Telangana High Court

CC/1528/2025 of Parigi Krishnaiah Vs Sri Prateek Jain, I.A.S., on 13 February 2026

Cites 0, Cited by 0

IN THE HIGH COURT FOR THE STATE OF TELANGANA AT HYDERABAD FRIDAY, THE THIRTEENTH DAY OF FEBRUARY TVVO THOUSAND AND TWENTY SIX PRESENT THE HONOURABLE SRI JUSTICE K.LAKSHMAN CONTEMPT CASE NO: 1528 OF 2025 Contempt Case under Sections 10 lo 12 of Contempt of Codrts Act 1971 to punish the respondent

f..

i

\

IN THE HIGH COURT FOR THE STATE OF TELANGANA

AT HYDERABAD

FRIDAY, THE THIRTEENTH DAY OF FEBRUARY

TVVO THOUSAND AND TWENTY SIX

PRESENT

THE HONOURABLE SRI JUSTICE K.LAKSHMAN

CONTEMPT CASE NO: 1528 OF 2025

Contempt Case under Sections 10 lo 12 of Contempt of Codrts Act 1971 to punish the respondent herein for the willful and deliberate disobedience of the order dated 02.04.2024 passed in W.P No.8392 of 2024.

Between:

Parigi Krishnaiah, S/o Parigi Ng1gagh, Age.d.- 19.ytt, O99-. A.gricultural labo-urer, R/o 3-19, Roopkhanpet, K.V. Rangareddy, Vikarabad District,

...PETITIONER

AND

1. Sri Prateek Jain, l.A.S., The District Collector, Vikarabad District.

Z. Sri M. Vasuchandra, The Revenue Divisional Officer, Vikarabad 'Division, Vikarabad District.

3. Sri Ananda Rao, The Tahsildar and Joint Sub-Registrar, Pargi JVlandal, Vikarabad District

..RESPONDENTS

Counsel for the Petitioner: Ms. Akthari

Gounsel for the Respondents:

The Court made the following: ORDER

IN THE TTIGH COURT FOR THE STATE OF TELANGANA

AT HYDERABAD

TTIE HON'BLE SRI JUSTICE K. LAKSHMAN

C.C. No.l528 of 2025

DATE OF ORDERI 13.02.2026

Between:

Parigi Krishnaiah

.Petitioner

AND

Sri Prateel.: Jain, I.A.S.,

The Distrir:t Collector,

Vikarabad District and2 others.

..Respondents

Citations and Judicial Treatment

No citing decisions in the index yet

Cited by

0

Decisions in the index citing it

Cites

0

Decisions referred to

In this index

0

Of the decisions it cites

Overruled / Questioned

0

No negative treatment found

Loading the citing and cited decisions…

ORDER:

Ms. Akthari, learned counsel for the petitioner, oD instructions, would submit that the respondents have already complied ''vith the order under contempt. In proof of the same, she has filed a copy of the Bhu Bharati status. The same is placed on record

2. In the light of the aforesaid submission, this Contempt Case is closed. Miscellaneous applications pending, if any, shall stand closed. //TRUE COPY// One CC to Ms. Akthari, Advocate IOPUC]

2. Two CD Cr>Pies dt-"*^,,.-r*&ffi;eti*{'."#_ DEPUTY R USHAMBA EGISTRAR SECTION OFFICER To,

\ctr

HIGH COURT DATED i 1310212026

ORDER

CC.No.152tl of 2025 CLOSING THE CC u.dA&*

You have used today's free searches. Sign in, for free, to keep searching without a limit.

Compass reads the judgments for you and finds the paragraphs for and against your question. Sign in to use it.

My Vault follows judgments for you and records every later decision that cites them. Sign in to keep one.

Sign in to download the court's PDF. The full text stays free to read here.

Sign in, for free, to download the court copy. Reading the full text here stays open to everyone.

Search and read Indian judgments without limits, save them to My Vault and find the relevant paragraphs with Compass.

Open the sign-in page instead