Telangana High Court
CRP/511/2026 of Ms.Maheshwari Dubbaka Laxman Vs Perikala Praveen Kumar on 20 February 2026
THE HIGH COURT FOR THE STATE OF TELANGANA AT HYDERABAO FRIDAY, THE TWENTIETH DAY OF FEBRUARY TWO THOUSAND AND TWENTY SIX PRESENT THE HONOURABLE SRI JUSTICE K.LAKSHMAN CIVIL REVISION PETITION NO: 5110F 2026 Petition under Article 227 of lhe constitution of lndia aggrieved by the order dated
[ 31681
IN THE HIGH COURT FOR THE STATE OF TELANGANA
AT HYDERABAO
FRIDAY, THE TWENTIETH DAY OF FEBRUARY
TWO THOUSAND AND TWENTY SIX
PRESENT
THE HONOURABLE SRI JUSTICE K.LAKSHMAN
CIVIL REVISION PETITION NO: 5110F 2026
Petition under Article 227 of lhe constitution of lndia aggrieved by the order dated 22-09-2025 in l.A No 1932 of 2025, in O S No 709 of 2025 on the file of the court of the Principal senior civrl Judge, Medchal-Malkajgiri District at Kushaiguda.
Between:
Ms.lilaheshwari Dubbaka Laxman, D/o Dubbaka V Laxman -Ra^o, aged. about ,7 t;t;, Oaa. privite -emptovee, R/o H No B-1-256 86257'Shivaji Nasar'
Secunderabad-500003
...PETITIONER/DEFENDANT No' 2
AND
1. Perikala Praveen Kumar, S/o. P.Kotesara Rao, aged about 35 years' Occ'
orivate Emolov".,
-'Rl'o'
U -
t'to.S-t 1 1 15/ 506,F'iat No 201 ' Panchvathi'
h"tlaln.y, HT iioad, old Alwal Medchal-Malkagiri District
2. Ayyanna Konidala, S/o K.Rosaiah,. aged.about 58 years, Occ Business' R/o
- tl'.f'loi,.Z-l Zle, enattrala Cotony, Neir Nagole Rdad No 3, Uppal Mandal'
Hyderabad-500068
...RESPONDENTS/PLAINTIFF/ORIGINAL DEFENDANT
PetitionunderSectionl5lCPCprayingthatinthecircumstancesstated in the affidavit filed in support of the petition, the High Court may be pleased.to grrnt "try the ex-parte ad- interim injuncton order dated 22.09.2025 in l.A. No.
iStZ ot iOZS in O S ruo. 709 ot 2025 passed by the Principal Senior Civil Judge, at Malkai giri, District at Khushaiguda Counsel for the Petitioner: Sri Venkat Rao Patil IA NO: 2 OF 2026
Counsel for the ResPondents:
The Court made the following: ORDER
IN THE HI(;H COURT FORTHESTATE OF TELANGANA
AT HYDERABAD
THE IION'BLE SRI JUSTICE K. LAKSHMAN
CIVII, REVISION PETITION NO.51I OF 2026
DATE OF ORDER: 20.02.2026
Betwecn:
Maheshwari I)ubbaka Laxman.
Petitioner.
AND
Perikala Pravcen Kumar and another
Respondents.
Citations and Judicial Treatment
Cited by
0
Decisions in the index citing it
Cites
0
Decisions referred to
In this index
0
Of the decisions it cites
Overruled / Questioned
0
No negative treatment found
Loading the citing and cited decisions…
This judgment in the centre: on the left the decisions it cites, on the right the decisions citing it. Colour is the treatment; choose a decision to open it.
ORAL ORDER:
I-leard Mr.Venkat Rao Patil, learned counsel tbr the petrtroner Tl.re gricvance of the petitioner in the present revision is that leamed Principal Senior Civil Judge, Kushaiguda, Medchal Malkajgiri t)istrict, granted an ex parte interim irtiunction vde order dated 22..09.2025 in I.A.No.l932 ot 2025 in O.S.No.709 of 2025, and not disposing of the said l.A. within thirty (30) days in terms of Order XXXIX Rule 3-A of thc Code of Civil Procedure, ) 1908.
3. Respondent No. l/plaintiff filed the aforesaid suit against the petitioner/defendant No.2 and rcspondent No.2/defendant No.1 seeking specific perfbrmance of agreement of sale.
According to the leamed counsel for the petitioner, pleadings in I.A.No.1932 of 2025 are complete. It is posted to 02.03.2026.
5. In the light of the same, it is apt to note that as per Order XXXX Rule 3-A of C.P.C. r.l,here an injunction has been granted without giving notice to the opposite party, the learned trial Court shall make an endeavor to finally dispose of the application within thifty (30) days from the date on rvhich the injunction was granted and where it is unable so to do, it shall record its reasons for such inability.
6. As discussed supra, in the present case, leamed trial Court granted an injunction order ex parte in favour of the respondenVplaintiff on 22.09.2025. Therefore, leamed trial Court has to dispose of the said [.A. in terms of Order XXXIX, Rule 3-A of C.P.C. In the light of the same, notice to respondent Nos. I and 2
To, is waived of by invoking power of this Clourt under Article - 227 of the Constitution of India.
7. In the light of the afblesaid discussion, this Civil Revision Petition is disposcd of directing learned PrincipaI Senior Civil Judgc. Kushaiguda, Medchal - Malkajgiri District. to dispose of l.A.No.l932 of 2025 in O.S.No.709 of 2025, strictly in accordance rvith larv, as expeditiously as possible, preferably within a period of thift) (i0) da1's fronr the date of receipt of a cop)' of this order. Libenl is granted to the petitioner to file an application seeking advancernent of hearing of the said I.A. and it is fbr the leamed trial Court to consider the same. ,.\s a scquel thereto, miscellaneous petitions, if any. pending in thc Civil llevision Petition shall stand closed. 'I-here shall be no order as to costs. SD/- MOHD.ISMAIL DEPUTY REGISTRAR //TRUE COPY// S CTION OFFICER
1. The Principal Senior civil Judge, Medchal-Malkajgiri District at Kushaiguda
2. One CC to Srr Venkat Rao Patil, Advocate IOPUCI
3. Two CD Copies VI{/PSL @
i
HIGH COURT DATED: 2010212026
ORDER
CRP.No.S11 of 2026 DISPOSING OF CRP J-xs +f=f"e () - o
( s g THE 6 t{t ,t it )rpt t e9 rc