavit filed in support of the petition, the High court may be pleased to direct the XIV Additional chief Judge, city civil courts at Hyderabad to dispose-of the main suit in o.s.No.180 of 2020 (otd o.s.No.157 of 2014 ) by considering it as 'ldentified matter' as expeditiously as possible in accordance with law within a reasonable time to be fixed by this Hon'ble Court. C.R.P.No.424 ot 2026: Petition under Arlicle 227 of the constitution of lndia, against the order made in LA No.497 of 2025 in O.S.No.180 of ZOZO (old O.S.No.157 of 2014) dated 22.01.2026 on the file of the XtV Additionat chief Judge, city civil courts at Hyderabad. Between:

1. Smt. l.<. Malti Singh, Wo. late K. Mohan Singh, aged about 63 years, Occ_ Household,

2. K. Aranth Singh, S/o. late K. Mohan Singh, aged about 40 years, Occ_ Service,

3. K. Naresh Singh, S/o. late K. Mohan Singh, aged about 37 years, Occ_ Business, All are R/o. 4th floor, East Block, Hari Om Towers, H.No.3_6-240, Himayathnagar' Hyderabad - 500029' ...pETrrtoNERsrpLArNTrFFs

AND 1 . S_ant Sri Asaramji Ashram Trust Delhi, having its office at Vande Mataram Vgrg.9pp. Ravindra Rangshata, New Delhi-60, rep.by Sri Pankaj Kumar S/o. Sri. Kisl'anchand Mirchandani, aged about 3! ygar's, R/o. Sant Sii Asaramji Ash ram Tondpa lly Village, S ham,-sha bad, R. R.- District.

2. llsr -p_egc.g1 [nf1a Ltd. (Formerty known as ANSHU CONSTRUCTTON COMPA.NY), jointly representeri bv its Chairman Mr. B. prashanth Reddv S/o. Mr. Ranre_sh Reddy and Managingi Director Mr. B. Srikanth Reddy S/o. Mr. Ramestr Reddy, having registdreii Office at H.No.8-2-248ltu5, pt6t 33 Venkat€,swara Hills Colony, Road No.3, Banjara Hills, Hyderabad - 5OOO34.

3. M/s. Lotus Gruha Private Limited, represent;d by its Mahaging Director Mr. Katta Lakshmikanth S/o. Mr. Katta S'eshagiri Ra6, having iti r6gistered office at C/6, t/ikrampuri Colony, Secunderabad- 500009.

4. Mr. Ala Pavan Phanindra-Rayla, S/o Mr.Ala Raman Janeyulu, aged about 21 y9ap, $/o, H. No. 2-1-252t1 , Ftat No.401, Sharda Cute, New Ni'llakunta, Hyderabad, Telangana State - 500044. 5 lvtrsrlvl_ay1qdly.{rpitha, Wo. Mr. M. Bataji, aged about 46 years, R/o. Ftat N-o.191, Sri Sai Garden, Ramanthapur, Hydeiabad, Tetanjana State -

6 fulrs..fu,ry-adi Aritha, Wo. Mr. Juwadi parveen Rao, aged about44 years, R/o Flat No.404, Sri Sai Garden, Ramanthapur, Hyderabai, T.S. - SOOO1 3.

7. Nukala Niteesh Reddy, S/o. late Sri. Nukula Siinivas Reddy, rep by his mother and natural guardian Smt. Kota Rama Devi W/o lat6 Sri. Nijkala qrinivas, Reddy, aged about 18 years, Occ- Student, R/o. plot No.61, Sv. No.97, ltlaji Nagar,_ Sriramnagar Colony, Hayathnagar, Ranga Reddy - District, Telangana State -500070.

8. Mr. Nukala Srinivas Reddy, Died, per LRs / R-7, 10 and 11

9. Mr. 9. E:swar lal, S/o B. Babu Lal, -aged about 45 years, Occ- Business, R/o. 3-5-541/3, Domalguda, Hyderabad : 500029.

10. Smt. Kota Rama Devi, Wb. late Sri. Nukala Srinivas Reddv. aoed 51 vears. Occ- Housewife, R/o. Plot No.61, Sy. No.97, Balaji Nagar, Sririmnagdr Colony, Hayathnagar, Ranga Reddy District, TS. :5OO-070. 1 ,l. Nukula Nihitha, D/o. late S-ri. Nukali Srinivas Reddy, aged 22 years, Occ- Studen':, R:/o. Plot No51, Sy. No.97, Bataji Nagar, Sririmnagai Cotony, Hayath ragar, Ranga Reddy Dist, TS. - 50007d. ...RESPONDENTS/OEFENDANTS lA NO: 1 OF 2026 Petitiorr under Order 39 Rule 1 & 2 R/w Section 1Sl CpC praying that in the circumstance:; stated in the affidavit filed in support of the petition, the High Court may be pleased to grant Ad interim injunction restraining the respondents herein from interfering into our peaceful possession and enjoyment of petition schedule property i.e entire space in Fourth Floor (Eastern side block) of "HARI OM TOWERS' admeasuring 7215 Sft.Super Built Up Area (incl.30% common area) (45'6'X1 16'6") out of total land admeasuring 1326.42 Sq.yds., forming part and parcel of the premises bearing Municipal No.3-6-240 (eastern part) situated at Himayat Nagar, Hyderabad, Telangana State and bounded by North : Open to sky, South : Open to Sky, East : Open to Sky, West : 10 Feet Wide Common Corridor till disposalof suit. lA NO: 2 OF 2026 Petition under Section 151 CPC praying that in the circumstances stated in the affidavit filed in support of the petition, the High Court may be pleased to direct the XIV Additional Chief Judge, City Civil Courts at Hyderabad to dispose-of lA No.497 of 2025 in OS No.180 of 2020 (old OS No.157 of 2014), as expeditiously as possible in accordance with Law, within a reasonable time to be fixed by this Honble Court, pending disposal of CRP. Counsel for the Petitioners in all C.R.Ps : SRI.RAJEEV GURUNG COUNSEL REP.SRIJ. DAMODAR Counsel for the Respondents: --- The Court at the stage of admission made the following: ORDER

IN THE BTGH COURT FOR THE STATE OF TELANGANA ATHYDERABAI) THE HONOURABLE SRI JUSTICE P.SAM KOSHY CryIL ITEVISION PETITION Nos.419. 421 & 424 of2026 DATE:20.02.2026 Between : Smt. K.Malti Singh, and 2 others. . . . Petitioners AND Sant Sri Asaramji Ashram Trust Delhi and l0 others . . . Respondents COMMON ()RDER: Heard lvlr. Rajeev Gurung, learned counsel appearing on behalf of Mr. J.Damodar, learned counsel for the petitioner in all these cases.

2. Since r.he issue in the instant Civil Revision petitions and the parties thereto are same, they are heard together and are decided by this Common Orc,er.

3. Civil l(evision Petition No.424 of 2026 has been filed by the petitioner set:king for a limited relief of directing the XIV Additional Chief Judge, City Civil Court, Hyderabad, (for short .the Trial Court,) Ir I I I

seized of O.S.No.180 of 2020 to decide I.A.No.497 of 2025 at the earliest.

4. Learned counsel appearing for the petitioner submits that in the suit O.S.No.180 of 2020 which is f,rled for declaration, recovery of possession and perpetual injunction, the petitioner also filed I.A.No.497 of 2025 seeking for an interim protection so far as restraining the respondents from interfering with the peaceful possession of the petition schedule property by the petitioner. However, though the application was filed on 10.04.2025 and the respondents have entered appearance and filed their counter, the same has till date not been decided.

5. Learned counsel appearing for the petitioner also submits that the respondents and their henchmen in between are frequently visiting the premises and interfering with the peaceful possession. Further, their goons have also entered into the premises and damaged the CCTV cameras and other properties, which all the more warrants an early disposal of the said application and appropriate direction pending the suit.

Page.3 of 5

6. Con:;idering the total facts and circumstances of the case, particularl:/ taking into consideration the pendency of the I.A. itself since the year 2(,20, this Court is of the considered opinion that ends ofjustice would meet if I.A.No.497 of 2020 is taken up and decided at the earliest. Accordingty, the Trial Court is directed to take up and decide I.A.No.497 of 2025 on its own merits after hearing both the sides at the earliest, preferably within a period of 45 days from the next date of hearing. The Trial Court need not wait for other connected suits to ripen up so far as present I.A.No.497 of 2025 is concemed. Civil Revision petition No.424 of 2026 accordingly stands disposed of.

7. Civ:l Revision Petition No.419 of 2026 is also filed seeking for a limited relief of directing the Trial Court seized of O.S.No.l80 of 2020 to decide I.A.No.l82 of 2025 which is an application filed for amendment of the plaint at the earliest.

8. Learned counsel for the petitioner submits that in spite of the fact that the sz.id I.A. was filed in January 2025, and from the proceedings it reflects that the Trial Court has closed the arguments of the parties on the said I.A. as early as on 09.09.2025, but till date no orders as such have been passed.

9. Considering the facts and circumstances of the case, more particularly perusal of the proceedings and the docket orders, what is apparently reflected is that the Trial Court already heard the arguments on behalf of all the parties and posted for orders on L9.09.2025. Thereafter, till date orders have not been passed on the said t.A. [n view of the same, Civil Revision Petition No.4l9 of 2026 is disposed of directing the Trial Court to take up and decide I.A.No.182 of 2025 on its own merits after hearing both the sides at the earliest, preferably within a period of 45 days from the next date of hearing.

10. Civil Revision Petition No.42l of 2026 is also filed seeking for a limited relief of directing the Trial Court seized of O.S.No.l80 of 2020 to conclude the said suit at the earliest.

11. Upon perusal of the pleadings attached and also upon going through the contents, the Civil Revision Petitions which were filed by the same petitioner i.e. Civil Revision Petition Nos.4l9 & 424 of 2026

\ To and which have got disposed of, the facts reversed is that the suit was filed in the; year 2020, but till date the suit has not progressed except for filing of written statement by the respondents and since then it is getting protracted only on miscellaneous applications filed by either of the parties anc. in the process 6 years have passed. 12- Giv':n the seniority of the suit, this court does not intend to keep the Civil Revision Petition pending any further. This Civil Revision Petition ili also disposed of directing the Trial Court to ensure that considering the seniority of the suit, the same is taken up and decided on its own merits in accordance with law at the earliest, preferably within a period of I year from the next date of hearing.

13. [n t]re result, the three Civil Revision petitions are disposed of.

14. As a sequel, miscellaneous petitions pending if any, shall stand closed. However, there shall be no order as to costs. GOWRI SHANKAR ANT REGISTRAR //TRUE COPYII OFFICER

1. The XtV Additi( j, p#Bi'*lji'i3:,f#:t1 tffi;3i,,r ?JI,iJi- Ks/PSL -[ !V\, /"/ rabad

HIGH COURT DATED:2010212026

ORDER

CRP.N o.419, 421 and 424 of 2026 Disposing of the G.R. Without costs. .-ia' iiin ' .li.: o t_) fi I l, i,B 2ll1n * ab