ITTA/181/2010 of SHRI K. SAMBA SIVA RAO ( HUF), HYD. Vs I.T.O., HYD. on 9 February 2026

1341.71

IN THE HIGH COURT FOR THE STATE OF TELANGANA

AT HYDERABAD

[/ONDAY, THE NINTH DAY OF FEBRUARY

TWO THOUSAND AND TWENTY SIX

PRESENT

THE HONOURABLE SRI JUSTICE P.SAM KOSHY

AND

THE HONOURABLE SRI JUSTICE NARSING RAO NANDIKONDA

INCOME TAX TRIBUNAL APPEAL NO: 181 OF 2010

Appeal Under Section 260-4 of the lncome Tax Act, 1961 aggrieved by the order dated 12.09.2008 passed in l.T.A No. 611l{ydl2003 for the Assessment Year 1 995 - 1 996 on the file of the lncome Tax Appellate Tribunal, Hyderabad - Bench-A, Hyderabad.

Between:

Shri K. Samba Siva Rao ( HUF), Hyderabad

...APPELLANT

AND

lncome Tax Officer, Ward - 6(4). Hyderabad

...RESPONDENT

Counsel for the Appellant: Sri. Maneesh Mahinvith representing M/s CKR Associates Counsel for the Respondent: Ms. B. Sapna Reddy (Senior SC lncome Tax)

The Court made the following: ORDER

IN THE HIGH COURT FOR THE STATE OF TELAN( , NA ,\T

HYDERABAD

THE IION0T]RAI}LE SRI JUSTICE P.SAM K(.: II}

ANI)

tHIi HONOTiRABLE SRI JUSTICE NARSING I{AO N r ,tDtKONt),\

ITTA No.181 of20l0

Date:09.02.2026

Bctween:

Mr.K.Samba Siva Rao (HUF),

Hydcrabad.

Appellant

And

Incorne 'fax O lficcr.

Ward-6(4). I Il derabad

. . Rcspondont

JUDGMENTi Q)er Hon'ble Sri Justice P.Satn Kosh.t)

Ms.B.Sapna Reddy. leamed Senior Sranding ( r unscl tirr rhc Incorne'fax Department, appears on behallofthe rcspon I rnt.

2.

Mr'.Maneesh Mahinvith, learned counsel reprcser.ine M/s.('KR

Associates. learncd counsel earlier rcprcsenting the pe i ioncr. suhrnits that inspite of his bcst cllbrts. therc arc no insrructions r(( iivcd liunr the appellant's sidc. l hc same statelncnt r.vas rnade on t c last dalc of hcaring alsr'r. lt rvas in that context, the matter r.vas dirci cd to be listcd today under thc caption'lor dismissal'. As there is no rt: .x.rnsc fiortr the appellant. this Bench is lefl with no othcr option bu to disrniss the appeal fbr want of prosecution, leaving the question ol la r filrmcd to bc considercd in an appropriate proceedings.

3.

Accordingly, the Appeal stands disrnisscd lor want of proscoution. Therc shall be no order as to costs Misccllaneous applications pending. if anr'. shall stand closcd SD/. P.CH.NAGABHUSHAMBA

ASSISTANT REGISTRAR

//TRUE COPY//

SECTION OFFICER

1. The lncome Tax Appellate Tribunal, Hyderabad _ Bench_A, Hyderabad.

2. One CC to M/s CKR Associates, Advocate IOPUCI

3. One CC to Ms. B. Sapna Reddy (Senior SC tncome Tax) Advocate [OPUC]

4. Two CD Copies

To

Pr/PSt.

HIGH COURT

DATED:0910212026