Telangana High Court
CRP/457/2026 of Sri.Raj Kumar Goud alias Raj Kumar Varaganti Vs Smt. B.Sowjanya on 13 February 2026
COURT FOR THE STATE OF TELANGANA AT HYDERABAD FRIDAY, THE THIRTEENTH DAY OF FEBRUARY TWO THOUSAND AND TWENTY SIX PRESENT THE HONOURABLE SRI JUSTICE NAMAVARAPU RAJESHWAR RAO CIVIL REVISION PETITION NO: 457 OF 2026 Petition under Article 227 of lhe Constitution of lndia, praying that in the .
IN THE HIGH COURT FOR THE STATE OF TELANGANA AT
HYDERABAD
FRIDAY,THE THIRTEENTH DAY OF FEBRUARY
TWO THOUSAND AND TWENTY SIX
PRESENT
THE HONOURABLE SRI JUSTICE NAMAVARAPU RAJESHWAR RAO
CIVIL REVISION PETITION NO: 457 OF 2026
Petition under Article 227 of lhe Constitution of lndia, praying that in the . circumstances stated in the grounds filed herein, the High Court may be pleased to allow the present Civil Revision Petition thereby directing the ll Additional Family Court-cum-XV Additional Metropolitan Sessions Judge at Kalpatharu, Purani Haveli, Hyderabad to adjudicate and drspose of the OP No.1537 of 2022.
As well as all lnterlocutory application exepeditiously.
Between:
Sri Raj Kumar Goud @ Raj Kumar Varaganti, Sio V,Jagadish, Aged 41 years, Occ. Pvt. Employee, R/o H.No.1-1-1011N'1713, TRC X Roads, Musheerabad, Hyderabad.
...Petitioner/ Petitioner
AND
Smt. B.Sowjanya, Wo Raj Kumar Goud @
Raj Kumar Varaganti, Aged 40 years, Occ: House-wife, R/o Flat No.201,2nd Floor, Sai Southern Apartments, Street No.7, New Bakaram, Gandhi Nagar, Hyderabad-500080.
...RespondenV Respondent
For the Petitioner : Sri C. Kumar, Advocate For the Respondent: None Appeared The Court made the following- ORDER
t,/
/
IN THE HIGH COURT FOR THE STATE OF TELANGANA
AT HYDERABAD
THE HON'BLE SRI JUSTICE NAMAVARAPU RAJESHWAR RAO
DATE: 13.O2.2O26
CIVIL REVISION PETITIO N No.457 OF 2.J26
Between:
Sri Ral Kumar (;oJd ({i) iid] Kumar Varaganti
... Petitioner/ Petitioner
AND
...Respondent/ Respondent
Citations and Judicial Treatment
Cited by
0
Decisions in the index citing it
Cites
0
Decisions referred to
In this index
0
Of the decisions it cites
Overruled / Questioned
0
No negative treatment found
Loading the citing and cited decisions…
This judgment in the centre: on the left the decisions it cites, on the right the decisions citing it. Colour is the treatment; choose a decision to open it.
ORDER
fhe p, es.erri iivil Revision Petition is filed aggrieved by the inaction on thr-i part of t-he leat'ned II Additional Fanrily Court-cum- XV Additional l4etrc'politan Sessions ludge at Kalpatharu, Purani Haveli, Hyderabad. l1 disposing of the suit in O.P.No.153l of 2022. Smt. B. So\,vl- rr\,,1
2. Hearcl i.'l'. C, Kumar, learned counsel for the petitioner Perused the materi:-tl ctt record
3. Learncd counsel fcr the petitioner submitted that the petitioner orrginalll' filed O.P.No'1537 of 2022 under Sections 13(1)(ia) and t3(1)(iii) of the l-lindu Marriage Act on the file of the Principal Farniiy (.c-rrrrt, Hyderabad, seeking dissolution of marriaqe dated 28.03.2019. The respondent filed her counter affidavit on \
2 21.04.2023 raising allegations, to which the petitioner filed a detailed reply denying the same, and on the basis of the pleadings, points were framed for consideration
4. Learned counsel for the petitioner further submitted that, at the request of the petitioner, the OP was transferred to the learned II Additional Family Court-cum-XV Additional Metropolitan Sessions Judge at Kalpatharu, Purani Haveli, Hyderabad, as the then Presiding Officer of the Principal Family Court was the sister of the petitioner's counsel. After transfer, the petitioner furnished the respondent's address and filed his chief affidavit as PW 1 on 24 .O7 .2024.
5. ,The Court sent the notice to the respondent. Though notice was served on her, she was called absent on 04.06.2025 The matter has been repeatedly adjourned without conclusion of trial.
6. Learned counsel for the petitioner also submitted that the interlocutory application filed under Order VI Rule 17 read with Section 151 CPC seeking correction of the petitioner's name in the cause title from "Sri Raj Kumar Goud" to "Raj Kumar Goud @ Raj Kumar Varaganti" and the same has been posted along with the main case on 19.01.2026.
7, Learned counsel for the petitioner further submits that the OP has been pending since 2022, and prayed to allow the CRP.
8. In view of the: above submissions made by the learned counsel lor the petitioner, the learned II Additional Family Court- cum-XV Additional lvletropolitan Sessions ludge at Kalpatharu, Purani Haveli, llyder.abad, is directed to expedite the trial and dispose of the O.P.No.1537 of 2022 as expeditiously as possible.
9. With the abo,re direction, this Civil Revision Petition is disposed of. There snall be no order as to costs. As a sequcl, rn scellaneous applications pending, if any, in this Civil Rcvrsiorl Pe titicr'r, shall stand closed. SD/- A.SREENIVASA REDDY ASSISTANT REGISTRAR Cg ,TRUE COPY// SECTION OFFICER .1 The ll Additional F;:mily Court-cum-XV Additional Metropolitan Sessions Judge at Kalpatharu, Purani Haveli, Hyderabad
2. One CC to Sri C. Kumar Advocate [OPUC]
3. Two CD Copies To, $, \
II HIGH COURT DATED.l 3t02t2026
ORDER
CRP No 457 ot 2026 ( R Til s 't-4 it .) -) \* :-4" ,t- 2 1 r{q 202 IP.il ,- r-f .:O rt+ .)*.\rot ..-\ CIVIL REVISION PETITION IS DISPOSED OF, NO COSTS tr 2[