Telangana High Court
CRP/2009/2025 of Sri. M. Pushpal Reddy Vs M/s. Pushpanjali Engineering works on 12 February 2026
COURT FOR THE STATE OF TELANGANA // AT HYDERABAD THURSDAY, THE TWELFTH DAY OF FEBRUARY TWO THOUSAND AND TWENTY SIX PRESENT THE HONOURABLE SRI JUSTICE NAMAVARAPU RAJESHWAR RAO CIVIL REVISION PETITION NO: 2009 OF 2025 Petrtion under Article 227 of Ihe Constitutron of lndia, Aggrreved by lhe order
IN THE HIGH COURT FOR THE STATE OF TELANGANA // AT HYDERABAD
THURSDAY, THE TWELFTH DAY OF FEBRUARY
TWO THOUSAND AND TWENTY SIX
PRESENT
THE HONOURABLE SRI JUSTICE NAMAVARAPU RAJESHWAR RAO
CIVIL REVISION PETITION NO: 2009 OF 2025
Petrtion under Article 227 of Ihe Constitutron of lndia, Aggrreved by lhe order dated 08 05.2025 passed in LA. No. 3012024 in lA. No 14412023 in O S
No. 1885/2022 on the file of the lll Additional Junior Civil Judge-cum XIV
Additional Judicial I\/lagrstrate of First class, lVledchal It4alka;gtri Distrrct at Kukatpally Between:
Sri lt4. Pushpal
Business, R/o. H
Reddy, S/o. Late Sri Narayana Reddy. Aged 77 years, Occ No'175-8, Plassylain, Bowenpally. Secunderabad
...Petitioner/Plaintiff
AND
M/s. Pushpanjali Engineering works, Rep. by rts Proprietor Sri. V Purushotham Reddy S/o V lndia Redd"y Aged. 48 year-s, Occ Business. R/o Vrlla No 25, Luxura Green's Bowenpally, Secunderabad-'1 1
...RespondenUDefenda nt
lA NO: 1 OF 2025
Petition under Section 151 CPC praying that in the circumstances slated in the affidavit filed in support of the petition, the Hrgh Court may be pleased Direct respondent to pay rents for the interregnum period from January, 2020 Io July 2023 totally Rs. '1 1,61,000/-.
Counsel for the Petitioner: Mr. V S SUDHAKAR
Counsel for the Respondent: Mr GARLAPATI JITHENDER REDDY
The Court made the following: ORDER
i.:j*.::
IN THE HIGH COURT FOR THE STATE OF TT)] ,ANGANA
AT HYDERABAD
THE HON'BLE SRI JUSTICE NAMAVARAPU RA.I }SHWAR RAO
1 2th February, 2O26
CML REVISION PETITION No.2OO9 OF lO25
Between:
Sri M. Prrslr l:a I iiL'iici._r
...Petitioner
...Respondent
AI{D
N1 /s. IrL-rslrparrlrir it)l.rii,' . r'lr.ra. V'r,ti fi:i 2023 ,n O.S.\,, l,'i QED.EE
'lhis Civrl iir:r.,isri;rr I)r: i-itio r-r is 1-rlcd to set-rts L,lc the ordcrs dirted 08.O5..)i)25 il,s,-r'r1 in i.rrL.i'{o.30 of 202,1 ir I.A.No. 144 ol ,rl -,1(,r2,1 r;n the h1e oI t rc [e atnr:cl III
Acldition:r1 .J'.,rior (.lrvli .-;udgr.: cuin-XIV Adc[it onal Judicial N4agistr i.rte ol l"irst Ciirss. l,'l,rr:lctrirl llalkajgi i I)istrict at I(ul<at pall-v counsel for thc respondcnt
2.
Hr:r.rrcl Sri V . S.,sLldhali:rr. iearucd cou r r cl lbr the petitioncr untl Sri ():rriairati .Jithcrrcler Rr:i1r 1', learned r"
I
3.
Learned counsel for the pe titione r subniits that petitioncr has lrlccl O.S. No. 1885 ol 2022 l>efore thc trial court lrrr cviction of the rcspondent and 1br rreslte prolits. Later, thc ;retitiont:r hled l.A. No. 144 ol 2023 belbre Lhc trial coltrt for 114 of 2023 u,as allou,ecl.
4.
Lear-nr:d counscl hrr- thr: petitioner furtirer suirnrits that sincc the r-cspondcnl h:rs becn continu.ing in the suit schedulc propcrt\,, withor-rt payir-rg the rcnt at Rs.36,.100f - pt:r morrtir cleposit of adn.ritted rcnts by lhc rcsponder-rt. Tfre said I.A. No from December 2O2O to July 2023 as directed bl the trizrl Court. As such. the pctitionel iilcd I.A.No.3O ol 2024 to strike olf the rk:fencc of the respor-rder-r t/ defendant. But the trizil Court chsn'rissed the said pctition b1, obscn,ing that tl're issL-rt:
can bc lookcd into at the timc of lrial. Accordingly, prayed to allow the Civil Revision Petition.
5.
Per contra, learned counsel for the t'espondent submitted that there is no specific direction in the i.A. order to pay arrears and therelore there is rro need to pay the same J
A ircn-rsal o1-thc ot-cler irr I.t\.No' 144 of 2O2'" \ ttt l)ar:r'graph Nr,r.1 3 nIrl<es ir r:lcrri. tltat lhrc respondent is iable to pay arrcars of ret-rl trr thc 1;ctitiotrt:r' Ap:rrt from il t le triill Court al par:l No.14 'rlso t lcarly obscr\'('(l thil[
the
Responclc r-r t/ Dc li'r-rcl rrn t is clirt':cted to deposit r-tr clisputed rent amount of Rs..l.9(1..",O0/ ri'ithin 15 days atr I h-rrther the Rcspollrlt'nt/I)t,li,rrcllrlrt is cliI-t.cted to cleposit r-rlr l Rs.3tl'300/- per motlth br' 'r tlr ol t'r'cry nlonth zlncl in dcfauLt the defence of the Respondt llt,/ De li'rrilanr u ill bc struck ol-l ' \s strch' the respondcnt is clircctr-'d to pay the arrears of reut from Decemltcr202Oto.Jrrlv2023amountingtoll's11'61'600/- within :L periotl of thr-r'c (Ol3) nronths from the c I 1e of receipt of copy of this orclt'r.
T. Accorclingl.,', thc Civil Rcvision Petition r s allowed by setting aside thc ordcr datcrci OB.05'2025 in I ^ No'30 of 2024
in I.A No. 144 d'2023 it'L O.S No'1885 of 2022 : rL the file of the learnecl III Ad<litional .Jr.rnior civil Judge-cunr l{lV Additional Jud.icial Magistratr: ol First Class, Medchal-M: lkajgiri District at Kukatpallr. 'l'here shali bc t-ro order as to cos ts'
in this Petition. shall stzrr-rcl closeil As a sequel. miscellaneolls ztpplications pending. if an\l To, SD/- A.SREENIVASA REDDY
ASSISTANT REGISTRAR
//TRUE COPY//
ECTION OFFICER
1. The lll Additional Junior Civil Judge cum-XlV Additional Judicial I\Iagrstrate of First class, l\4edchal - l\,4alkajgiri District at Kukatpally
2. One CC to l\rlr. V S SUDHAKAR, Advocate IOPUC]
3 One CC to Mr. GARLAPATI JITHENDER REDDY, Advocate [OPUC]
4 Two CD Copies
RC/I'SL
tu
HIGH COURT
DATED: 1210212026
Citations and Judicial Treatment
Cited by
0
Decisions in the index citing it
Cites
0
Decisions referred to
In this index
0
Of the decisions it cites
Overruled / Questioned
0
No negative treatment found
Loading the citing and cited decisions…
This judgment in the centre: on the left the decisions it cites, on the right the decisions citing it. Colour is the treatment; choose a decision to open it.
ORDER
CRP.No.2009 of 2025 J'-*s alsltc \r " ( f :, l Allowing Civil Revision petition withouj costs. * e l,i Aq 2ll2[ z *