Telangana High Court
WP/46114/2016 of MR. GORLA MAHEEDHAR REDDY, USA AND 2 OTHERS Vs COMMISSIONER, MUNICIPAL ADMIN., HYD AND 3 OTHERS on 17 February 2026
THE HIGH COURT FOR THE STATE OF TELANGANA AT HYDERABAD (Special Original Jurisdiction) TUESDAY, THE SEVENTEENTH DAY OF FEBRUARY TWO THOUSAND AND TWENTY SIX PRESENT THE HONOURABLE SRI JUSTICE SUDDALA CHALAPATHI RAO WRIT PETITION NO: 46114 OF 2016 Between: 1. Mr. Gorla Maheedhar Reddy, S/o. G.
[ 34851
IN THE HIGH COURT FOR THE STATE OF TELANGANA
AT HYDERABAD
(Special Original Jurisdiction)
TUESDAY, THE SEVENTEENTH DAY OF FEBRUARY
TWO THOUSAND AND TWENTY SIX
PRESENT
THE HONOURABLE SRI JUSTICE SUDDALA CHALAPATHI RAO
WRIT PETITION NO: 46114 OF 2016
Between:
1. Mr. Gorla Maheedhar Reddy, S/o. G. Babu Reddy R/o Prajay Crest, S.P.
Road, Secunderabad, Temporarily Residing at 3621, Nahcliva Drive, Flower Mound, Texas T5022, U.S.A.
2. Mrs. Beeravolu Ramani Reddy, W/o. Gorla Maheedhar Reddy R/o Pralay Crest, S.P. Road, Secunderabad. Temporarily Residing al 3621, Nancliva Drive, Flower Mound, Texas T5022, U.S.A.
Petitioner 1 and 2 are represented by their SPA holder Mr. Beeravolu Surender Reddy anayed as P-3
3. Mr. Beeravolu Surender Reddy, S/o Late. B. Ramana Reddy Aged 70 years, Occ Retd. Govt. Employee, Rl/o Prajay Crest, S.P. Road, Secunderabad.
...PET!TIONERS
D
1. The Greater Hyderabad Municipal Corporation, Buddha Purnima Bhavan, Tank Bund Road, Hyderabad. Rep. by its Commissioner
2. Baby Gummakonda Sruthima Reddy, S/o. Gummakonda Yadava Reddy Aged about 16 years, Occ Student. Rl/o H.No. 3-1-3511, Hyderguda village, Rajendemagar, R.R. Dist., Hyderabad
3. BabyGummakonda Sinduja Reddy, D/o. Gummakonda Yadava ReddyAged about 13 years, Occ Student Fl/o H.No. 3-1-35/1 , Hyderguda village, Rajendemagar, R.R. Dist., Hyderabad The Respondent Nos. 2 & 3 are minors and are represented by their natural Guardian Smt. G.Soujanya Reddy, Wo. Sri. G. Yadava Reddy arrayed as R-4
4. G.Soujanya Reddy, Wo. Sri. G. Yadava Reddy Aged about 40 years, Ryo H.No. 3-1-35/1, Hyderguda village, Rajendemagar, R.R. Dist., Hyderabad )
...RESPONDENTS
Petition under Article 226 of the Constitution of lhdia praying that in the circumstances stated in the affidavit filed therewith, the High Cou( may be pleased to issue a Writ of Mandamus or any other Writ against the inaction of the authorities of Respondent No.1 in taking necessary action against the illegal construction made by Respondent No.2 and 3 in Plot No.49, Sy.366, in category HIG of Attapur Residential Complex at Attapur, Rajendra Nagar Mandal, Ranga Reddy District as arbitrary, illegal, biased and unconstitutional and also consequently direct the authorities of Respondent No.1 to demolish the illegal construction made by Respondent No. 2 to 4, in Plot No. 49, Sy. No. 366, in category HIG of Attapur Residential Complex at Attapur, Rajendra Nagar Mandal, Ranlya Reddy district.
l.A. NO:1
2016(WPMP. NO:56787 0F 2016)
Petition under Section 151 CPC praying that in the circumstances stated in the affidavit filed in support of the petition, the High Court may be pleased to direct the respondent to stop the construction on Plot No.49, Sy.366, in category HIG of Attapu,r Residential Complex at Attapur, Rajendra Nagar Mandal, pending the Writ Petition.
oF 2016
Gounsel for the Petitioner(s): SRI K. ASWATH JANARDHAN REp. FOR
SRI KOPAL SHARRAF
Counsel forthe Respondent No.1: SRI RAPARTHI VENKATESH
(sc FoR GHMC)
Counsel for the Respondent No.2 to 4: SRI SREENIVASA RAO VELIVELA
The Court made the following: ORDER
Petitiorr under Section 151 CPC praying that in the circurnstances stated in the affidavit filed in support of the petition, the High Court may be pleased to direct the offic:ials of Respondent No. 1 to inspect the site and to file the report of the constructi,rn before this Hon'ble court along with the building permission and other records if any, which are related to the said construction being made by Respondent f,los. 2 to 4 in Plot No.49, Sy. No. 366, in category HIG of Attapur Residential Complex at Attapur, Rajendra Nagar Mandal, Ranga Reddy, pending the above Writ Petition.
IN THt.] HIGH COURT FOR THE STATE OF TELANGANA AT
HYDERABAD
HON'BLE SRI IUSTICE SUDDATA CHALAPATHI RAO
WRIT PETITION NO.46114 0F 2016
DATE: 17.02.2026
Between:
Mr. Gorla Maheedhar Reddy s/o. G.Babu Reddy, r/o.Prajay Crest, SP Roacl, Secunderabad and two others.
Petitioners
and
The Greater Hyderabad Municipal Corporation, Rep.by its Commissioner, Tank Bund Road, Hyderabad, and three others.
Respondents
Citations and Judicial Treatment
Cited by
0
Decisions in the index citing it
Cites
0
Decisions referred to
In this index
0
Of the decisions it cites
Overruled / Questioned
0
No negative treatment found
Loading the citing and cited decisions…
This judgment in the centre: on the left the decisions it cites, on the right the decisions citing it. Colour is the treatment; choose a decision to open it.
ORDER:
Heard Mr. K.Aswath Janardhan learned counsel representing Mr. Kopal sharaff, learned counsel for petitioners and Mr. Balu Dudekula, learned counsel representing Mr. Raparthi Venkatestr, learned Standing Counsel for respondent No.l.
2. The instant writ petition has been filed declaring the inaction of the respondent No.1 in taking necessary action against the illegal construction made by the respondent Nos.2 to 4 in plot No.49, sy.No.366, in Cat.egory HIG of Attapur Residential Complex at Attapur, Rajendra Nagar Mandal, Ranga Reddy arbitrary, illegal, biased and unconstitutional and District, as consequently \\ \ \ -=--T \ \
direct the authorities of respondent No.1 to dernolish the illegal constrrrctions rnade by the respondent Nos.2 to 4 over the said plot
3. lVhen the matter is taken up for hearing, learned counsel for the petitioners asserts that there are deviaticlns in the constrttr:tion made [ry the unofficial respondent No.2 to 4 crver the subject plot and despite the petitioner filing a complaint, the respondent lrlo.1 is not conl:emplating any actiott.
4. lx:arned counsel representing learneC Standing Counsei for GHMC would contend that as per the counter-affidavit, the authorities of the respondent No.L have inspected the subject site and found certain deviations from the sanctioned plan in the construcl;ion-s carried out by the respon.d-ent Nos.2 to 4 and consequently, notices were issued to them. However, learned Standing Counsel has placed on record a building permit order dated "t(i.02.2023, showing that the approved plan permits construction of one stilt plus four uPPer floors
5. In that view of the matter, learned Standing Counsel would submit that, cause in the writ petition does not survive and the same is liable to be dismissed. However, learned counsel for petitioner ff -=-*7,i contends that though the building permission was granted to the unofficial respondents in the year 2023, still there are some deviations in the construction over the subject property.
6. [n that view of the matter, now the permission is accorded to the unofficial respondents, the earlier complaint is misconceived and the writ petitioner is at liberty to file a representation before the respondent No.L along with all relevant particulars showing how the sanctioned plan was deviated by the unofficial respondents. If any representation is made by the petitioners, the respondent No.1 is directed to inspect the site and conduct an enquiry by following due procedure of law as envisaged under the provisions of GHMC Act, 1995, by giving opportunity to both the parties and pass appropriate orders thereon and take action pursuant thereof.
7. With the above direction, the Writ Petition is disposed of. There shall be no order as to costs Pend miscellaneous applications i^f any shall stand closed SD/.C. DEEPIKA ASSISTANT REGISTRAR //TRUE COPYII
SECTION OFFICER To, 1' The commissioner, The Greater H.yderabad Municipal corporation, Buddha purnima BhII?f,, -rgnibunt Roaol H-fi;r"d;
2. one cc to sRt (opnL SH4BB4_.'AdioH6iopuct 3- one cc to _sgr sner^rvAs4Rdd_ttliGit_lqvo-cate [opuc] t 4. one cc tg._s.[r RApAnrAiviirrxrEE-nib-iron cHMc w u l;:tt"6sll*uel- .,, HIGH COURT DATED: 1710212026
ORDER
WP.No.46114 ot 2016 DISPOSING OF THE WRIT PETITION WITHOUT GOSTS
oo
_t I srA 1 7 r{AR 2026 { I * \7 1 *