Telangana High Court

CC/1853/2023 of Arrabachala Yadagiri Vs Mr. M.D. Vinay Kumar on 13 February 2026

Cites 0, Cited by 0

COURT FOR THE STATE OF TELANGANA AT HYDERABAD FRIDAY, THE THIRTEENTH DAY OF FEBRUARY TWO THOUSAND AND TWENTY SIX PRESENT THE HONOURABLE SRI JUSTICE K.LAKSHMAN CONTEMPT CASE NO: 1853 OF 2023 Contempt Case filed Under Sections 10 to 12 of Contempt of Courts Act, 1971 to punish the respondents

tN THE HIGH COURT FOR THE STATE OF TELANGANA

AT HYDERABAD

FRIDAY, THE THIRTEENTH DAY OF FEBRUARY

TWO THOUSAND AND TWENTY SIX

PRESENT

THE HONOURABLE SRI JUSTICE K.LAKSHMAN

CONTEMPT CASE NO: 1853 OF 2023

Contempt Case filed Under Sections 10 to 12 of Contempt of Courts Act, 1971 to punish the respondents herein violating and disobeying the directions of the High Court dated 30-11 -2022 passed in W P. No.43140 of 2022.

Between:

Arrabachala Yadagiri, S/o Pochaiah, Aged 65 Years, Occu: Agriculture, R/o Rebarthy Village, lVaddur Revenue [Vlandal, Siddipet District.

...Petitioner

AND

lMr. tVl.D. Vinay Kumar, Assistant Director, Survey & Land Records Siddipet, Siddipet District Respondent Counsel for the Petitioner: Sri. Ashok Reddy Kanathala Counsel for the Respondent: Sri. Tekuru Swetcha, Asst. Gp For Revenue The Court made the following: ORDER

i.

l

H]IGH COURT FOR THE STATE OF TELANGANA

AT HYDERABAD

HON'BLE SRI JUSTICE K. LAKSHMAN .

CONTEMPT C

No.1853 OF 2023

Ddte: 13"ol-.7_oLg

Between

Arrabachala Yadagiri

Mr. M.D.Vinay Kumar,

The Assittant Director,

Survey &. Land Records,

Siddipet District.

.... . .Petitioner

and

Respondent

This Court delivered the following:-

Citations and Judicial Treatment

No citing decisions in the index yet

Cited by

0

Decisions in the index citing it

Cites

0

Decisions referred to

In this index

0

Of the decisions it cites

Overruled / Questioned

0

No negative treatment found

Loading the citing and cited decisions…

ORDER

Heard Sri Ashok Reddy Kanathala, learned counsel for the petitionel and Ms. Tekuru Swetcha, learned Asst.Govt.pleader for Revenue appearing for respondent

2. This contempt case is filed alleging willful and deliberate disobedience of the order dated 30.11 .2022 passed by this Court in W.P. No. 43140 of 2022 by the respondent herein.

3. 'vide the aforesaid order, this court directed the respondent herein to dispose of F-line applicarion dated 19.06.2020 submitted by the petitioner, conduct survey, demarcate the aforesaid land and fix boundaries, strictly in accordance with law by putting the petitioner I I ' ,i r.i ,r;r{ t ., ! . rl1,; and all affected parties on notice and affording them an opportunity. If he is not inclined to accept the claim of the petitioner, he shall assign specific reasons, pass a reasoned order and shall communicate a copy of the said order to the petitioner. FIe shall cornplete the said exercise within 45 days from the date of receipt of a copy of the said order.

4. Perusal of the record would show that Tahsildar, Maddur Mandal, has issued Endorsement dated 13.04.2023 stating that the surveydr has submitted a report dated 13.04.2023 stating that due to non-availability of separate Mup and Field Measurement Book (Tippon) for the above said survey/Sub-Division Number, the demarcation, fixing of boundary and conduct of survey is not possible.

5. The petitioner submitted the aforesaid F-line application dated 19.06.2020 with a request to conduct survey, with the Tahsildar, Maddur Mandal, but not with the Assistant Director, Survey and Records, Siddipet.

6. The respondent has filed counter reiterating the aforesaid factual aspects. However, it is for the petitioner to challenge the said Endorsement, dated 13.04.2023 issued by the Tahsildar, Maddur Mandal.

7. rn the light of the same, this contempt is closed. However, liberty is granted to the petitioner to challenge the Endorsement dated )\I

1. \

J 13.04.2'.023 issued by the Tahsildar, Muddur Mandal, Siddipet Districr., and take all the pleas whictr he has raised in the aforesaid writ petition and also in this contempt. l\s a sequel, the rniscellaneous applications, if any, pending in the Conternpt Case shall stand closed. //TRUE COPY// SD/- L.LAKSHMI BABU DEPUTY REGISTRAR S N OFFICER To,

Two CC s to Gp For R Hyderabad [OUT] evenue, High Court for the State of Telangana, at \ ? 9r" gg to sri Ashok Reddy Kanathara, Standing counser [opuc] [

3. Two CD Copies GNK/PSL t., t)

HIGH COURT DATED: 1310212026

ORDER

CC.No.1iB53 of 2023 CLOSING THE CONTEMPT CASE b\b ;t :'lir I . ii!'. ' ; ,t,rhl1, i 1 6 l{AB 7.i17fr rHE S () * *

ah

You have used today's free searches. Sign in, for free, to keep searching without a limit.

Compass reads the judgments for you and finds the paragraphs for and against your question. Sign in to use it.

My Vault follows judgments for you and records every later decision that cites them. Sign in to keep one.

Sign in to download the court's PDF. The full text stays free to read here.

Sign in, for free, to download the court copy. Reading the full text here stays open to everyone.

Search and read Indian judgments without limits, save them to My Vault and find the relevant paragraphs with Compass.

Open the sign-in page instead