Telangana High Court
CRP/3968/2025 of Dastagir Mohammed Khan Vs Siraj Mohammed Khan on 12 February 2026
IN THE HIGH COURT FOR THE STATE OF TELANGANA AT HYDERABAD THURSDAY, THE TWELFTH DAY OF FEBRUARY TWO THOUSAND AND TWENTY SIX PRESENT THE HON'BLE SRI JUSTICE P. SAM KOSHY CIVIL REVISION PETITION NO: 3968 OF 2o25 Petition under ArTicle 227 of the Constitution of lndia aggrieved by the order dated
[ 3378 I
IN THE HIGH COURT FOR THE STATE OF TELANGANA
AT HYDERABAD
THURSDAY, THE TWELFTH DAY OF FEBRUARY
TWO THOUSAND AND TWENTY SIX
PRESENT
THE HON'BLE SRI JUSTICE P. SAM KOSHY
CIVIL REVISION PETITION NO: 3968 OF 2o25
Petition under ArTicle 227 of the Constitution of lndia aggrieved by the order dated 30-07-2025 passed in 1.A.No.263 of 2025 in O.S.No.412 of 202O on the hle of the Court of the lV Senior Civil Judge, City Civil Court, Hyderabad.
Between:
Dastagir Mohammed Khan, S/o.Late Sirtaj Mohammed Khan, Aged about 49
years, Occ: Service, R/o.H-No.9-2-446, Ground Floor, Fazila Niaz Gulshan, Pensionpura, Lunger House, Hyderabad.
...Revision Petitioner/Petitioner/Defendant
AND
Siraj Mohammed Khan, S/o-Late Sirtaj Mohammed Khan, Aged Major, Occ Business, R/o-H.No.9-2446, Ground Floor, Fazila Niaz Gulshan, Pensionpura, Lunger House, Hyderabad.
...RespondenURespondenUPlaintiff
IA NO: 1 OF 2025
Petition under Section '151 CPC praying that in the circumstances stated in the affidavit filed in support of the petition, the High Court may be pteased to stay of all further proceedings in O.S.No.412 of 2020 on the file of the Hon'ble lV
Senior Civil Judge, City Civil Court at Hyderabad, perrding disposal of the above present Civil Revision Petition.
Counsel for the Petitioner: Mr. K. Jamali Counsel for the Respondent: Mr. Ali Faraz Farooqui The Court made the following: ORDER
I
I
IN THE HIGT{ COURT FOR THE STATE OF TET/.NGANA
AT HYDERABAD
THE HONOIIRABLE SRI IUSTICE P.SAM KOSHY
CIVIL REVISION PETITTONNo.3968 of2025
DATE:12.02.2026
Ilctu ct tt :
qBDE-R:
I)astar.ir \lolr:rtr rrrrctl lihatt-
Pcunoncr
.\ND
Sirai \ [olrarrtrl ct l I'.hau
. .ltcspondcnt
\lr. \lt l lr,oc;. Icarrrctl counsel, apPearing on behalf o[ \[r' .\h lar-az [':rrr,r,t1rrt. lt:trttcrl cottttscl for the rcspondent submits that thc instarr r (.iYil l{r'r'isiorr l)ctition has become infructuous as thc s(lit bclirrC tlrc l riel (.otrrt stancls dccided against the pctiuoner hcrcin, *,lio lras Prc fi rrctl a littst ,\1-rpcal rvhich is at S.R. stagc aucl penclinq c(, \t(l( r'rli',rr.
2.
Irr r lt.rr , rI rlrc samc, the instant (]ivil Revision Pctition is clisposr:r1 oi lrs lr:rvrtr11 bccotne infructuous.
3.
,\s a scquel, misccllaneous pcririons pcnding i[ anl,, 5[12][ 56rr,1
closcd. I{orvever, therc shall be no order as to costs.
SD/. P.C.SULEKHA DEVI
ASSISTANT REGISTRAR
ECTION OFFICER
To,
//TRUE COPY//
The lV Senior Civil Judge, City Civil Court, Hydera One CC to Mr. K. Jamali, Advocate [OPUC]
One CC to Mr. Ali Faraz Farooqui, Advocate [OPUC]
Two CD Copies
SI-
4.
m/
a
K
d
W,
HIGH COURT
DATED:1210212026
Citations and Judicial Treatment
Cited by
0
Decisions in the index citing it
Cites
0
Decisions referred to
In this index
0
Of the decisions it cites
Overruled / Questioned
0
No negative treatment found
Loading the citing and cited decisions…
This judgment in the centre: on the left the decisions it cites, on the right the decisions citing it. Colour is the treatment; choose a decision to open it.
ORDER
CRP.No.3968 of 2025 \i\- THE CIVIL REVISION PETITION IS DISPOSED OF AS INFRUCTUOUS A r%\1 t h
I ilrR f'.) ,L+ nTHE S o Y * tr4TC 7L 2 lb s