Telangana High Court
CC/4009/2025 of M.Ravi Prasad Vs Sri V.P. Gautam, I.A.S on 6 February 2026
IN THE HIGH COURT FOR THE STATE OF TELANGANA AT HYDERABAD FRIDAY, THE SIXTH DAY OF FEBRUARY TWO THOUSAND AND TWENTY SIX PRESENT THE HONOURABLE SRI JUSTTCE NAMAVARAPU RAJESHWAR RAO IN WRIT PETITION No.4475 OF 2025 Contempt Case filed Under Sections 10 to 12 of Contempt of Courts Act, 1971 to punish
IN THE HIGH COURT FOR THE STATE OF TELANGANA
AT HYDERABAD
FRIDAY, THE SIXTH DAY OF FEBRUARY
TWO THOUSAND AND TWENTY SIX
PRESENT
THE HONOURABLE SRI JUSTTCE NAMAVARAPU RAJESHWAR RAO
IN
WRIT PETITION No.4475 OF 2025
Contempt Case filed Under Sections 10 to 12 of Contempt of Courts Act, 1971 to punish the respondents herein violating and disobeying the directions of the High Court dated 17-2-2025 passed in W.p. No.4475 of 2025 - Between:
M.Ravi Prasad, Sio
Engineer, (Retired)
Hyderabad.
lVl.Subba Rao, Aged 61 years, Occ: Asst. Executive R/o. H.No. 6-3-609/178, Anand Nagar, Khairatabad,
...Petitioner
AND
1. Sri V.P. Gautam, l.A.S., Secretary, Transport, Roads & Building Department.
(Housing Deparlment), Telangana Secretariat, Hyderabad.
2. Sri V.P. Gautam, LA.S., Vice-Chairman & Housing Commissioner, Telangana Housing Board, Gruhakalpa, l\r.J. Road, Nampally, Hyderabad-sO0 001
...Respondents
Counsel for the Petitioner: Sri. Sai prasen Gundavaram Counsel for the Respondent No.1: Gp For Services I
Counsel for the Respondent No.2: Sri. A K Jayaprakash Rao The Court made the following: ORDER
IN THE HIGH COURT FOR THE STATE OF TELANGANA
AT HYDERABAD
THE IIOI{'BLE SRI JUSTICE NAMAVARAPU RAJESHWAR RAO
O6th Febru?rl, 2026
No.
IN
Between:
M. Ravi Prasad
. . . Petitioner
ANI)
Sri V.P. Gautam, I.A.S., Secretary,
Transport, Roads & Building Department,
(Housing Department) Telangana Secretariat, Hyderatrad and another
...Respondents
o
\
This contempt case is fited aleging vioration of the interim crrder passe,c by this court in I.A.No.1 of 2o2s in W.P.No.4 475 of 2025, dared LT.O2.2O2S.
2. whe:n the matter is taken up for hearing, rearned r standing counsel appearing for the respondents submits that the ,rder of this court has been comprie,c with and .
:
I
;
i
the case of the petitioner was rejected uide Letter No'
570 IHB I 2O2L-2, dated 20'0 l '2026 '
Learned counsel for the petitioner has not disputed the above said submission'
4.Sincetheorderpassed'bythisCourthasbeen compliedwith,thecontemptcaseisclosed'However'
liberty is given to the petitioner to challenge the rejection order, dated 20 -OL.2O26 in accordance with law'
Asaseqrrel,miscellaneousapplicationspending'if an], in this Contempt Case, shall stand closed'
SD/- MOHD. ISMAIL
DEPUTY REGISTRAR
//TRUE COPY//
S
ON OFFICER
of Telangana at
-a
i
I
J
'o'',. Two CCs to Gp For Services l' High Court for HYderabad [OUT]
2.OneCCtoSriSaiP,.a'unGundavaram'standingCounsel[OPUC]
3. One CC to SriO f
"V'Orakash
Rao' Advocate [OPUC]
4. Two CD CoPies
GNK/Sa
HIGH COURT
DATED: 06/0212026
Citations and Judicial Treatment
Cited by
0
Decisions in the index citing it
Cites
0
Decisions referred to
In this index
0
Of the decisions it cites
Overruled / Questioned
0
No negative treatment found
Loading the citing and cited decisions…
This judgment in the centre: on the left the decisions it cites, on the right the decisions citing it. Colour is the treatment; choose a decision to open it.
ORDER
CC.No.4009 of 2025 IN WRIT PE:TITION No.4475 of 2025 CLOSING THE CONTEMPT CASE ? lEtlAB ?o?E t z- * THE S u b b