Telangana High Court

WP/4706/2026 of MOHAMMED MUTEEF Vs Registrar (Recruitment) on 12 February 2026

Cites 0, Cited by 0

HIGH COURT FOR THE STATE OF TELANGANA AT HYDERABAD (Special Original Jurisdiction) THURSDAY, THE TWELFTH DAY OF FEBRUARY TWO THOUSAND AND TWENTY SIX PRESENT THE HONOURABLE SRI JUSTICE P.SAM KOSHY AND THE HONOURABLE SRI JUSTICE NARSING RAO NANDIKONDA WRIT PETITION NO: 4706 OF 2026 Between:

13447 |

IN THE HIGH COURT FOR THE STATE OF TELANGANA

AT HYDERABAD

(Special Original Jurisdiction)

THURSDAY, THE TWELFTH DAY OF FEBRUARY

TWO THOUSAND AND TWENTY SIX

PRESENT

THE HONOURABLE SRI JUSTICE P.SAM KOSHY

AND

THE HONOURABLE SRI JUSTICE NARSING RAO NANDIKONDA

WRIT PETITION NO: 4706 OF 2026

Between:

Mohammed Muteef, S/o. Mohammed Pashamrya, Aged- 24 years, Occ- Student. Rto. 124-104, Pragatr Nagar lt/loosapet Hyderabad - 500018.

.PETITIONER

AND

Regrstrar (Recruitment), Hrgh Court For the State of Telangana, Hyderabad - 500066

...RESPONDENT

Petition under Article 226 of the Constitution of lndia praying that in the circumstances stated in the affidavit filed therewith, the High Court may be pleased to issue a writ, order or orders or direction one in the nature of Mandamus declaring the inaction or omission of the Respondent for not making correction in the online Apphcation of the Petitioner by not considering the Representations of the Petitioner dated 27 JAN 2026 and 29 JAN 2026 as illegal, arbrtrary, capricious besides agarnst the spirit of the Article 14, l6 and 2'l of the constitution of lndia and consequently direct the Respondent to make Correction in the Online Application of the Petitioner in terms of the Representations of the Petitioner dated 27 JAN 2026 and 29 JAN 2026

Counsel for the Petitioner: SRI SYED AHMED

Counsel for the Respondent: ---

The Court made the following: ORDER

IN THE IIICH COURT FOR THE STATE OF I F]I,ANGANA

AT HYDERABAD

THE IIONOURABLE SRI JUSTICE P.SA\I KOSTIY

AND

TIIE IIONOURABI,E SRI JUS'I'ICE NAIISI IG I].AO

NANDIKONDA

W.P.No.4706 OF 2026

12.02.2026

Betrveen:

Mohammcd lvluteef, Sio. Mohammed Pashamiya.

..I)ctitioner

AND

Registrar (Rccruitrnent).

High Court fbr the State of Telangana,

Hyderabad.

. Rcspondent

ORDER, (pt,r !lon'ble Sri.Iustice P.Sam Koshy)

Heard Mr. Syed Ahmed, leamed counsel for th: petirioner and perused the rccord.

2.

The instant writ petition has been frled by the petitioner aggrieved by the inability tn uploading his rr rplication for participation in the recruitment process for the po:; of Examiner pursuant to the notification issued by the respondent- l tigh Court for the State of Telangana d,ated 19.01.2026.

3.

Leamed counsel for the petitioner submits that the writ petition has been flled in view of the urgency of the matter, as the last date for submission of the application being tomorrow i.e., 13,02.2016. He furthcr submits that an error occurred while entering the petitioner's name in the online application in as much as his actual naurc is "MOHAMMED MUTEEF". It rvas inadvertently got typed as "MOHAMME MUTEEF", with the letter "D" omitted. As there was no provision lbr editing the application once submitted, the said error could not be rectified by him. The petitioner has already subrnitted representations dated 27.01.2026 and 29.01.2026 to the respondent authorities seeking permission to edit his application or to submit a ficsh application

4.

Today, the matter was taken up on Lunch Motion in vie'uv of the urgency. We had called the Registrar (Recruitment) to seek instructions in this regard.

5.

The leamed Registrar (Recruitment) informs the Bench that the representations of the petitioner are under active consideration and the same shall be put forth before the Committee dealing with the recruitment process. It is further informed that permission would be \

granted to the petitioner insofar as correction of concerned.

6.

(iiven thc said submission by the iea.'

(Rccruitrncnt). u'e do not find anl'good reason to ct't writ petition. I-he pctitioner is dirccted to approach authoritics in this regard, rvho shall consider and 1i ordcrs on his lcprcsentations in accordance with larv, k the last date {irr submission of applications.

7.

Accordingly, thc Writ Petition stands disposec be no order as k) costs.

8.

Miscellaneous applications pending, if any, shaI

9.

The Olllce Objcction stands over-ruled. Let the restorecl by the ltegistrar. Meanrvhile, however, :

urgcncy of the rnatter, the matter u'as taken up on prior /A; //TRUE COPY//

his narne is

rcd I{cgistrar

tinue u'ith the

he lcspondent

ss appropriate

:eping in vierv

r[. There shall

stand closed.

vrit petition be

rnsidering thc

ty.

sD/-1. VTJAYA LAXMT "/

lISTANT REGISTRAR

\\._-

\ SECTION OFFICER

To,

TJ

f.-e-g1s-tqar (Recruitment), High Court For the State of T: angana, Hyderabad - 500066

2. One CC to Sri Syed Ahmed Advocate tOpUCl 3 Two CD Copies Pmq.

BS

I

I

HIGH COURT

DATED:1210212026

Citations and Judicial Treatment

No citing decisions in the index yet

Cited by

0

Decisions in the index citing it

Cites

0

Decisions referred to

In this index

0

Of the decisions it cites

Overruled / Questioned

0

No negative treatment found

Loading the citing and cited decisions…

ORDER

WP.No.4706 of 2026 DISPOSING OF THE WRIT PETITION WITHOUT COSTS il1 :: (: ;) ( 2 7 trB il[6 24\'\x"

You have used today's free searches. Sign in, for free, to keep searching without a limit.

Compass reads the judgments for you and finds the paragraphs for and against your question. Sign in to use it.

My Vault follows judgments for you and records every later decision that cites them. Sign in to keep one.

Sign in to download the court's PDF. The full text stays free to read here.

Sign in, for free, to download the court copy. Reading the full text here stays open to everyone.

Search and read Indian judgments without limits, save them to My Vault and find the relevant paragraphs with Compass.

Open the sign-in page instead